this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
447 points (98.5% liked)

politics

25552 readers
2354 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pistcow@lemmy.world 143 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 32 points 1 week ago
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 92 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Never listen to a centrist again when they tell you "how things have to be" to win an election.

[–] handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 60 points 1 week ago (27 children)

Such a tired bit of propaganda. Y'all need to acknowledge that while we wouldn't have had progress under Kamala we also would not have had Alligator Auscwhitz, a near doubling of homeland security's budget, illegal kidnappings/deportations, the US military policing American cities, tariffs, RFK Jr., honestly I could keep going.

She ran a shit campaign, people were dissatisfied with the former administration. She should never have been there, but all those that decided to abstain damned us all.

It's like sitting one a sinking ship, throwing all the life jackets overboard, and complaining "well I didn't sink the ship".

Now millions of people in this country from those in the LGBTQ community to immigrants live in fear. Because some people thought they were so morally superior. Well congrats.

I don't even like the democrats, but I'm at least capable of realizing that sometimes you have to pick what causes the least amount of harm. Sometimes you can't have an ideal outcome. I'd rather run off the road than plow through children crossing the street. Neither are a good option, but only one is morally correct. And no taking your hands off the wheel and complaining isn't a moral option.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly. Now instead of only continuing the genocide that was never going to be stopped regardless of the outcome of the election, we get a second genocide right here at home.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That you take the former as given is the whole reason the Democratic party has like a 20% approval rating. People don't vote for parties that just act like bad things are just immutable facts of life, especially when it's blatantly obvious that the bad thing could be changed if the political will existed.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Very sound logic.

Probably won't comfort trans people when they're shoved into death camps, but for a brief moment you got to feel superior. So that's gotta count for something right?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I voted for Harris and the people you're losing are the ones who don't care about feeling superior, they just don't feel like voting is very important and dumb statements like "regardless of who is elected, this bad thing won't change" reinforce that idea.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly that's a fair point. I feel like this is a major failure of our civics education.

If we did mandatory voting, made election day a federal holiday, and treated it like a much more important civil duty the results would be wildly different.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Imo it was a damned if you do, damned if you don’t situation for Democrats; which is exactly what Republicans, Israel, and bad actors crafted the situation to be.

If the public stance was not Democrats being 100% for Israel, then they believed they would have lost the election because of the political PACs and donors flipping to fund the opposition.

Given how much money the lobbies that were pro-Israel were pushing into the campaign trail, any candidate that didn’t take that stance in a close election was for sure at risk of losing their donor vote.

I still think Democrats should have done more, such as saying they would fully step into the situation to prevent the loss of more lives for both Palestinians and Israelis. It also didn’t help that Biden was pro-Israel and expected Kamala to be lock-step with his stances while on the campaign trail.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You can write as many paragraphs as you need to feel better but a Harris win was never possible. Our political process has been completely captured by a class of billionaires. The working class have no representation. Elections continue only as a means to accelerate partisan culture war distraction to keep the working class divided. The outcome was pre determined. Direct your anger at billionaires not working class people.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I reject the assertion that there is absolutely no chance and our elections are predetermined. They're dug in real deep and have an insanely strong influence but there is a chance as long as elections continue to happen.

Also just because the billionaires are the enemy doesn't mean the common man can't be wrong. When it comes to a class war I'm more than willing to let bygones be bygones. But that doesn't mean we still can't discuss the poor actions of our peers.

[–] thejoker954@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Just watched a legal eagle video on helldivers that gives a nice little primer on managed democracy.

Folks here should watch it. Not that it would actually get them to pull their voluntary blinders off to stop spewing bullshit propaganda about how the democrats can and will save us.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok then why reject Mamdani in NY and Fateh in MN?

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't?

I love Mamdani. Personally haven't heard much about Fateh but if their policies are similar sign me up.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

I don’t mean you, I mean the DNC.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 84 points 1 week ago

0% of Democrats happy with state of the US right now

MAGA: That's how we know we're doing the right thing!

[–] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 1 week ago (3 children)

While 76 percent of Republicans say they are satisfied with the direction of the country

What the absolute fuck?? These fucking people would be happy with the direction of north Korea. Decades of relentless propaganda have really done a number on these people and destroyed their critical thinking

65% of Republican voters are ages 50 and over, these people don't really care about anything except their retirement accounts. So long as Republicans can keep the stock market growing they don't give a shit.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When they are unseated in the midterms, we should deport them to pyongyang

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

How do those protest votes feel now, assholes?

(to those voters, obvs)

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm glad I voted for Harris and I'm not complicit in shipping someone's family member to a concentration camp or helping a pedophile get elected.

Some would argue this as a bad move, but considering Gaza will be a parking lot by December anyway, congrats, benchwarmers. You played yourselves.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 week ago

I'm with you. We can't know if she would have taken a different stance on this, but at least we wouldn't have a mugshot hanging from buildings in the capital where martial law has been instituted.

[–] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Currently democrats are having a registration crisis while Republicans are having a boom, so pretty good?

Like you'd think those numbers would be opposite, maybe they are a continued indictment of the DNC democratic party that continues to ignore any candidate who has organic support like Mamdami.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 week ago

Never underestimate DNC’s ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I dropped Dem for DSA in 2016.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 11 points 1 week ago

I think voting for a D in the general is generally a good harm reduction strategy. That said, I'm a big fan of the Working Families Party, tho they aren't active where I'm at. They seem to be "more practical" at gaining political power, while still fairly well-aligned with the DSA about how it should be used.

I, too, started looking for something "left" of the DNC in 2016; I was a fan of Bernie [and other progressives].

[–] FatCrab@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I was just listening to an explanation of this effectively fake bit of information this morning. Basically, at least in MA and other states like it, both dems and republicans saw a drop in registration because registrations work differently now. Where registrations are automatic, they don't default to a party affiliation and you have to actively select such, which most people aren't going to do. As a result, an absolutely enormous proportion of registrations are now unaffiliated and BOTH parties are more or less taking a hit--however, because Dems get more registrations historically anyway and many of those are now no longer going in to register just party affiliation, they seem disproportionately hit. End of the day, not much is really changing that we can understand from the voting registrations, but we'll see what happens in the midterms.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Given that democrats are going along with fascism and throwing progressives under the bus after the primary, vindicating.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you'd have to be braindead to be happy with the state of the US right now.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately a lot of Americans are.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago

Gallup's polling found Republicans were essentially just as dissatisfied with the direction of the country in July last year as Democrats are today. However, the partisan gap at the time was 35 points because only 36 percent of Democrats were satisfied with the country's direction at the time.

ouch

[–] fort_burp@feddit.nl 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So they are going to change their electoral tactics, right?

Right????

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Yet they keep supporting Republicans at ever corner, at every step. If. A Republican drops something, a Democrat will go "ohh, let me get that for you"

What the fuck has been going on with the US for like the past 6 decades or so?

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

Good! As a Democratic Strategist I can USE this Information to CONVINCE the DNC to go even FURTHER Right to Court the Republicans who ARE Happy with the US! That's the ONLY way we can WIN again!

[–] zedbite@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

i can see why

load more comments
view more: next ›