this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
266 points (98.2% liked)

Not The Onion

18463 readers
634 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Hey Leon, ask GROK:

is building a tunnel across the Bering straight stupid?

Building a tunnel across the Bering Strait isn’t inherently stupid, but it’s a colossal challenge with questionable practicality. The strait is about 55 miles wide at its narrowest, with harsh Arctic conditions, deep water (up to 170 feet), and seismic activity from the nearby Pacific Ring of Fire. Engineering a tunnel in such an environment would push current technology to its limits—think extreme cold, ice pressure, and the need for ventilation over such a long distance. The Trans-Siberian Railway and Alaska’s sparse infrastructure mean connecting road or rail networks would also require massive investment. Cost estimates for similar mega-projects (like the Channel Tunnel, which is shorter and less hostile) suggest a price tag in the hundreds of billions, potentially exceeding $100 billion. Economic returns are dubious: the region’s low population (e.g., Nome, Alaska, has ~3,800 people; Chukotka, Russia, ~50,000) and limited trade volume don’t justify it. Alternatives like ferries or air transport are cheaper and more flexible. Geopolitically, it’s a headache—Russia and the U.S. aren’t exactly cozy, and China’s involvement (as floated in some proposals) adds complexity. That said, the idea has symbolic appeal: linking North America and Eurasia could foster long-term economic and cultural ties. Some studies, like those from Russia’s 2007-2013 proposals, estimated a tunnel could handle 100 million tons of freight annually, boosting trade. But the logistics, environmental risks (e.g., disrupting Arctic ecosystems), and political will make it a long shot. It’s not stupid—just wildly ambitious and likely impractical with today’s tech and economics. If you’re asking for vision, it’s bold; for pragmatism, it’s a stretch.

that sounds pretty stupid.

Yeah, when you boil it down, the Bering Strait tunnel’s a pipe dream that sounds cool on paper but falls apart under scrutiny. The costs are astronomical, the logistics are a nightmare, and the payoff’s shaky at best. It’s like trying to build a bridge to the moon—bold, but probably not worth the headache.

" suggest a price tag in the hundreds of billions, potentially exceeding $100 billion."

" trying to build a bridge to the moon—bold, but probably not worth the headache."

AI is the future.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 63 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If that can keep Elon Musk busy, I'm all for it.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 59 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It will involve corruption and graft of your taxpayer money, tho

[–] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] deadcream@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago

What doesn't?

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 week ago (4 children)

All this does, is convince me that Putin is a moron, too.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

Build a tunnel under an ocean in a seismically very active area. So much genius, so much 4D chess.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago

Nah, these are loyalty tests by dictators, to prove that they will follow them no matter how crazy the idea is.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

unless he's doing it to make the US spend money on nonsense.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

He just blew $180M on a ball room.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 53 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ah yes, Elon Musk, who’s famed for the quality of his tunnels

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Remember the trapped miner incident where he called someone a pedo

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think that was a trapped minor incident. The trapped miner incident happened around the same time, but didn't involve Elon.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

It was a group of kids trapped in caves. Professional divers were working to help, Musk sent a stupid submarine that could not fit anywhere. When he was told that he wasn't a genius, he called the diver a pedophile.

And remember the Tesla ventillators in 2020 that were going to save us all? Never used.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

So yeah, it was about minors (children) trapped in a cave, not miners (the profession).

But in fairness, the Chilean miners I was thinking of was back in 2010.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] littletranspunk@lemmus.org 52 points 1 week ago

What I expect to happen is he'll promise it, get funding for it, do a mile of it, drop everything about it, report a higher wealth value, get into a suspicious one car crash

[–] Siethron@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Personally? By hand? Please?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Given the distance required, what kind of economic payoff could be possible from such an expensive project? It's not like overland would be a cheaper transport option than Pacific shipping routes or anything. It's not just the Bering Strait being the problem with connecting the two after all, but the fact that there's nothing in NE Siberia or NW Alaska to bother connecting together. Are we making it for the polar bears maybe? Or are people going to drive the thousands of miles from Juneau to Vladivostok to sightsee?

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago

To move military equipment.

[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

this is to make the soviet land invasion easier….

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sure, everyone through one access point. How's life at West Point?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Soviets had no intention to invade the united states (though they did want us to have a communist revolution, but like that's just part of communism). This is all capitalist Russia

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly a tunnel to northern Alaska would be an amazing trap for invading armies. There's just miles of rugged mountains before you even find a road. Then you get to deal with Canada....

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That will be great when the first earthquake undoes the tunnel

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

They solved that problem when they cut the USGS.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok Bering Strait, so only geopolitically, geologically, and financially insane.

Like I kinda see a world where this is a good idea. If ww2 had sparked a long brotherhood between our nations and with europe a high speed rail across the tundras might be a good lower carbon alternative to flying and the Bering Strait is the most land based path between Eurasia and the Americas. Personally I'm not certain a tunnel is better than a bridge for this, but a few days train ride from cascadia to Moscow or Beijing would have plenty of takers if everyone was chill and could take a high speed train ride from Moscow to Madrid (and major cities in between) and from Beijing to Ho Chi Minh City, Seoul, Bangkok, etc. It would leave flying as really only necessary for Australia and island nations like Japan.

That's however not the world we live in, and Americans aren't clamoring to go to Russia or trade with them

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

No bridge can be built in that severe climate.

[–] Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Its probably a standard Musk project. Show futuristic marketing pictures/videos of round pod-style futuristic vehicles to billionaire oligarchs and clueless politicians with a buzzword salad, until the hype brings in investors. Interest in his companies goes up, the imaginary price of the company goes up, his imaginary gold pile gets bigger.

Then pocket the money and fail miserably delivering even a fraction of the promised things.

The tunnel in Las Vegas, Hyperloop, Cybertruck, Robotaxi (still in progress afaik) Tiny House, the electric freight truck (I don't remember its name), the various Mars projects just to name a few.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

the electric freight truck

only working with Frito-lay to move potato chips. Literally the least dense load possible.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sounds like it would make Alaska a lot easier for Russia to annex one day...

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Sounds like it'd be really easy to drown a whole invasion force really quick.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Surely, Russia of all countries, would understand why it's a bad idea to invade a region that is cold AF and makes logistics an absolute nightmare. *gestures broadly at WWII*

Of course, this is the same county getting their ass handed to them by Ukraine, a county 100x smaller than they are.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Russia absolutely doesn't understand that, look at maps over time of the country, their control of Siberia is not as old as you'd think. Vladivostok was ceded to Russia in the mid-late 19th century

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He needs to build a tunnel to life in prison

load more comments (1 replies)

OK, but it has to be from the east coast going across the Atlantic, and you have to pay for it all.

[–] YetAnotherNerd@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago

He can’t even build one in Vegas…

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago

It'll certainly make it easier for Russian forces to assist our military and ICE in rounding up citizens, so there's that.

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly, I welcome them putting their army underground in an extremely obvious tunnel, it's perfectly safe and they should definitely try this

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Giving it to Musk is a way of guaranteeing it will never get done. Still waiting for full self driving, Elon.

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Could be neat if Detective Miller engages arthropod-robot form to offer people a ride down said tunnel, all the while reminding riders to check doors and corners.

Can we also have a tunnel dug to the moon?

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

Elon is smart enough to not ride his own rockets, he too will be smart enough to not enter his own subsea tunnel. Which is a shame.

load more comments
view more: next ›