this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
607 points (99.5% liked)

Privacy

3525 readers
106 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Spotify is now asking UK users to prove their age to access mature content
  • The age verification checks have been introduced as part of the UK's Online Safety Act
  • Spotify says it will present age checks if it suspects you're under 13, but many users have encountered checks despite being over 18

Spotify has become the latest app to introduce measures designed to comply with the UK's Online Safety Act, by asking users to undergo age verification checks if they want to view or listen to age-restricted content – and many users aren't happy.

The age verification requirements of the Online Safety Act came into effect from July 25, and requires all platforms that display adult content to verify that users are over 18 using age verification checks.

So far, we've seen the likes of Xbox, Discord and Reddit introduce age verification, and now Spotify has done the same.

Latest Videos From TechRadar

Like Reddit and X, Spotify has partnered with digital identification firm Yoti, a service that conducts age checks via facial scanning. For Spotify users, Yoti will use different means of age verification, from facial scanning to requesting a scan of your ID if it suspects you’re under 13 (Spotify’s minimum age requirement).

It will also use algorithmic methods to estimate a user’s age. But Spotify is taking it a step further, stating in its official outline that "your account will be deactivated and eventually deleted" if you fail to complete the age verification process.

While Yoti claims that your data will be kept safe, and eventually deleted, the new requirement has caused uproar among some Spotify users.

Some have take to forums such as Reddit to point that young people are clever enough to find ways around the checks, for example using a VPN to change their location to somewhere other than the UK – and a minority have even threatened to revert to piracy (see below). What is ‘mature content’ in Spotify?

A phone on a green background showing a Peaches album on Spotify (Image credit: Spotify)

This is the burning question among Spotify fans, considering the music streaming app doesn't host X-rated content on the same scale as Reddit or X. However, the platform does have certain features that are aimed at mature users.

In Spotify's case, you may be asked to verify your age if you try to "access some Spotify content and features, like Music videos that are labeled as 18+ by rightsholders". This could also apply to podcasts that discuss mature content and songs with explicit lyrics.

Fortunately, there is a way back if your account becomes deactivated due to an inaccurate age estimation. According to Spotify, you'll get an email that "allows you to reactivate your account within 90 days of deactivation", after which you'll need to go through age verification checks again.

So far, I haven’t been asked to verify my age in the Spotify app when trying to access mature podcasts and music videos, but a handful of users on forums like Reddit who are well over the age of 18 have have already encountered the checks. Why have VPNs become so popular?

Spotify has explained in various community posts that it isn't designed to work with VPNs, and you naturally shouldn't use one to circumvent any age verification checks.

However, this hasn't stopped free VPNs from dominating Apple's UK App Store, as internet users look to find ways of protecting their data from future breaches, or perhaps even bypass those checks completely.

VPNs work by encrypting your internet traffic, but they're not all equal – so it's important to choose the right one for your needs. Free VPNs can log an excessive amount of data, which could ultimately put your privacy at risk, and sometimes lack important security features.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dudesss@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If you buy your music, say on Bandcamp Friday where Bandcamp waves their revenue, you could host your own streaming server, and eventually cancel your Spotify membership.

https://isitbandcampfriday.com/

https://www.navidrome.org/

https://github.com/navidrome/navidrome

There is also Qobuz as an alternative which pays the artist $. 01873 per stream, as opposed to Spotify's $0.003 per stream. About 5x more. Plus you can buy the music from the platform if you want. And it has higher quality audio, family plans, gift cards.

https://www.qobuz.com/ca-en/music/streaming/offers

[–] 21bits@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

I've recently gone back to outright buying my music (CDs mostly for me - I like having a hard copy), and tbh I find I'm actually enjoying the music more too.

[–] ReluctantZen@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Qobuz+navi has been my go to for a while. Sadly, a fair amount of music I listen to isn't on Qobuz (or Bandcamp).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roserose56@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Do it, why don't they do it???? Because they are cowards!
Same goes for Nintendo fans and Nintendo 2, and many other who finally caved.
I'm sick of all these people saying but do nothing

They live from us, not the opposite. We have the power.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I want to support independent artists, not that Spotify gives them a fair share. My plan is to support artists where possible via Bandcamp or merch, but otherwise find a way to acquire music

[–] sylvieslayer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

wait to buy shit at shows instead of online. Bands make more directly from live March sales vs online.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately, many of the artists I listen to don't play near me often.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What? Interacting with people in live environments? In this economy?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Wow look at you affording to go to concerts.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People only threaten to leave but never actually do it because "muh recommendation algorithm"

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Whats a good alternative? I tried last.fm for a while but didn't like the suggestions.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Last.fm has been decent for me.
Also, believe it or not, Youtube. Just looking up the odd song once in a while has resulted in good stuff showing up on my home page pretty regularly.

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Navidrome and lidarr.

  1. Download all your Spotify playlists and listen history from their privacy page
  2. Download the full discography from all the artists with lidarr
  3. Listen to your new music with dynamic recommendations from your downloaded songs with Navidrome.
[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Download the full discography from all the artists with lidarr

Damn, that's gonna be a looot of stuff

probably less than a terabyte, even with flac

[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

No no no, just start torrenting. Streaming services shouldn't exist. They rob you & then geo-block you & then censor you

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 117 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In the words of my forefathers, “Fuck you, I won’t do what you tell me.” 🖕

EDIT: MUTHAAAAFUCKAAAARRRRR!!

[–] somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 days ago (14 children)

My favorite quote. Saving this.

Big tech is always bad.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

If buying isn't owning piracy isn't stealing.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

I never stopped downloading my favorite stuff. I pay for streaming, but I'm not trusting them to give me access forever.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 84 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (13 children)

My jellyfin server doesn't ask for age verification, has no monthly fee, has unlimited skips, can work while offline and allows to download the media. It also can be used in several devices at the same time and has not just music but pretty much any kind of media.

Fuck you, spotify. If people go back to piracy, it's on you.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] DavidGarcia@feddit.nl 54 points 2 days ago (5 children)

wtf is up with this coordinated push to tie your internet accounts to your government ID.

what garbage international NGO is behind it this time?

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Billionaires. Want to increase control.

And 'adult' content is code for queer. Anything else is collateral damage.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think it's just queer content they're targeting, though that is a big part of it. These people are also just puritanical fucks that think nobody should get to watch porn. Same people that support anti-sex worker laws, abstinence education, anti-abortion laws. It's about control and stopping anybody from having any goddamn fun.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 35 points 2 days ago

This isn't an NGO, it's multiple western governments. They want more control and the companies involved want more data.

The end of the anonymous internet was being predicted as the Corporate Web started taking off in the mid-00s. Rumors were swirling about companies like Meta requiring government I.D. at least five years ago.

This ID stuff is almost certainly going to happen this time.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

They always wanted to do it and they are finally pushing it. Governments spend billions in planning their authoritarian shit, perhaps until now it wasn't convenient for them because not enough people used the internet or they had enough control over it already.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Name<=>IP Address<=>Time

Use "save the children" to record and squash political dissent

Next step will be to force VPN's to identify

Then to make ISPs require logging and block non-identified traffic.

We'll be running community wifi pirate networks and off-grid radio text forums in no time.

international NGO

Bitch, it's the same dudes as usual. Nothing "non-government" about this.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

I want to remind people something: you are using this decentralized and open source platform for free.

Spotify is shit but artists releasing their music there is not helping. There are plenty of musicians struggling to live off their career but these in top charts most people listen to are not poor, their are on spotify because it's lucrative.

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 41 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Since when have there been age restrictions on music? Freedom of the arts, anyone?

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

"PARENTAL ADVISORY", once a coveted badge even 😄

[–] skarn@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, except Spotify isn't just a music company. They've been trying for years to get you to use their App for other stuff that's costs them less royalties.

So now Spotify includes all manners of audiobooks and shitty podcasts.

And while we all agree that age verification is bad... If anything ever deserves age verification, it may be Joe Rogan.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 days ago (9 children)

If you're in the US then it's since Tipper Gore, wife of Al Gore, got a bug up her ass. You can find video of Dee Snyder, lead vocalists of the 80's hair metal band Twisted Sister giving testimony before congress.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 12 points 2 days ago (14 children)

I swear if they continue with this kinda shit, I'm gonna go from 'fan' to 'disappointed paying customer'

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Imagine being told that you have to submit your facial scan to an unknown third party to prove that you're old enough to pay to listen to something that's being broadcast over the air for free.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio 4 points 1 day ago

This shit is ridiculous.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Age check for music. The authoritarians have won.

No. They can't win.

Thats the thing. Evil is evil because it doesn't fucking work.

They can only make us lose. That's not them winning.

[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This is never going away no matter how much we hate it and it has very little to do with age verification.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

I wonder how "bad" it really is for a kid to be exposed to nudity (and "worse"!), if actually at all or even the reverse.

Then Bam 18 years old, let's look at beheading videos and 2 girls 1 cup no problemo?

Can we start pushing for it to be illegal to expose children to religion?

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›