this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
39 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

715 readers
376 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Do not let the armies of bile-spewing neofascists on social media fool you into thinking that neofascist intellectuals are nonexistent; any movement can gain intellectuals. That being said, while Kirkegaard has at least some of the form nailed down, he is too clumsy to manipulate anybody who is not already inclined to agree with his politics.

For starters, Kirkegaard does not build up to his conclusions by seducing his audience with a series of facile truths, like a more competent manipulator would. Instead, he trusts his audience to already agree with the dubious conclusion that intelligence is measurable rather than a matter of opinion. Simultaneously, he trusts his audience to take evolutionary psychology without a grain of salt.

Kirkegaard also makes the amateur mistake of letting his mask of professionalism slip by injecting his research with subjective language or, in other articles, taking potshots at somebody. Although it is less prominent in this particular entry, I think that we can still see something that clearly does not belong here:

This suggests some kind of confounding factor, e.g. Asians living in more removed or sexually liberated places (choose your own description!).

Of course, the elephant in the room here is the author’s laughworthy assumption that preference for certain body parts is in any way correlated to intelligence. What is to stop somebody with (say) a doctorate from preferring buttocks over breasts? The answer is nothing. Contrary to what evolutionary psychologists believe, there are plenty of ordinary men (including White men) who are otherwise attracted to women yet simply do not find breasts sexually arousing, as Clellan S. Ford and Frank A. Beach documented in Patterns of Sexual Behavior.

However, the crux of Kirkegaard’s tosh is not merely that favouring breasts over buttocks likely means that you are ‘more intelligent’, but that your race is ‘more intelligent’. Yes, White supremacists, not being satisfied with disparaging other ethnicities as ‘unintelligent’, also feel the bizarre need to disparage their sexual preferences. I can only assume that neofascists see something ‘homosexual’ and therefore ‘weak’ or ‘feminine’ about favoring buttocks over breasts, because otherwise I am unsure what they hope to accomplish here. I have no doubt that they feel entitled to police others’ sexual preferences, but that does not explain why they would devote any attention to this.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] juniper@hexbear.net 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i must be a massive fuckin idiot then

[–] juniper@hexbear.net 19 points 2 weeks ago

if ur an AuDHD gal with a dumptruck ass holla at ya boi

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 21 points 2 weeks ago

These men would unironically benefit from letting their dicks do their thinking for them. There is no way their dicks could come up with anything as stupid as this.

[–] LadyCajAsca@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago

I was almost wondering why a 1800s philosopher had a paper about sexual preferences but no, it's someone else that has the surname 'Kirkegaard' being a white supremacist..

[–] la_tasalana_intissari_mata@hexbear.net 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

what about those who like personality

[–] OffSeasonPrincess@hexbear.net 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] la_tasalana_intissari_mata@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What's ligma like a new greek letter?

[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's the guy who made Mac computers.

the girl reading this

It's sort of like when your favorite D&D Monster Manual entry is the Mind Goblin

[–] adultswim_antifa@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Umechan@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I can only assume that neofascists see something ‘homosexual’ and therefore ‘weak’ or ‘feminine’ about favoring buttocks over breasts

It could also be racist. There is the whole stereotype of black guys loving big asses.

[–] AnarchoBolshevik@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That is what he claims:

Using international and subnational comparisons across English and Spanish and two different sources of search interest, we find that Africans are more interested in butts and more intelligent people are more interested in breasts.

Assuming that this is correct, what is wrong with this preference? Surely Kirkegaard is not so simple as to believe that Black humans approving of something makes it wrong.

[–] Umechan@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don't know what he actually thinks and I don't care enough to guess. Maybe he's sincere in his beliefs, or maybe he's doing it just to be racist. Or maybe he needs to prove to himself that his love for titties is not only valid but virtuous and a sign of high intelligence. I don't know, and I don't care enough to delve into the inner workings of a white supremacist's mind.

But I do still wonder why he's got to be so weird about it. If someone made a fake study to prove that their kink for fur suits, pegging, or rimming was actually a sign of high intelligence, they'd probably get ruthlessly mocked online.

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

If someone made a fake study to prove that their kink for fur suits, pegging, or rimming was actually a sign of high intelligence,

brb, it's time to do some science, baybee

[–] katabat@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

what if you're a woman and like boobs?

[–] Umechan@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It means you need to partner up with another woman who likes boobs to trigger an infinite intelligence glitch. The more you feed into each others' love of boobs, the more intelligent you both become.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago

ultimate sigma maneuver: being into butt and boob

[–] Umechan@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Probably doesn't need to be mentioned, but it wasn't published by a legitimate journal.

Edit: It was explained further in one of the links that OP posted that the journal was actually started by the writer's own foundation, which makes things look so much worse. Imagine being such a charlatan that there needs to be a conflict of interest for your pseudoscience to get published in a fake journal.

[–] deforestgump@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

Woke moralist.

[–] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 10 points 2 weeks ago

That being said, while Kirkegaard has at least some of the form nailed down, he is too clumsy to manipulate anybody who is not already inclined to agree with his politics.

seen-this-one

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

Ok I really gotta read 1800 german philosophy

[–] DickFuckarelli@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As The Only True Leftist in the western world, I provide equal attention to both.

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

yeah i'm a centrist, the left and right cheeks both make good points

[–] blunder@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago
[–] someone@hexbear.net 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What Kirkegaard failed to consider was how everyone has a butt.

[–] Umechan@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, his entire theory sounds very anti-male to me.

[–] ComRed@hexbear.net 6 points 2 weeks ago

When you support a childremoved zionist but consider yourself an intellectual.

[–] 10TH_OF_SEPTEMBER_CALL@hexbear.net 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm a feet guy, am I smart?

nah fr i like my wifu's face

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

I couldn't read through this without chuckling at the absurdity of it all.

And I'm literally a proponent of the theory of a cosmic battle between fucking and cumming.