this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
467 points (99.8% liked)

politics

29401 readers
2999 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Last month, Donald Trump’s administration assured the US Supreme Court that the president’s massive tariffs were intended to address an “unusual and extraordinary threat” and were “essential to the country’s future.” This weekend, Trump announced that he was jacking up tariffs on Canadian goods by another 10 percent—because he was angry about a television ad that ran during the World Series.

Ten days ago, Ontario—Canada’s most populous province—released a TV spot featuring former President Ronald Reagan explaining at length why tariffs are generally bad. The ad edits the Gipper’s speech and omits a bit of nuance about his support for a narrower set of temporary tariffs imposed in 1987 on Japanese electronics. But overall, it provides a pretty accurate picture of the GOP icon’s free-market economic views.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 82 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Canadian government needs to buck up and reinstate the Digital Services Tax, which they scrapped to curry favor with trump in hopes of getting him to lower tariffs. By now they should have learned--capitulating to the bully doesn't work. You have to punch right back and harder.

[–] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 33 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Stop enforcing DMCA and DRM protections and create an industry around circumventing US companies digital markets

[–] despoticruin@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago

This is the way. It wouldn't harm a single regular US citizen, instead it would target multi-billion dollar corporations. I'm all for this plan of action

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 66 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I have an aunt who was under the impression that Trump was found innocent of his crimes. I explained to her that he was convicted on 34 counts and only stayed out of prison because he was elected. She refuses to believe it.

[–] vividspecter@aussie.zone 38 points 5 months ago

And there were multiple other trials pending that were only abandoned because he was elected.

[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

I realize it probably won't matter, but you can send her this link: NY Court Records: People vs Donald J. Trump

If she thinks it isn't a real site, have her search for something like "new york court records".

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 59 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Custard has a thicker skin than Trump.

[–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Too bad that thin skin doesn’t make him bleed out

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago

Haha never thought of that!

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

MAGA voters refused to vote for a woman because she would "be too emotional to lead"

The pedophile in charge gets angry when the weather changes and he thinks he's being sabotaged.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Men can be astonishingly emotional and irrational, too.

And Trump? Trump doesn't have a microgram of rationality or logic or respect for science and facts in his mind. He never did.

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago

I worked with someone who generally had this view, considered himself a constitutionalist. When we were talking about stuff like socialized healthcare, he would get agitated and combative, and if we said something like no need to get angry/emotional were just having a discussion he'd loudly say he wasn't angry/emotional, he was being logical. They redefined their emotions and feelings as logic so they could always be right.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 12 points 5 months ago

More proof that he belongs in a nursing home and not in the now Soiled House.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If this man can't get democrats to realize the stakes and unite and apathetic voters to realize their error and become active, well, I don't know how to finish that sentence because I have 0 faith either will happen.

I'm just angry that my Country hasn't gotten strategic deterrents to our neighbors who refuse to take their lithium, because this is clearly not going to stay within their borders.

I'm so infuriated by the people who even now still play the "both sides" games because they're the people who are truly in the "center" of American politics, cashing the cheques that marginalized people are now paying being actively discriminated against and being disappeared off the streets.

Their fucking idealism led them to market for the fascists.

As for the fascists, they're a lost cause which is why I didn't even bother addressing them. Time spent addressing them is time spent not reaching out to the reachable.


We're just going to keep seeing crazy headlines as America spirals and at some point the American media might stop posting the crazy headlines, at which point we'll know the right wing billionaires will have won.

Dont worry though, somewhere, somehow, a pretend leftist will be grinning like "see, if you just did exactly what I wanted..." as any last semblance of freedom leaves the USA for decades if not centuries to come.

We are so far gone people aren't even remembering that a president is not supposed to be able to arbitrarily set tarrifs.

They're supposed to be slow to enact for a reason. They're not effective used for petty revenge or rather are foot guns that shoot all of our feet when used this way.

I'm just so God damn angry at so many people who should have known better, and so anxious as I watch this massive train derailing that will eventually hit my house on the side of the rail tracks.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You could use that to explain most of the current timeline.

The deranged and racist old Faux "News" viewer got mad at TV during Obama presidency, ran for office on a campaign of hating Blacks, immigrants, etc...and now we have the likes of Stephen Miller and Hegseth trying to completely revamp everything, including the culture.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

The problem is that he is galvanizing a huge part of the country who think exactly the same as him. And though they only really represent around a third of the total voting populace, they are bolstered by the die hard republicans who robotically vote R on every ticket every time they are at the ballot box.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago
[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Perhaps if people would stop capitulating. Seriously. Fuck that guy. He's a moron and a pedophile and a rapist. Treat him like the idiot waste of space that he is. If all world leaders would look at him openly with disdain and not just do what he wants, then maybe he'd catch a clue.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago