this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
47 points (92.7% liked)

Electric Vehicles

1602 readers
40 users here now

Overview:

Electric Vehicles are a key part of our tomorrow and how we get there. If we can get all the fossil fuel vehicles off our roads, out of our seas and out of our skies, we'll have a much better environment. This community is where we discuss the various different vehicles and news stories regarding electric transportation.


Related communities:


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The one thing people care about the most, the charging speed, is not mentioned in the article. I fucking hate that I had to look it up after searching the shit article.

"Charging Speed: DC fast charging upgraded from around 50 kW (with longer charge times) in 2011 to up to 150 kW in 2026, enabling a 10–80% charge in just 35 minutes at compatible chargers."

Here's a better article:

https://cleantechnica.com/2025/08/21/new-2026-nissan-leaf-shows-how-far-electric-vehicles-have-come-in-15-years/

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Do most people care about it? I'm currently shopping for an EV, and all current models I've looked at seem to have fast charging times of about 30 - 35 minutes, give or take a few. It doesn't seem like there's a noticeable difference there to be a comparison point

[–] MrQuallzin@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I recently got a 2025 Kia Niro Wind and it's top charging speed is 85kW. Nowhere near top speeds, but it was more then enough during a recent road trip. I hadn't factored the speed in my research (was still learning at the time), but honestly now that I know more it still wouldn't be something I consider.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How long does it take you for 10 - 80% at that speed?

[–] MrQuallzin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

No idea, haven't had a need to try yet. I'm generally charging on a level 2 charger at home, and during the trip we'd charge in 20-30% chunks as needed

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If you were told it would take 2 hours to charge from 10%-80% at the fastest speed, would you care about it?

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yes, I care. I use my EV to make a 240 mile trip every two months. I stop to refill after the guess o meter says I have 80-90 miles left in my tank.

Is there a current gen model that does that? Like I said, they all seem to be within a few minutes of each other

[–] _core@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Its still damn expensive. Where's the $15k EVz?

[–] HandMadeArtisanRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Chevy nuts and bolt

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I wish there was a trim that doesn’t have the glass sunroof. I bet they could shave off 1k more if they made the base model have a regular roof instead. Summers are brutal where I live so the last thing I want is more sunlight and less insulation. A regular roof also won’t shatter in hailstorms.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 3 points 6 days ago

You might be in luck. Nissan is apparently going to release a base model called the S sometime soonish. This is the mid model release, like what Nvidia does with their GPU launches.

I also dislike the whole roof sunroofs because they tend to be terribly echo-y in every Uber I've been in. Feels like I'm in a McDonald's tube slide.

[–] BingBong@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I have the same challenges. Can anyone chime in that has experience with these full glass roofs on cars in the desert?

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I'm in Florida and have one. It does get hotter then the car without. I coated the roof with a UV reflective material. It helps a lot but still not as good as a normal roof.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 2 points 6 days ago

I have a glass roof but live in Los Angeles, though I’ve spent time in the Arizona desert. Honestly, I never thought about it.

[–] ShieldsUp@startrek.website 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The exterior design introduces flush motorised door handles, a first for a Nissan production vehicle

I really don't like these handles! I do like the overall look though.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Looks like a fun little nugget and would absolutely be a contender for me but the last thing I want is Nissan reliability on the door handles.

Nissan is only beaten out by Hyundai in "Number of cars I've seen with missing door handles."

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Why does it have to be so high off the ground and have such huge wheels with thin tires? I get that EVs need the battery pack under the floor, necessitating a higher seating position and roofline, but why such big ground clearance?

Edit: The more I think about it the more I feel the thin tires are the worst part. EVs weigh more than other cars, and those rubber-band looking tires mean those fancy wheels are gonna get shattered at the first pothole.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think that’s an intentional optical illusion. The black trim on the bottom goes pretty high up, and the trunk curls up from the ground quite a bit, and there is a higher up protrusion on the front bumper that makes the the bumper look higher than it is. The combination of those three things make the eye follow a base line that’s higher than what actually exists.

My guess is that they waned smaller wheels and a lower ride, but they know Americans like crossovers and big wheels, so they did some magic tricks with the trim.

IMHO, it kind of works. It fooled me until I really started scrutinizing it.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

As an American who doesn’t want a crossover and big wheels: I hate it here.

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Eh, I like not having to climb to get in and out. I also like being able to see over other cars parked on the street at intersections.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

The first one? Fine. But the day I can’t climb into and out of my fun car is the day I give up driving entirely.

The second? That just leads to an arms race of taller and taller cars.

Maybe eventually I’ll be able to see under y’all

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 2 points 6 days ago

I was about to buy an eGolf right before they yanked it off the market. These gigantic Tesla-adjacent vehicles are disgusting.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

To each their own. I don’t dislike the industrial design. I particularly like the tail lights.

The chrome plastic on the bumper and the drive mode selector are what feel the weirdest to me. They look cheap. Poor material selection.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

It’s okay, it just means I gotta keep my gas cars on the road longer.

Unless we get the electric GTI and they don’t ruin it by making it a goddamn crossover

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I actually prefer higher ground clearance because of the shitty roads on my city. Potholes and random deep dips on intersections can easily mess up the undercarriage of the car, let alone an EV with batteries there. The thinner tires I agree are not good.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I have shitty roads, too, so I get that.

But high ground clearance with rubber band tires and fragile alloy rims doesn’t make sense.

Though I’ve seen plenty of giant SUVs with the same setup so maybe I’m just weird.

No, I am weird.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 1 points 6 days ago

Thin wheels are favoured for EVs as the Scrooge sacrifice rolling resistance for greater range but take away from dynamic grip