The pro environment part of me: π±
The pro Ukrainian part of me: ππ₯π₯π₯
News and discussion related to Ukraine
Community Rules
πΊπ¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
π»π€’No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
π₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
π·Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
β Server Rules
π³ Defense Aid π₯
π³ Humanitarian Aid βοΈβοΈ
πͺ Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
The pro environment part of me: π±
The pro Ukrainian part of me: ππ₯π₯π₯
The only way to stop our dependence on fossil fuels is to make them commercially nonviable.
Ukrainians working hard on cutting global emissions, what is the rest of the world doing?
I dunno that burning an oilfield is really the best solution to cutting emissions...
Long term it is.
While it's burning, it emits a bit more, since the combustion of whatever's in there is less complete. Then it stops.
It's not the oil fields, but refineries and pump stations for the pipes.
These are refineries not oil fields. They turn oil into gasoline, diesel, kerosene and much much more.
that tally is wildly optimistic. last time i've checked, one of latest strikes, the one on kirishi, disabled some 30% of capacity (it's too big of facility to have only one oil processing stream, so there are two in parallel. the one disabled had a bit under half of capacity, and the other one is using all slack capacity it had) and only for a month or two. some of strikes listed are from year+ ago
even with that, some 20% of oil processing capability is disabled (or was at some point), and further decrease would mean that decline in oil extraction is needed because export of crude and storage can't keep up. which means that some oil wells would get disused, and if these are down for some time they can't get restarted easily
update: salavat refinery was hit like, 2h ago
Do you mean the equipment will take time to set back up? Oil wells actually produce a bit better for a while after they sit, because pressure gradients slowly equalize.
There is a little bit of fine print about that if you look closely.
yeah, that's the wildly optimistic bit
Great context addition to the graphic!
This sparks joy π₯°
This brings joy to my heart.
Lol this is starting to look like their Black Sea fleet chart. Keep 'm coming UA!
Russian propaganda: That black sea fleet retreated to the ground of the ocean to take better positions there.
Why is the Orsk Refinery burning in blue?
It's flooded due to a poorly constructed dam collapsing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orsk_Dam_collapse
Next? I would love to see the same ones hit hard enough that they're for sure completely knocked out.
more damage is done, if they are repairing it, and your hitting the refineries, it makes it more expensive for them.
Expensive damage is good, but if the lack of production can cause logistical issues, that would be even more expensive
There is no such thing as "for sure completely knocked out". If nothing else, you can build a completely new facility on the same plot of land. And that would be "the facility having been repaired". Ukraine is damaging the facilities so that they are off for long enough. And currently it seems that the percentage of Russian oil refinery capacity off line is growing slowly but steadily.
It costs money keeping them off line, but it costs tenfold or hundredfold that much to get them back online. It's a sensible deal!
I mean yeah. I didn't intend to sound unimpressed, I was referring to the tiny asterisk at the bottom of the graphic. I want that factoid about total production to be true, is all.
Which ones are next?
All of them. π