postmarketOS and Arch wiki? That's very weird, aren't both plain mediawiki? Works really well on my Firefox. Even works on SeaMonkey.
EndeavourOS/Manjaro forum probably uses Discourse... I don't get why people like that forum software :/
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
45 points (78.5% liked)
Linux
58379 readers
1744 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
probably uses Discourse… I don’t get why people like that forum software :/
I don't either. It hates minority browsers even more than Cloudflare does, doubles down on this by using unnecessary bleeding-edge Javascript constructs, and every instance of it I've ever seen looks ugly as hell.
I don't get why people like that forum software :/
feature packed with a really clean and user friendly UI + each distro can easily customize it to add lots of their own brand identity (Manjaro especially appreciates this).
I don't have a problem with it not loading correctly, and it loads quickly even on somewhat slow internet (using Firefox).
it feels like a "web app" more than a website. Like, it somehow needs to "load" after loading the page.. unlike classic forum softwares that just instantly show the pre-rendered page.
this is personal preference but the ui also feels way too 'simple', hard to navigate and has low info density. i guess this is how more people nowadays prefer things to work
it feels like a "web app" more than a website. Like, it somehow needs to "load" after loading the page.. unlike classic forum softwares that just instantly show the pre-rendered page.
I kind of like this behavior. If you're writing a complex website with user posts, comments, tags, and other nifty stuff and want it to stay modular it's almost guaranteed that you'll end up with this loading behavior (unless you want to SSR everything).
ui also feels way too 'simple', hard to navigate and has low info density. i guess this is how more people nowadays prefer things to work
Don't know about that, I find it easy to navigate with the consistent sidebar elements. Searching for posts is easy since they're usually well tagged and have good titles. Searching for solutions and checking out community contributions and votes is about 90% of my use case for a forum. Maybe you have different use cases.
Forum software is like exactly what raw html/css was made for, i don't understand the need for slow js bloat
Archlinux site has been targeted by a DDoS attack recently and apart from that it always works great on any browser/engine
ironic
Alanis, is that you?
It's like rain on OPs wedding day
A free ride when they've already paid
The good advice that they just won't take is spot on for the Arch Wiki, though.
??? Arch Wiki is just plain html and css? You might be experiencing the ddos arch services have experienced lately. In any case I've not had any problems on Librewolf, although out of the websites you listed I only regularly visit the Arch Wiki and occasionally the PostmarketOS site.
Manjaro forum maybe,but postmarket os site and arch wiki is static sites for me it's working very fast in firefox
Most sites run as well, if not better, on Firefox for me.
If you're running a quick and dirty test, you might not get an accurate picture of the performance differences. For example:
- Your usual browser might have cached some content from the last time you used it
- Unless you kill them properly, your computer might not have the RAM/processing to be running two browsers at the same time with the best performance
- One browser might be bogged down with extensions / issues that built up over time
You could try giving Firefox a clean install, or opening it in ~~safe mode~~ (it's now called troubleshoot mode), to see if there's any difference
-- that or plugins/extensions
these sites work well for me too and i also use firefox on all of my devices.
Chrome is just faster than Firefox. I use Firefox, but I do it despite its performance, not because of it.
In the 6 years I've been with Firefox on Linux on my 9-year-old laptop, I could count on both hands the number of sites that didn't render correctly, and on one hand the number that didn't run or weren't performant.
Maybe I'm just lucky, but I definitely feel for folks who are stuck with Chrome and all those ads.