Next they'll say the imprisoned population is freer because they're incarcerated in America
Main, home of the dope ass bear.
THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN "MAIN" OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)
(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)
A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!
Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!
State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership
Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources
Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)
Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with
Main Source for Feminism for Babies
Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide
Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow
In America the poor can choose between 1000 brands of bullshit they cant afford and thats where the real wealth is

So, the correct answer is that there’s simply no poor people in America or Europe, even though the way we measure wealth means that it appears that there’re more poor people in those two places than there are in China.
Bro is trippin balls 
And you, too can be rich with this one simple trick! :spongebob-imagination:
Every single sentence of this article is gobsmacking.
I think my favorite part is:
For example, that newly minted Harvard graduate, carrying perhaps $150k of debt and now coining it on Wall Street as a junior analyst would be counted, in this wealth measurement, as being in those poorest 10% of the world.
The idea of being one hundred and fifty thousand dollars in debt gives me heart palpations. Is this seriously the best defense that the author can offer, the example of going into debt to get the education and accreditation needed to then compete for jobs that may or may not be available? Actually, I'm sure it will be completely fine, because of the implicit family wealth and ivy league networking... things that every American definitely has access to!
No harvard graduate with connections to wall street is paying for their own schooling. Their parents almost definitely would have been footing the bill. Extremely rare in this era to be able to get your foot into the door of one of these companies unless you have nepotism or got lucky because your freshman year roommate's dad worked at Goldman.
Also, even a degree from Harvard doesn't guarantee you'll ever get out from under that debt in this economy. Not to put too much sympathy towards Harvard grads.
