this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2156 readers
40 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 8 points 4 days ago

More vibe coding wins in the wild. Soon we will be out of a job here.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Promptfondlers on lobste.rs are unhappy about the tag "vibecoding", used to denote development using GenAI. I'd not recommend reading the thread, just want to observe that if slop coding had actually taken the coding world by storm, I doubt there would be much pearl clutchign about how slop-slingers are treated on the site. We're talking about people willing to pay Scam Altman money monthly after all.

https://lobste.rs/s/gkzmfy/let_s_rename_vibecoding_tag_llms

[–] self@awful.systems 8 points 5 days ago

shoutouts to @dgerard@awful.systems and @mawhrin@circumstances.run for reminding me that Steve Klabnik being really shitty isn’t a temporary state of affairs

[–] antifuchs@awful.systems 4 points 4 days ago

There’s not a whole lot of clear info out there but it looks like the Tesla “dog mode” (the feature you’re supposed to rely on when you leave a dog in the car so the dog doesn’t overheat and die) is prone to failure and has recently killed a dog.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 4 points 4 days ago

Nice and lengthy sneer against AI in academia came out a couple days ago - highly recommend reading.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Small point, but I heard nitter is run by chuds, xcancel is better.

E: I always get clowdstrike and cloudflare confused, which were the ones who protected the nazis again and which ones were the ones who took down the internet for a day? ;) (Ha, the last page even leaves out this incident)

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Are you thinking of nitter.poast.org? That's run by the same guy behind poa[.]st, a really awful pleroma instance.

iirc, xcancel.com became popular before nitter.net was revived.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 3 points 4 days ago

I don't know the guys behind it, just repeating what others have heard. I'd have included a source if I had one sorry.

[–] yellowcake@awful.systems 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Is “triangle man” a slur I’m unaware of or a goofy name to be calling someone for whatever reason?

[–] pikesley@mastodon.me.uk 7 points 4 days ago

@yellowcake @irelephant it's... from a TMBG song

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago

Vercel's logo is a triangle. Unless there's extra context I'm missing.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

there's a place called r/nuclearweapons where people come, collect declassified and FOIA'd info, do some maths and speculate on how nukes work. 7d ago they had an incident where reddit admin removed a couple of posts from one user https://www.reddit.com/r/nuclearweapons/comments/1n4c1i3/we_had_a_thing_happen/ head mod stepped down in a response

four days later this thing surfaced https://www.reddit.com/r/nuclearweapons/comments/1n75vej/our_schmuck_from_doge/ linked article https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5464437-ai-nuclear-weapon-detection/

so probable sequence of events is that someone from anthropic talked up some bozo from doe or somewhere else, bozo from doe ran confabulation engine on some part of internet, and then notified/threatened reddit admin, who complied by removing some rando's account. whoa they must have saved quadrillions of americans by that brave action

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

96% accuracy. So... unusable. That is an extremely high rate of failure.

Imagine how often it triggers on just people talking about hearts of iron 4 alone.

E: read more about it:

we achieved a 94.8% detection rate for nuclear weapons queries and zero false positives

'zero false positives' Sure bud.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

why is everything about these people so fucking stupid

access to nukes is limited by availability of fissile material. not maths of it, not supremely complex engineering because it's not that hard, not by money, not by access to ores, not anything else. it just requires one of two very specific, expensive and slightly dangerous to operate facilities which is well within budget of any serious state actor and unless diplomatic or military action is taken, a state that decides to get nukes will get them. this is the case now and has been for the last 50 years or so

but yeah some idiots wowed by chatbot will Save the World. this also puts that weird block on claude's biology topic filter in much stupider and doomerist light e: it does not escape my attention that thehill ran an article based entirely on anthropic blog post

[–] saucerwizard@awful.systems 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Its a real fun subreddit if you’re into that kind of thing.

[–] ShakingMyHead@awful.systems 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Anthropic to pay 1.5 billion to authors

That's... quite a bit. I wonder if we'll start to see more complaints about people reaching their token limit "prematurely" or if Anthropic will release a $1000/month "unlimited" plan or something like that.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

given the run rates all these fuckers have, I half expect they feel glad it’s “as low as it is”. couple of the authors I’ve seen speak about it reckon pay out better to them (once off) than they tend to get from book royalties (I saw chisnall and some others post around it earlier). precedent from this is probably a good thing, even if I wish it went harder (esp given how likely “a fine you can afford is just a tax” is to develop as a normal situation)

re burn rates: openai confirmed in the last day or so that it expects a $118b burn through 2028. fucking obscene

[–] ShakingMyHead@awful.systems 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

According to the article, it could be higher than 1.5 billion, though by how much they don't really say. But they're estimating about $3000 per book. For a class action that actually seems extremely high.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

But compared to the anti piracy fines for sharing music from decades ago it is pretty low.

Saw people suggest it was because the judge doesnt want to kill the goose that is laying pyrite eggs.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 5 days ago

yep, I was seeing some folks reckon it might be 20~30x what they’d make in later royalties. I’m not knocking the suit or the value to authors - mostly just wishing it were more so it might cause an even sharper effect

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 1 points 4 days ago

customer: "why is my FSD not working? I've got my hands off the wheel but I'm stuck in a parking spot"

tesla support: "nono, you misheard, it's Fool Self Driving!"

(source (archive))

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I love how one of the benefits of crypto is anonymous money, but you have to upload an ID to buy some anyway.

[–] yellowcake@awful.systems 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

I love how it’s a public ledger of transactions so once a wallet can be identified to an owner, everyone can see what you’ve done. Not very great system to keep anonymous.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 6 points 6 days ago

And if you want to avoid that, you have to use a coin with some form of automatic money laundering built in (e.g. Monero), which brings its own legal problems for you and everyone working with you.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago

The "solution" crypto-people have for this is to go to a "bitcoin meetup" and give people cash there. Or use an exchange that just ignores the regulation.
I am not going to a fucking crypto-meetup just so I can send someone €10 worth of bitcoin.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 9 points 6 days ago

Yet another lawsuit has hit Midjourney, this time coming from Warner Bros Discovery.

[–] saucerwizard@awful.systems 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Did you guys know Hugo de Garis went full time MGTOW a few years back?

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I didnt know anything about him, not even who he was, but DuckDuckGo search suggestions suggested I search for him and mgtow, so the search engine knew. First link shows he isn't mgtow, he is a masculinist. https://profhugodegaris.wordpress.com/masculisting-the-mgtows/

His wikipage on his beliefs is wild. Legit beliefs skynet or eclipse phases TITANs will attack.

Quote from his site a free book he provides: "MASCULISM : Men’s Rebellion Against Being Manslaves to Women, An e-Textbook of 370+ Masculist Flyers for Men’s Studies Courses”"

Manslaves rise up you have nothing to lose ~~but your money in the divorce~~ as half your stuff was hers anyway.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

is this where Yud gets his style from? jesus fuck.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The more you read the worse it gets. And sadly, no all these manosphere dweebs write like this.

(A lot of them also credit Heartiste, which is why his popularity, enough for Scott to publish the anti-heartiste faq, which he didnt write. Was such a bad sign. (Also the guy is a neo-nazi racist, openly hated black and jewish people)).

Edit: And from Hugos blog: (source: https://profhugodegaris.wordpress.com/masctemp/)

"With a video you get not only the content, but can also see the emotion behind the content. Initially I only put up a video link to YouTube, but since the CEO of YouTube is a Jewish feminazi who censors and even terminates whole masculist and MGTOW video channels"

Look anti-Semitism. The fucker.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 5 points 6 days ago

First thought: "Who?"

Second thought: "No, Hugo"

Anyway, I know nothing about this guy. His wiki page listed an imdb page, and know you get to know that he has a Bacon number of 3.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 5 points 6 days ago

New premium column from Ed Zitron: Why Everybody Is Losing Money On AI

load more comments
view more: next ›