this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
22 points (92.3% liked)

transgender

2431 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to lemmy.ml/c/transgender! This is a community for sharing transgender or gender diverse related news articles, posts, and support for the community.

Rules:

  1. Bigotry, transphobia, racism, nationalism, and chauvinism are not allowed.

  2. Selfies are not permitted for the safety of users.

  3. No surveys or studies.

  4. Debating transgender rights is not allowed. Transgender rights are human rights. Debating transgender healthcare is not allowed. Transgender healthcare is a necessity.

  5. No civility policing transgender people. Transgender people have a right to be angry about transphobia and be rude to transphobes.

  6. If you are cis, do not downvote posts. We don't like you manipulating our community.

  7. Posts about dysphoria/trauma/transphobia should be NSFW tagged for community health purposes.

  8. For both cis and trans people: Please alter your username (if possible) to include pronouns (or lack thereof, or questioning) so no one misgenders anyone. details. This rule is important for maintaining a safe place. If you can't change your ID, please let a mod know and include it in your bio.

  9. Leftist infighting is not allowed.

Please remember to report posts that break any of these rules, it makes our job easier!


If you are looking for a more secure and safe trans space, we suggest you visit https://hexbear.net/c/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns. While we will try our best, lemmy.ml/c/transgender is far more open to the fediverse, and also to trolls. One of the site admins of lemmy.ml, nutomic, is also a transphobe, while hexbear is ran mostly by trans people and has a very active trans community.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With the recent decisions made by the supreme court, is the United states unsafe enough to trans people for us seek asylum elsewhere? I think these decisions are the government officially saying they do not acknowledge us for who we are. Is it time to start looking to seek asylum?

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

as far as I know, no country is granting asylum to trans people fleeing America; and no, the recent Supreme Court decision to allow Trump to enforce his policy while the court case is pending does not change that

whether other countries grant asylum is not necessarily the same as whether the US is actually unsafe enough for trans people to need to flee, though

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As an outsider looking in, possibly yes.

Just don't come to the UK right now, it's getting worse and worse at the moment for trans people.

The rest of western Europe is better for this, with many having self-id laws (I think you can change your gender legally without any procedure or having to wait for a doctor to approve you).

Whether you'll get a visa is another question, but a good start is going to study for a degree to get your foot in the door.

Alternatively, for Americans I hear Canada is a good choice, at one point they accepted LGBTQ people on refugee status from America (what a time we live in). Not sure how easy / hard that is to get.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago

Canada is not accepting American LGBT+ folks' asylum claims, there was a single case of a non-binary person who was not deported because they were a caretaker and because the US could be unsafe, and there is an American trans woman's asylum claim that will be heard, but neither case establishes that American asylum claims will be accepted

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the question is one that every minority should consider. I can’t say for sure that for everyone, yes it’s time to leave or anything. However, I do think it’s worth considering. There’s no shame in wanting to get out, this country is definitely hostile to lgbt people, and it’s going to get worse.

Personally, I’m not quite ready to flee yet, but it is in the back of my mind always.

Even if you decide to stay for now, I would say it would be prudent to at least have some ideas of where and how you might go about it.

[–] Ashenlux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's a tough decision. I just don't want to be too late.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago

If you don't have citizenship somewhere, you're going to need a lot of money or lead time. Start looking.

[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

I am not familiar enough with international law to evaluate that but...

The US passport and citizenship still counts for something. You don't need to go through the asylum process to live in most EU countries.

In my country (Finland) you need a job, study or research position (assuming you don't have an ETA citizenship or familial link).

A citizenship here will take minimum 8 years to get regardless of how you arrive. A permanent residence permit takes 4. The only benefit of asylum status for those is that the clock starts when you arrive vs when you get your first residence permit, but you can apply for a residence also from abroad.

Stay safe.

Ps. Don't trust me, I know nothing.

Do you have ancestry which can be traced to another country? Look up whether or not those countries have a law which confers citizenship to dependents of émigrés from that country. It still won't be a quick process, so the time to start is now.

For context, my husband and I are following up one such road to foreign citizenship. It's finally time to submit paperwork, and there is a 13 month waitlist just to hand in the documents. Then an estimated 18 months to receive citizenship. This is assuming that the large influx of applicants doesn't balloon the paperwork processing time even longer. According to one employee at the consulate I spoke to, they are dealing with a 300% increase in applications this year.

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You're an american your ~~visa~~ *passport works everywhere already, what do you mean by asylum, them providing you room and board?

[–] stray@pawb.social 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can't just move to any country you want just by having a visa. There are laws regarding duration of stay, employment, etc.

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And it is easier for Americans than anyone else in the world. If you weren't all obsessed with moving to Europe you'd get it. I mean, China only looks at conviction data, Europe bars you for getting arrested like once lmao

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

this isn't true, being American does not grant you indefinite legal right to live in other countries - you have to find some way to be sponsored and have a visa that gives you a legal basis

being able to visit a country for a short period of time as a tourist is not the same as being able to legally stay longer, get a job, secure housing, etc.

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think you guys may not understand how powerful the U.S. passport is relative to other countries. In my initial comment, I did say visa instead of passport, but that was just a slip of a tongue on dictation. There's no reason to try for asylum in those cases. You will not have a very hard time finding a visa in another country. Assuming we're not trying to get into Turkmenistan, which I don't think you are. I think you're just projecting a immigration situation you're used to elsewhere

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

the American passport allows for easy initial entry, but doesn't guarantee permanent residence, asylum cases are to permit people to stay legally in the country longer than the (short) initial period allowed for tourism ...

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Most important leverage is in the form of the skills and $$$ you have, yes, the difference is you're not trying to be retiree expats or anything gross like that, so you need a country that has strong labor protections bc you don't want any kids you have to suffer, which doesn't necessarily imply full Estonian "fork over cash for instant citizenship w our irrelevant geopolitical pawn country" treatment lol. Americans have an easier time than anyone else with this, don't wait for asylum. Shit, a lot of the nerds on here could probably land a Russian gold visa in a snap lol. Though for obvious "family values" reasons it's outside the scope of this community discussion! I mean the best option is like right there im just gatekeeping it want to see who recommends it of their own volition.

I mean can we establish, from the basics we agree on here, that easy access to a country & diplomatic relations makes it easier to do student programs or look for work in order to seek long term solutions, so what is the quibble anyways

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

> making false claims that Americans can go anywhere and stay

> thinking trans people would be seeking asylum in Russia

> account is new

you sure you're not some kind of bot?

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

reading is not your strong suit, I see. you ignored my clarification, and "family values" overtly refers to the bigoted laws. missing that kind of basic meaning in my words is what a bot would actually do, not make (apparently unwarranted) assumptions about the ability of the reader to understand it. Russia was pointed out because you can literally just throw money at them, and it's something affluent nerds would never do because of their nationalism. if you're going to be so rude I'm going to block you

something tells me, having already done it, I am more serious about getting out of the USA than you, someone who is moaning abt needing "asylum" to do it. hurry up, the financial system is rigged to collapse within years. Im too tired to explain the rest but i tried to politely explain you're shooting yourself in the foot by not already leaving, and nobody is giving stupid americans asylum because they elected someone like Bush again

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm sorry, I meant my comment mostly in jest (and somewhat bewilderment), I didn't mean to come across as rude 🤐

If your point is that Americans are in a stronger position to enter a foreign country and stay there by various means like getting sponsored by an employer or on a student visa, that seems clear enough - that's true even if just on the basis that Americans tend to have more money, assets in US dollars, and potentially better opportunities to get sought-after education in the U.S. that would make them skilled laborers in other parts of the world.

My point was just to clarify that getting that legal basis of staying in the foreign country (which is the point of the asylum claim) is not trivial even if it is easier for Americans relative to other nationalities. There are trans people in detention camps in Europe because they declared asylum and are being prepared for deportation back to the U.S. - not everyone is a skilled laborer or eligible to be a student (let alone successful in pursuing those opportunities).

And most of the trans population does not have passports, let alone the financial means to leave the country. Fleeing the country is a solution for a privileged minority. Most of us can't even leave the oppressive states we live in and move to more progressive states with laws that protect trans folks.

Also, the U.S. is still one of the best places in the world to be trans - we have better access to trans healthcare and rights than most of the rest of the world, and even the rest of the West. The situation is deteriorating (as it is in most of the rest of the world), but they did not even succeed in passing a trans athlete ban through Congress, let alone criminalization of being trans or revocation of care. Nothing like the laws that were on the books in the 1970s that outright banned "cross-dressing" have been passed or enforced.

[–] Kayday@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

China would be an attractive choice if it wasn't for their disappointing policies regarding trans people

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Somehow you made up a Chinese social issue even faker than the Uyghur genocide. I am impressed. You should research violence against minorities in China. Your own country is more dangerous. The preoccupation that marginalized groups in the west have with promoting the politics of their oppressors is deeply embarrassing. Every trans person online is basically an Uncle Tom for a democratic party that hates them

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

China does not allow or recognize same-sex marriages, are jailing gay women for writing erotica online, trans people have to have bottom surgery before they are permitted to update official documents, trans women are forced to notify their family and prove they have no criminal record before being allowed access to HRT, and in 2022 China passed a law preventing buying estrogen or anti-androgens online even with a prescription.

This is all much worse than in the US where most states allow you to update your gender marker on official documents without surgery, HRT can be obtained on the basis of informed consent (and without requirements of disclosing to family or having no criminal record), and LGBT+ people are not being jailed for writing erotica ...

The U.S. is indeed dangerous, and you are probably in greater danger of being a victim of stochastic violence in the U.S. than in China, but that is not the only thing that people look at when deciding if a country has better or worse laws, rights, or conditions for LGBT+ people.

edit: btw this isn't a theoretical problem for me, if China recognized same-sex marriage and had sufficient trans healthcare, I would probably be in China right now - I can't take refuge there because their laws are anti-LGBT+ and would not permit me a spousal visa to stay in the country because I'm a woman married to a woman.