101
submitted 11 months ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 23 points 11 months ago

They were perfectly fine with it over the past couple decades when it was helping keep them funded.

[-] authed@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago
[-] Zastyion345@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago
[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Similar to how they did the same when we paid them to back in the late 90s.

[-] lntl@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 11 months ago

The US pulled out

[-] regul@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

They're the government now and are funded through taxes, so they can afford to be truer to their own beliefs.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 11 months ago

The war ended. They always said it was a temporary measure to raise funds for their insurgency, and I guess they meant it.

[-] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago

Anyone who thinks this is a bad thing needs to strongly reconsider their values.

[-] bubbalu@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago

Doing more meaningful action on the 'war on drugs' in two years than the US ever did!

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 11 months ago

Huh. So they actually followed through.

I guess being highly ideological cuts both ways here, as per usual.

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
101 points (93.9% liked)

World News

32112 readers
1211 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS