A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
This is really on the line for world news.
American author, American artist, the only thing that barely qualifies it here is the Penguin half of Penguin/Random House is a UK Publisher and the conglomerate itself is owned out of Germany.
Allowing it for now, but it's right on the line.
Would you not consider an author who sold millions of books worldwide to be qualification enough for world news?
As a non American I wouldn’t mind articles about American authors in world news. It would have to be those with a high international profile though which gives the problem about where the line is.
I dunno, Lemmy wasn't around then, but let's take for example the time Stephen King got hit by a van and was damn near killed:
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2000/sep/24/stephenking.fiction
I'd say no, not World News. Definitely fit for News, Books, I dunno is there "Entertainment"?
But a car accident in Maine involving all Americans wouldn't be World News.
Agreed. It is highly reductive to refer to GRRM merely as “American author.” His works have been translated into over 45 languages, and he has won award in (at least) England, Ireland, France, Spain, Russia, Japan, and Finland, not to mention multiple wins from highly international completions like the Hugo and Nebula awards, the International Horror Guild, and Time Magazine’s list of the 100 most influential people in the world. He is one of the most popular authors of all time and if there is a line where someone crosses over into international relevance, we could debate where that line is, but there should be absolutely no doubt that he is far past it.
Tangentially:
George RR Martin says he is three quarters of the way through The Winds of Winter
George RR Martin is asymptotically approaching the completion of the next book in the series, while simultaneously aging in linear time, which presents fairly obvious problems.
He should finish up what he's already got by writing "Actually I just don't care anymore. The End" and leave the last quarter of the book blank pages. Probably better than anything else he's going to come up with at this point, and as a bonus it will fit perfectly with the ending of the show.
https://www.workableweb.com/_pages/tips_how_to_write_good.htm
All too often, the budding author finds that his tale has run its course and yet he sees no way to satisfactorily end it, or, in literary parlance, "wrap it up." Observe how easily I resolve this problem:
Suddenly, everyone was run over by a truck.
-the end-If the story happens to be set in England, use the same ending, slightly modified:
Suddenly, everyone was run over by a lorry.
-the end-If set in France:
Soudainement, tout le monde etait écrasé par un camion.
-finis-You'll be surprised at how many different settings and situations this ending applies to. For instance, if you were writing a story about ants, it would end "Suddenly, everyone was run over by a centipede." In fact, this is the only ending you ever need use.¹
¹ Warning - if you are writing a story about trucks, do not have the trucks run over by a truck. Have the trucks run over by a mammoth truck.
In Japan, being run over by a truck is merely the start of the story.
Is getting hit by a truck really the end? Or just the beginning?
Isekai genre: Allow me to introduce myself.
It would definitely subvert my expectations
If I remember correctly they were doing an illustrated version of the book each year and then the series got delayed because they fell out with the orginal illustrator.
So it would make sense that this one would be shit, because even if its not AI errors like this are basic shit to get right, because I believe the dispute was over money.
Cool and all, but no thanks.
Finish the goddamned series we've been waiting decades for.
Never gonna happen. S8 is the best we'll get 😢 😭 😢
I mean the series of books. That's all we want.
So did I. S8 is the only ending to the story of the books we'll ever get cos the final books are never going to be written
This timeline sucks... we really have to answer to people who suspect something may be AI now because it's too hard to tell sometimes? I kind of wish I was an artist, I would be adding extra fingers to everything just to get a reaction.
So in your opinion the problem is people worrying about something being AI generated and not the continued use and force feeding of AI into every aspect of life by corps feeding one another into an economic and ecological disaster? Hmm?
No, my problem is that we are at the point where we probably need to put labels on everything to officially certify it's not AI. Otherwise, everyone will just claim its AI.
Obviously, if the choice was no AI at all, then, of course, that should be the standard, but that's never going to happen ever again.
Why is that a problem? AI having to come with labels sounds great. It's both an obvious good and an obviously correct step to take. In a world with leaders who we're worth anything it would have happened immediately. The second deep fakes became possible an intelligent society would have immediately said all AI production has to be labeled.
So do only AI pics come with watermarks or do all things now need to come with a real and not real label. You pick up a book, and it has a label across the cover saying not generated by AI. Will there be a board created for people to certify its authenticity? Will that now cost people extra to have this verified? Yeah, that sounds great. Instead of simplifying things, it sounds like it just gets harder and harder like usual.
Why would you need a "not AI" label? Your argument is approaching absurdity. If something is produced by AI it should come labeled. 100% no exceptions. It's not difficult.
This article is about people not believing the cover is real. You think as soon as you start labeling just AI pics people won't just assume the ones that aren't weren't lying without being verified? And yeah, it is absurd, but if you really believe people won't think that way, then I guess you have more faith in them than I do.
Oh I have one. Since stupid people exist why have laws at all. Why not allow people to marry dogs. Am I playing the game right?