this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
314 points (96.7% liked)

politics

26336 readers
3421 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Dementia is really taking hold on poor old pervert.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

I just wish he was gone. Fucking shitstain.

[–] blahblahblah@lemmy.zip 100 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“Old felon says nonsense things.”

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Why can’t the McDonald’s take him yet????

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Suffering from lifelong signs of chronic syphilis

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

It's just regular old dementia.

At this point it isn't even just Trump. Feels like half of Congress is geriatrics who don't know where they are being weekend at Bernie's-ed by a staff to vote on things they didn't read and don't understand.

[–] fittedsyllabi@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

Release the Epstein files!

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Lousy reporting. Don't refute or even explain the real reason for the vacancies, just a casual mention that they are their own worst enemies. What IS the murder rate there? How much crime is actually there,? What policies caused this? Without more details all the report is doing is pointing out that Trump said Miracle instead of Magnificent, which really isn't that big of a deal.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago

Oh yea, armed military police really make me wanna shop till I drop. How fun!

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

President Donald Trump posted to his Truth Social on Tuesday, saying to “CALL IN THE TROOPS” to save “The Miracle Mile Shopping Center in Chicago” – which doesn’t exist.

“The Miracle Mile Shopping Center in Chicago, once considered our Nation’s BEST, now has a more than 28% vacancy factor, and is ready to call it quits unless something is done about the murder and crime, which is prevalent throughout the City,” Trump wrote, adding:

CALL IN THE TROOPS, FAST, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE! “Just the News”

Media outlets were quick to report that no such shopping center exists, however. “Las Vegas, Los Angeles, and Monroeville, Pennsylvania, all have shopping malls or centers by that name, but none exist in Chicago or even in Illinois. There is, however, a Magnificent Mile shopping district in Chicago, which the president likely was referring to. The Magnificent Mile spans 13 blocks in downtown Chicago and offers high-end shopping and fine dining,” wrote Kelly Corbett for Syracuse.com.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Don’t forget the office vacancy rate in downtown Chicago matches his number. So someone told him there was 28% office vacancy, and someone told him there was a “Magnificent Mile” shopping district, and he conflated it to miracle mile shopping center 28% vacant because crime

[–] theolodis@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

which the president likely was referring to

I doubt it

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 5 points 19 hours ago

Leave it to the US media to sanewash Trump and his nonsense.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

He's calling for them to protect a real mall, he got the name of the mall wrong (and not even that egregiously). There's plenty of legitimately horrifying acts to criticize this fucker for, why are we resorting to the same kind of disingenuous truth-stretching rhetoric conservatives rely on to rile their degenerate base?

[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Protect it from what, vacancy? Like, sure he got the name a little wrong. But call in the troops to... Uh... Open up stores in the district? I think that's the crazy part. The headline should be more like "Trump orders a call to arms in a business district because stores are empty because the economy is in shambles and other reasons too" or something like that. I dunno, I'm not a headline writer.

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 1 points 22 hours ago

I think it's about "crime"... in his mind.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn't even call it a mall. It's a shopping district.

It’s pretty much a street with a bunch of expensive trendy outlet shops on it. Like UniQlo, Gucci, Breitling, or whatever. Same trendy shit that’s always grouped together.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (4 children)

he literally can’t remember the name of a mall. why are you defending that?

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even the sharpest humans forget things. This is a non-article, and it distracts from the active slide into fascism.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Do you think that this is the sole issue anyone is focusing on?

Or maybe, its being reported as evidence for yet another reason trump shouldnt be in office?

you are aware people can focus on and discuss more than a singular issue at a time?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

But people do have a limit to the number of things they can focus on at a time. Made up non-issue bullshit like this just gives the conservatives something to point to to justify their dismissal when legitimate news percolates through the bullshit to reach them, and takes attention that could be better spent on real news elsewhere.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Nuh-uh!

...

What were we talking about again?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've been there and if you had asked me yesterday what it was called there's a better than even chance I'd have called it Miracle Mile as well.

Magnificent Mile just sounds... well... it sounds like something Trump made up TBH. 😉

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (14 children)

I'm not, I'm criticizing this article taking up just that little bit more of the public's bandwidth with stupid rhetoric. There's more than enough that we should be worrying about and ample crimes he's guilty of, why do we need to bother manufacturing evidence when there's already overwhelming mountains of evidence just laying around? All this does is discredit our legitimate criticism by association and take up visual space that could be filled with real news.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago

You'd be shocked at what they're defending these days.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If he's going to use it as an impetus for deploying troops domestically then he should at least be able to name it correctly. If he can't even do that then it's pretty easy to argue his cognitive decline is progressing.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's not really the point. Sure you could argue this, but why the hell are we wasting our time arguing about if the stupid detail of him mixing up a word is actually relevant, instead of talking about the "he's trying to send troops to defend a street" thing? That is my point. I don't care if people think it's a sign of cognitive decline, I care that you're choosing to spend your time talking about that instead of the thing that really pressingly matters.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The point is that you think it's okay that a fascist demogogue trying to occupy his own country is too stupid to get a simple name right and is entirely delusional from top to bottom

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago

Oh hey, it's you again! How've you been? Still doing the "aggressively present some truly spectacular misinterpretation of what I've written" thing? Glad that's working out for you.

Aaaaanyways, I've never said or even tacitly implied that it's okay that trump is stupid, nor have I ever made anything like a hinting gesture that he isn't stupid, nor have I said that this isn't evidence of his mental decline, nor have I said that his overall mental decline isn't relevant.

As is becoming tradition, I invite you to give it another go.

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What mall is he trying to talk about?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

According to the article, he's talking about Magnificent Mile (which is apparently more of a street with stores on it than a classic shopping mall, just to add to the weirdness of him offering to deploy the military to defend it)

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So not a real mall. Got it

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It is a mall, being a broad street lined with shops and a promenade (though not wholly closed to traffic), but it's not a classic "shopping mall" as the term is most commonly used in the US (that being a massive temple complex built to honor consumerism and featuring some very bad food). Which makes it even more patently absurd for trump to want to send troops to defend what is essentially just... a street.

(note that trump never actually calls it a mall, he describes it as a "Shopping Center", adding to my annoyance over this headline...)

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Miracle Mile / Magnificent Mile... I'll give him a pass on that one.

I've actually BEEN there and couldn't remember the name either. Of course it was 30 years ago.

[–] Bonus@fedia.io 12 points 1 day ago

Miracle Mile is a real thing that exists. In Los Angeles. Even when I'm there, it's forgettable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_Mile,_Los_Angeles

Who uses the full name? We just say "mag mile."

[–] Harkronis@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 1 day ago

The troops and army are going to be so tired from how many finger points this king pedo of pedos has done, they're gonna be wishing they were fighting the War on Terror again because it was kindof something as opposed to nothing like this all is.

load more comments
view more: next ›