this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
129 points (98.5% liked)

Android

32277 readers
292 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

Google says verification forces bad actors to use “real identity to distribute malware, making attacks significantly harder and more costly to scale.”

You are already doing that and somehow there is still malware in YOUR APP STORE

Kindly fuck right off a cliff into a mountain of cati Google

[–] grue@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago

The mere phasing of it as them "letting" users do it shows that they fundamentally Do Not Get It and are still failing to respect device owners' property rights.

[–] waddle_dee@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, work on a “dedicated account type for students and hobbyists” continues. This will allow for app distribution to a “limited number of devices without going through the full verification requirements.”

Well, that doesn't sound promising

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

It sounds like the Apple restriction. Apple lets you "side load" your own program without going through the Apple store but only for your own iphone.

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Dear GrapheneOS or Linux, please create a usable phone ASAP. They are all crazy. Sincerely.

[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also the Phone must be at or under 200$ no matter the build quality. I get it, linux users are likely to be cushy financially well off opsec nerds will pay out the wazoo for hardkill switches which I guess is your bread and butter whales to target in this market. Please release something economical for us plebs it can be like a walmart tracphone for all I care.

[–] Yaky@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

PinePhone is $200. But the manufacturer offloaded all development onto the community.

Librem actually pays some developers, but their phones are $700+. And you will find many complaints about refunds.

Cheap prices are possible by economies of scale by manufacturers, but same manufacturers guard their proprietary hardware.

Also, how "pleb" are we talking about? Many people DGAF and just want their calls/text/apps to work.

Pinephone and Librem 5 are fringe devices, some carriers don't even allow them.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

So they're backing out, but in a way that would still conveniently kill f-droid?

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Technically not. But only technically. The only reason to allow side loading at all is to allow "experienced users" to put unverified apps on their devices. Otherwise it doesn't make much sense to even make such a concession.

It looks like they're going to have two different solutions: one for power users and one for hobbyists and students.

My main problem with this is twofold. They explain exactly nothing about how they achieve "experienced user sideloading", they don't explain what an "experienced user" is, and they don't explain in any detail whether or not they're going to allow sideloaded apps to be unverified.

The other part of the problem is that I don't trust Google. There's way too many instances of them backing down publicly from a decision they made and then implementing it in a different way over time.

The truth is this announcement doesn't give us any details so all we can make are assumptions.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Their definition of experienced user is being able to follow an online guide to tap 5 times in a menu to enable developer mode. It is all a big joke.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

Fuck Google

[–] Osan@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I've already switched my pc to Linux. I'm willing to switch my phone to Linux too. My only problem with current alternatives is that none of them feel like a finished product Software-wise. And hardware-wise I have a galaxy ultra so the downgrade would be a lot especially in the performance and cameras.

We need a Linux based/Open-source alternative that could compete with the likes of Apple, Google, and Samsung. It's not impossible especially with current available technology, but I can see why the market incentives are very low.

I was hoping new laws could at least keep the status quo for a bit longer but it turns out as always relying on politicians is a bad idea.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 3 points 1 day ago

This is good. I have time to PLAN the de-googlification. Nice.

[–] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So are they requiring ADB installations or what?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We don't know exactly yet, but it sounds like they're transitioning away from that requirement.

It sounds like they're just going to put up more scary banners and/or hide the option in the developer menu.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago

"Are you sure? How sure? Just sure or sure-sure? How would you rate you sureness in a scale from 0 to 10?..."

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There's a thread about this on HN that I'm having trouble finding now, but I looked at it a couple days ago. It said you'll be able to install unverified programs, but other programs will be able to tell that you have done so. E.g. your banking app could consider your phone "contaminated" and refuse to run, if it knows you're running something unverified, that's presumptively intercepting your typing or whatever.

[–] PetteriPano@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

They already do this.

My banking app won't let me use it if I have bitwarden from f-droid active. Play store is fine.

[–] Kroko@feddit.online 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do Insular and silimiar apps block app from scanning?

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Idk what Insular is, but I don't think scanning is involved. Installing the unverified app sets a flag in the OS that other apps can read.

[–] Kroko@feddit.online 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Island, Insular, shelter all use Android for Work. There are other options like Private Space.
They give some isolation, but I don't know how much it helps.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wished Apple would do this.

They do. If you live in Europe.....

For the rest of us you can side load the app and have to renew it every 7 days. Sucks I know.