this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
97 points (100.0% liked)

news

24698 readers
746 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 37 points 5 months ago (3 children)

gonna need some anti-ship missiles tho

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 41 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Oh man can you imagine if the first aircraft carrier the U.S. loses gets destroyed by Venezuela? Lol

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 21 points 5 months ago (2 children)

legit i was just thinking this. the headline reminded me of that line about how empires collapse inward from the periphery.

so the natsec apparatus having the door slammed on its junk trying to reassert itself over the largest oil reserves in LatAm would be on brand as hell.

now combine it with the constellation of the federal shutdown / uncertainty over troop pay + the AI bubble bursting taking out some big banks at the knees (another uncertain bail out?) just while some have extended loans to the randroid Milei and all bets are off. personally, if SNAP craters, i think the most populated state with the worst buffer and social support network is Florida, which is home to some pretty significant military bases in terms of projecting forces over LatAm. that's a novel stew.

i was thinking earlier about how the resilience of the system here can probably weather 1-2 big problems at a time, but this administration seems content to not resolve them while pretending they don't matter. so its pretty possible that we can enter a scenario where multiple structural problems interact to create a complex scenario that doesn't have a linear solution.

and lets be real, i am not seeing anything going on with this administration that would imply they can respond competently to a novel problem. they have like one play (attack immigrants and minorities) and i dunno how much harder they can push that button before it breaks.

[–] sexywheat@hexbear.net 16 points 5 months ago

its pretty possible that we can enter a scenario where multiple structural problems interact to create a complex scenario that doesn't have a linear solution.

nicholson-yes

[–] jack@hexbear.net 8 points 5 months ago

so its pretty possible that we can enter a scenario where multiple structural problems interact to create a complex scenario that doesn't have a linear solution.

lenin-laugh

[–] mx_oceanwater_they_them@hexbear.net 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This reminds me of the sinking of the Moskva in the black sea smh, spooky similar.

Side note: Russia and the US are eerily similar as well but also opposites in some ways (huge country by area, low population density yet urbanized, huge expensive army, ....).

[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 3 points 5 months ago

I can, and I love it.

[–] coolusername@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

I want ansar allah to do it though. American exceptionalism as CIA propaganda would be crushed immediately

[–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 38 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Xi please do this one fucking thing

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 7 points 5 months ago

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ Dongfeng 21s, take my energy! ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

They have some, but all relatively short ranged. The biggest threat to US ships would be Kh-31 supersonic cruise missiles launched by Venezuelan Su-30s, with a maximum range of 38-60 nautical miles (nmi)/70-110km. But I highly doubt that the Venezuelan air force gets off of the ground in the event of war. Even if they do do get off the ground, the SM-6 missile (launched from AEGIS equipped ships or F/A-18s) has a maximum range estimated in excess of 200 nmi/370km, and the AIM-120D (launched from F-35s, F-22s and F/A-18s, as well as other fighters) has an estimated maximum range of 90-100nmi/160-180km, and the AIM-120D-3 in excess of that. Venezuelan aircraft are far out ranged by US anti aircraft missiles.

Other than that they have some Iranian patrol boats with Iranian versions of C-701s, subsonic cruise missiles with a range of 20nmi/37km. They may also have a single frigate (and maybe some patrol boats) in service with Otomat Mk2 or C-802 subsonic cruise missiles, which have a range of around 100nmi/180km. But that's their longest range anti ship missiles. Again, vastly out ranged by US anti ship missiles or aircraft. AGM-158C LRASM has a range in excess of 500nmi/925km, SM-6 can also be used in an anti ship role, then there's AGM-84 H/K SLAM-ER with a range over 155nmi/270km. AGM-84 Harpoon between 70-120nmi (130-220km) depending on if surface or air launched. That's not mentioning that US aircraft could just drop laser guided JDAMs or SDBs on Venezuelan ships.

[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

you ever play the game Command: Modern Operations? you'd probably be good at that.

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I've looked at it a bit, but the big issue is that it uses public estimations for the capabilities of systems. That makes perfect sense of course, but it's very different to real world performance. Unless you can put your own values in for system performance (which militaries using similar software do for wargaming), it's more of a strategy game vs a predictor of real world performance.

[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think you can modify all that stuff iirc, but I don't know if it would be worth the hassle. There's so much stuff there.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 16 points 5 months ago (4 children)
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 18 points 5 months ago

Not sure it can be considered "cold" while the US is killing civilian boats off the coast.

[–] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 9 points 5 months ago

what do you mean you've seen this - it's brand new? / s

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

These are Igla-S/SA-24 Grinch man portable air defence systems (MANPADS). Basically equivalent to the Stinger missile in NATO. Maximum range of 6km, and an altitude ceiling of 3.5km for the Igla-S.

This poses zero threat to fixed wing aircraft, who can just fly above it's maximum altitude ceiling. Gadaffi in Libya also had hundreds of these at least, and they did nothing. For rotary aircraft (helicopters) that's a different story. They fly low enough to be in range, and it's a significant threat. But these MANPADs require the operator (the solider slinging it over his shoulder) to visually acquire the target first. There's no radar, but it has a built in infrared sight, so the operator can use the Igla-S at night. There's still the limit of actually seeing the target before it sees you at very short range, with lines of sight and things like that. Attack helicopter pilots do train for that, to exploit the terrain.

The implication by Maduro here is more what happens to this stockpile of 5000 MANPADS if the government falls in a US regime change operation/coup, along with shoring up domestic support among those who don't know the specifics of how thse systems work. Maduro and the Venezuelan government know that these MANPADS pose a minimal threat to fixed wing aircraft in combat operations, and will do little to deter the USA. He's trying to position himself as a rational actor in terms of being in control of the stockpile, maintaining law and order. With the implication being that if he is arrested or killed and the Venezuelan government falls, that this stockpile of MANPADs will end up in the possession of basically anyone, and that will be an impossible situation to control.

[–] aanes_appreciator@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That seems like a desperate play from Maduro. IIRC it's not that unlike the shit Gadaffi and Saddam tried to to serve to the Americans.

The US is more than happy with letting some stingers go missing just like they have all across Syria. As long as the heavy equipment is dismantled or shipped off to Ukraine they'll risk a few civilian airliners for that sweet, sweet black nector.

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 1 points 5 months ago

Gaddafi did the same yeah. It's desperate, but the situation is desperate if war breaks out.

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm so depressed over this

[–] sexywheat@hexbear.net 9 points 5 months ago

Yankee go home amerikkka