this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
111 points (95.9% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

42503 readers
115 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When you put it in correctly over and over but the bot checking it can't realize it's correct ironically. Also CAPTCHAs are getting worst in frequency and complexity. It's not complex because it's advance, it's complex because they blur, distort, and skew the holy life out of the text or image so you can barely even tell what it is anymore.

CAPTCHA stands for Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart but they use bots to see if you are/aren't a bot. Infuriating.

Update: how could I forget, in a lot of cases when you do a CAPTCHA you are training AI to recognize the correct image. You are training bots, ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฌ that is the holy grail of irony

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] DemBoSain@midwest.social 7 points 3 days ago

I get captchas on a lot of websites when I use a VPN. On the VPN, it's impossible to solve the captcha, it just keeps repeating. The only way to pass the captcha is to turn off the VPN.

I'm using a lot of archive sites lately.

[โ€“] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

If you get annoyed at captchas, try this game: https://neal.fun/not-a-robot/

[โ€“] NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com 26 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I believe sometimes they fail no matter what because of a condition on your end.

Iโ€™ve encountered this behavior when Iโ€™m connected to a VPN or on Tor or sometimes because Iโ€™m running Linux. I think they will sometimes fail no matter what under these circumstances because the website is too lazy to actually put some effort in additional steps to vetting you.

[โ€“] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, if they fail twice in a row when I know I completed them correctly, I don't bother a third time.

[โ€“] Liome@pawb.social 8 points 4 days ago

Most of the time I don't bother at all if it's anything more than "click the checkbox".
I guess I'm a bot, eh?

[โ€“] django@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 days ago

I once recorded myself solving captchas for several minutes, as it just kept asking for more. I finally accepted, that I am, apparently, a robot.

Isn't this the whole reason why proof of work captchas are being developed?

[โ€“] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Reportedly, this training of bots is a thing of the past. Google used to do this, make people put in the street numbers from Street View or blurred words from book scans. But from what I read this isn't really necessary any more, AI and computer vision got better and what we see these days is just wasted effort, it doesn't contribute to anything except tell if you're able to solve the challenge and how you move your mouse while doing it. I wonder why they still do all the zebra crossings and motorcycles and fire hydrants, though. Looks like a synthetic dataset to me, because pictures repeat on a regular basis and they're not that hard... I'd certainly expect less repeating pictures and more occlusion and weird ones if this was training for something.

[โ€“] NKBTN@feddit.uk 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm impressed by Facebook's new method. AI generated images of 4 stacks of rocks are generated, and you have to choose the image containing a stack with the specified number of rocks. Much better than deciding whether the section of image containing a couple mm of handlebar counts as a square with a motorcycle

I absolutely cannot with these. If it asks me about motorcycles I skip or refresh until it gives me something else

[โ€“] Eheran@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean someone is checking the results? They just compare your answer to others. You can even get things wrong, like missing a crosswalk, if others did the same mistake. I never spend any amount of time on these and click as fast as I can. It usually works.

[โ€“] lunatique@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Other websites exist. If you know you know. You probably don't visit the sites that have implemented the annoying and aggravating ones

[โ€“] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's a strange response. Why not show some examples rather than being so vague?

[โ€“] lunatique@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

You think I keep track of the sites hese stupid CAPTCHAs are on? I don't.