this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
407 points (97.0% liked)

politics

25910 readers
3174 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

It was the answer ten years ago now we are in an authoritarian technofacist oligarchy that is “disappearing” people…..womp womp. Day late and a private airplane bribe short there NYT

[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

I'm here for the headline but the content was disappointing. Mamdani got more votes for his mayoral primary win than the Republican who beat Osborn for the Nebraska Senate in the general election (Mamdani 573k in round 2, 499k for Fischer (R), 436k for Osborn (D)).

So who does this guy talk about for most of the article? Osborn, of course.

Look, I get that there will probably be a mix of Osborns and Mamdanis and everything in between and probably even outside of that landscape. There will be people I will have to hold my nose and vote for because they will go after the literally evil billionaires preying on all of us, even if we won't get their support for marginalized groups.

Even Ta Nehisi Coates said that he would have supported FDR in his recent sit down with class traitor Ezra Klein, even though FDR sold black Americans down the river.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 105 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

NYT? is that the same NYT that was telling Democrats for decades that the only reason they aren't winning is because they aren't Republican enough?

OK, gift article, you have my attention...

...nah, it's just more of the same


edit: I was listening to a Cory Doctorow interview yesterday and he had some very interesting things to say and I was reminded of this article again. Talk was long, interesting and meandering, but this was one of the things that reminded me

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 30 points 4 days ago

The moment I saw it was NYT, my eyebrows were raised.

And yep. It's the same BS.

[–] TheGoldenV@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Thank you for the TL:DR flavor text.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 78 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Oligarchy destroyed the social contract and forced nihilism amongst the youth. It's why the entire world is tilting authoritarian. Democrats need to pivot hard into proper wealth taxation otherwise things will only devolve further. It's a moral imperative at this point.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 42 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Americans need to learn to differentiate between the vehicle and the driver. The democratic party will not affect change until the vast majority of it's sitting members are primaried.

No need to fix an election when the rich own all the horses in the race.

[–] 0tan0d@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It would be nice if people under 50 showed up to the primary. Most incumbent wins are just old people using name recognition to "not rock the boat".

[–] nanoswarm9k@lemmus.org 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, everybody under 50 has to work at the capitalism on Tuesdays.

We're technically 'allowed to leave', but will fall behind on rent immediately. All three sick days have been used up.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yea we keep making random national holidays on every day but voting day. Its crazy how we can just add a banking holiday when ever, but chose not to do November 5th

[–] nanoswarm9k@lemmus.org 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Louder for DC ig.

Maybe we just write the bills and invent semi convincing press releases for them now as ratification.

Turning it over a few ways... How would that be for a all in general strike day? pro and con. Mostly pro?

I mean the big problem is always actually The Bills, The Job, The Kids/Dependants, getting there. (and i.d. if you can't afford to rent an address).

(edit, add last paragraph)

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

A general strike would be nice if it went with a political gathering. Striking the current system while trying to rebuild or reclaim what’s worth keeping. A general strike without a cohesive demand and plan for the future is going to be wasted.

[–] nanoswarm9k@lemmus.org 2 points 2 days ago

general strike/bbq holiday until it becomes national?

The more I live to think on it, the more I think tailgating(sport potluck in farm machinery) may be the missing piece of the modern american strike in mainstream thought.

relatable mobile potluck.

It's absolutely there on the ground in left protest culture. I mean, any protest big enough or long enough eventually has real anarchists doing their classic number of show up to feed everyone, with alergy and creed options, usually.

Personally I can stand some YeeHaw if everybody gets equity.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago

forced nihilism amongst the youth

As they say, idle hands spend time at the genitals!

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wealth taxation may be an important men's to an end, but in our discourse we need to emphasize more what benefits would be planned for the tax revenue.

Reducing the wealth of greedy assholes is nice, but by itself only gets so far.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yea. that's kind of the problem, no one in power has a plan for education, healthcare, housing, wage stagnation, two-tiered job market, or anything really. But one of the benefits would be not running up a deficit. We spend way too much on interest payments, and we really don't see the pay off for the money being borrowed. It's time for a new government the old one broke itself with greed.

Even in Canada they are they trying to enact patriot act style legislation to appease American companies... and there is not now, nor has there ever been, a terrorist justification for it.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 3 days ago

Man. FUCK the nyt.

[–] ChaosCharlie@lemmy.ca 80 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 84 points 4 days ago (7 children)
  • NYT "Eat the Rich Populism": Angrily posting memes at a few select right-wing billionaires and a bunch of foreigners, particularly in China

  • Actual "Eat the Rich Populism": Nationalizing critical infrastructure that's being horded by the billionaire class in the aggregate

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Pull up the societal ladders that allow people to become billionaires in the first place. Transferring a nations wealth from 5 pairs of hands to 10 pairs of hands once a generation is not a realistic long term governance

load more comments (6 replies)

After FDR the establishment has done everything possible to prevent this.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Democrats are the crisis that they manufactured

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 43 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (15 children)

IMO people need to rally behind new progressive candidates and primary more than 50% of the sitting party in 2026. About 75% of the party are incompetent at best and complicit at worst.

People need to look past the individual members of the progressive caucus like AOC and realize the monumental organization it took to get her elected.

Republicans fix elections. Democrats fix primaries.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Progressives need messaging and a concise platform. 'Fix housing, healthcare, inflation, immigration, monopolies, LGBT rights, income inequality, unemployment, gerrymandering, climate, education....' Everyone who's even capable of listening past 4 objectives knows they're not all going to happen and assumes that means they're all bullshit.

I've really been liking "Tax wealth not work" but I'll take anything stronger than "return to normalcy."

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 7 points 3 days ago

I’ll take anything stronger than “return to normalcy.”

You mean the normalcy that allowed Trump1.0 to happen in the first place, and allowed Trump2.0 to grab and pervert as much power as he has now? I fully agree, there is a larger lesson to be learned from all this than "phew, thankfully the Democrats won this time, and Trump can't run again". There are systemic problems behind all this.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Progressives would naturally do better in elections if they didn’t have 2 parties spending billions of dollars to keep them out of power.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Progressives need to fully commit to grass roots electoral organization.

Republicans fix elections, democrats fix primaries.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The comments section is closed with a pinned request of the author shocked he got backlash.

I wish I could follow up with this guy.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Probably call the editor for approving it.

[–] MrSmiley@lemmy.zip 14 points 4 days ago

Democrats have been discussing strategy since their loss in November. They’ve come up with use populist rhetoric for elections but stick to neoliberal policy.

Oh is it finally time to eat?

load more comments
view more: next ›