this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
58 points (93.9% liked)

World News

50764 readers
3046 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fans suspect cover elements of new illustrated edition of ‘A Feast for Crows’ generated with AI

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No, my problem is that we are at the point where we probably need to put labels on everything to officially certify it's not AI. Otherwise, everyone will just claim its AI.

Obviously, if the choice was no AI at all, then, of course, that should be the standard, but that's never going to happen ever again.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Why is that a problem? AI having to come with labels sounds great. It's both an obvious good and an obviously correct step to take. In a world with leaders who we're worth anything it would have happened immediately. The second deep fakes became possible an intelligent society would have immediately said all AI production has to be labeled.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

So do only AI pics come with watermarks or do all things now need to come with a real and not real label. You pick up a book, and it has a label across the cover saying not generated by AI. Will there be a board created for people to certify its authenticity? Will that now cost people extra to have this verified? Yeah, that sounds great. Instead of simplifying things, it sounds like it just gets harder and harder like usual.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Why would you need a "not AI" label? Your argument is approaching absurdity. If something is produced by AI it should come labeled. 100% no exceptions. It's not difficult.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This article is about people not believing the cover is real. You think as soon as you start labeling just AI pics people won't just assume the ones that aren't weren't lying without being verified? And yeah, it is absurd, but if you really believe people won't think that way, then I guess you have more faith in them than I do.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Oh I have one. Since stupid people exist why have laws at all. Why not allow people to marry dogs. Am I playing the game right?