this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
61 points (95.5% liked)

chat

8505 readers
197 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

oh are we gonna co-exist with the Nazis?

it also seems like a lot of leftists will say they are anti-authoritarian but then say Nazi lives don't matter. It can't be both.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Anti-authoritarian "leftists" are liberals that recognise that liberalism is bad but have not fully committed to the idea of replacing it. They wear the aesthetics of leftism because it makes them feel like they're not bad human beings but because they have not fully committed to replacing it their instincts are still to support and reinforce the status quo.

They are liberals that feel guilty. It is necessary to challenge them for not fully committing to moving on from liberalism. They must not be allowed to feel absolved of guilt just by wearing leftism aesthetically, they must be pushed into remaining guilty in order to convert further and fully commit to the left.

Only by being challenged and made to see that they are still liberals will they make the effort to fully move on. They re-label themselves to remove that guilt and must not be allowed or else that will be the furthest they progress leftwards.

[–] Cimbazarov@hexbear.net 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Anti-authoritarian" but also conveniently never criticize authoritarianism done by liberals

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Anti-authoritarian leftists" are just anarchists, right? Literally every anarchist I've ever known is constantly shitting on liberals, very often specifically about authoritarian behavior/policy

[–] Bob_Odenkirk@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Anarchists are ‘authoritarian’ if they’re willing to use force to achieve their political goals.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

I think it's well established at this point that anarchists and 'auth leftists' have a different definition of authoritarian (and 'state' for that matter)

It seems similar to that old debate about 'reverse racism' vs racial prejudice- the sociological definition of racism includes oppression, but the dictionary definition didn't/doesn't, so people were largely arguing over semantics

Anarchism obviously is a very large umbrella, and part of the whole having everything decentralized and not have a central authority dictating everything means anarchists tend to expect people to have different ideas of what anarchy means, and for those to more or less co exist. Same way as there wouldn't be a universal authority, there wouldn't be a universal moral code. So while all would be definitionally anti-authority, that doesn't necessarily mean anti-violence. Indeed, I think we can all agree on some violence that is justifiable, for example in self defense.

Part of the beauty of free association is that it acts as a sort of decentralized justice system. If there's a person doing truly awful things, such as a Nazi, you may face no real consequences for your actions. But another action, even if less harmful in magnitude but for less justifiable reasons, could see stronger repurcussions by virtue of people no longer associating with that person.

(And of course, this kind of violence would largely only be considered justified in situations where both transformative and restorative justice have failed to resolve the issue)

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

They should be, but a some of these people (sometimes still call themselves "anarchists") see the West/us/NATO as the "lesser evil" which (assuming they are westerners) makes them no different from a liberal.

[–] THEPH0NECOMPANY@hexbear.net 33 points 1 week ago

"Anti authoritarian leftists"

same-picture

Western chauvinists with us-foreign-policy

[–] IncensedCedar@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The trick about the word authoritarian is that while most people have a strong negative reaction to it, different groups have wildly divergent understandings of what the word means. This leads to confusion and hard feelings. Some people define "authoritarian" based on structural hierarchy, rather than exertion of control. Ask 10 people of different ideological persuasions to define the word and you will get 10 wildly different answers. And also many people define the word on a purely vibes basis, which is quite frustrating Personally I don't use the work much because I don't find it that useful.

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

And also many people define the word on a purely vibes basis, which is quite frustrating

This. I could see someone equating "authoritarian" to fascist, which then leads to OP's post becoming this absurd nonsense:

I know too many anti-[fascist] leftists

oh are we gonna co-exist with the Nazis?

it also seems like a lot of leftists will say they are anti-[fascist] but then say Nazi lives don't matter. It can't be both.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

Sorry pal, defending yourself from murder is authoritarian totalitarian political violence

[–] bigpharmasutra@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All of our problems will be solved with another peaceful protest.

The video of the ICE raids in Chicago yesterday (or today I can't remember honestly) should immediately disabuse you of the notion that this strategy will ever bear meaningful fruit.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

which video? drop a link if it's still in your history

[–] bigpharmasutra@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

I honestly don't remember where I saw it but there was some white woman yelling in the background "he's a citizen! he's a citizen!" while this poor bastard was getting gang tackled by around 8 different ICE thugs. Everyone else was hanging around and filming or running out of the way.

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You see this a lot with the Russian SMO. Too many "leftists" are very comfortable with leaving their analysis at the door of "neither Washington nor Moscow" and leaving their positions eerily absent of any part of fascist Ukraine and instead pontificate about Putin's desire for a new Russian empire and how he is homophobic.

It is very difficult for them to see the true analysis of the conflict from a dialectic instead of weighing "good" and "bad" things on their personal ideological scales and adjusting their thoughts accordingly (never mind that the have their thumbs on the scales against Russia)

[–] limer@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t understand the contradiction.

[–] Blep@hexbear.net 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Killing nazis is authoritarian.

[–] TerminalEncounter@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is it? Didn't anarchists fight against the actual Nazis when they fought Nazi backed Franco during the Spanish Civil War?

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, and they wielded the unmatched authority of bullets to do so

[–] Enjoyer_of_Games@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

In the matter of fascists I defer to the authority of the bullet bakunin-immortan

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago

I'd still consider that wielding authority.

[–] limer@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The word nazi is overused. If I switch that word with “oppressive authoritarians in power” does that cover the same situation?

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The word nazi is overused.

Piss off Charlie

[–] limer@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It’s used to describe a wide selection of people. Someone who is a bigot, beats their family and is a generally a bad person might not be a literal nazi.

But in USA politics it often means gop or trumpers. A very wide group .

Others may define it as any who want to restrict rights.

It’s really hard to tell at times

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago

But in USA politics it often means gop or trumpers

"Guys you can't call the people who are literally deporting brown people to concentration camps and outlawing trans people Nazis, that's not fair"

[–] SmithrunHills@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

Someone who is a bigot, beats their family and is a generally a bad person might not be a literal nazi.

Right-wing chuds: "We will kill, torture, and kidnap any and all persons of a marginalized identity. Whether queer, black, Asian, disabled, homeless, Arab, Muslim, or women. We will also literally perform the actual Sieg Heil in public, use every form of white supremacist dogwhistles available, and cheer at the mass murder and genocide of geopolitical adversaries overseas."

You: "Hmmm idk guys, they definitely seem bad but they aren't carrying a copy of Mein Kampf on their person at all times 24/7 and quoting Hitler all day, or wearing a Nazi outfit in broad daylight. Maybe we shouldn't call them Nazis because it's really hard to tell."

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

It's not that hard to tell.

[–] LeninWalksTheEarth@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

yes

nazi is overused

lol k.

[–] Blep@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago

Yes, you are using your authority to remove theirs

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

The word nazi is overused.

i agree, we have too many living nazis and not enough stormin' ex-mormons.