this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
598 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

76857 readers
2111 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Well, my kind of humor.

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Wasn't he all in on AI just a couple months ago? Praising how awesome vibe coding is? Fuck that guy. Just another billionaire peddling lies for profit. You'll just be creating content to train his AI.

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

As someone else said, don't be surprised if this is a ruse to hoover up training data that isn't AI generated. Guy is a tosser.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 136 points 3 days ago (13 children)

So what's the angle? The Internet is getting flooded by AI slop. AI needs fresh REAL content to train with. That's the angle. You are there to provide frsh amd original content to feed the AI.

Omfg this is so awful it's likely either accidental truth or a damn good prediction

Thats a very good point and probably exactly the idea. Dorsey has always just been an actor that says one thing and thinks another.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] henfredemars 254 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Enforcing that ban is going to be difficult.

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 159 points 3 days ago (5 children)

They’re gonna use AI to detect the use of AI.

[–] henfredemars 94 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Not if I use AI to hide my use of AI first!

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 38 points 3 days ago (4 children)

They are going to implement an AI detector detector detector.

[–] henfredemars 25 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It’s detectors all the way down.

But of course, as a tortoise, you would know that.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 12 points 3 days ago

Fun fact, this loop is kinda how one of the generative ML algorithms works. This algorithm is called Generative Adversarial Networks or GAN.

You have a so-called Generator neural network G that generates something (usually images) from random noise and a Discriminator neural network D that can take images (or whatever you're generating) as input and outputs whether this is real or fake (not actually in a binary way, but as a continuous value). D is trained on images from G, which should be classified as fake, and real images from a dataset that should be classified as real. G is trained to generate images from random noise vectors that fool D into thinking they're real. D is, like most neural networks, essentially just a mathematical function so you can just compute how to adjust the generated image to make it appear more real using derivatives.

In the perfect case these 2 networks battle until they reach peak performance. In practice you usually need to do some extra shit to prevent the whole situation from crashing and burning. What often happens, for instance, is that D becomes so good that it doesn't provide any useful feedback anymore. It sees the generated images as 100% fake, meaning there's no longer an obvious way to alter the generated image to make it seem more real.

Sorry for the infodump :3

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Just the threat of being able to summarily remove AI content and hand out account discipline will cut down drastically on AI and practically eliminate the really low effort 'slop', it's not perfect but it's damn useful.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)

Jack Dorsey once again singing "but baby I've changed!"

hard pass from me.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

Sure pal, sure. That's what all said, no AI, and look now.
Can't wait whe they will offer him 1bilion or scare him to death to put AI on it.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago

Why would anyone touch any garbage this guy produces?!

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 93 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It would be great if ALL social media platforms banned that garbage.

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 38 points 3 days ago (13 children)

Or just had a filter to hide it. I don't feel like banning something from everyone just because I personally don't like it.

load more comments (13 replies)

don't care dorsey is the problem

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To get the perfect selfie please pull your tongue back in your mouth. Good, now close you mouth. Perfect, now lower your phone thirty degree. Great, now lower it thirty degrees more. Almost there! Now lower thirty more degrees and put it the fuck away in your pocket.

Congratulations, you now have the perfect selfie.

[–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago
[–] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 81 points 3 days ago (13 children)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Lemmy hates everything and everyone it seems.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Jack Dorsey more than deserves the hate and I'm happy to discuss it with you.

[–] Dayroom7485@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

We like our negativity here - it’s still okay to disagree and be positive though!

That being said, Dorsey was fine selling his last media company to the highest-bidding fascist. Chances are he‘ll do it again.

Personally, I won’t use any social media that isn’t billionaire-proof.

Valid criticism isn't baseless hate. And, is better to be skeptical than blindly complacent.

[–] DarthAstrius@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

Rare Dorsey W

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 10 points 2 days ago

Honestly, I don't really trust any cryptobro, I see them on similar level as AI-bros

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Loops: "Am I a joke to you?"

Everyone else: "Who said that?"

[–] Concave1142@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ozoned@piefed.social 23 points 3 days ago (14 children)

Another walled garden that will fracture the system even more and give even more credit to the open social web.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›