this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
24 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2714 readers
96 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

BEIRUT, July 31 (Reuters) - Lebanese President Joseph Aoun stepped up his calls for Hezbollah to disarm on Thursday, suggesting failure to do so would give Israel an excuse to continue attacks and saying the issue would be on the agenda of a cabinet meeting next week.

The comments reflect mounting pressure over the issue of Hezbollah's arms, which has loomed over Lebanon since the Iran-aligned group was pummeled in a war with Israel last year. Washington wants Hezbollah disarmed - a demand echoed by the Beirut government as it aims to establish a monopoly on weapons.

Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem said in a televised speech on Wednesday that calls for its disarmament served only Israel. In a speech to army officers, Aoun said the government would next week discuss Lebanon's amendments to a U.S. roadmap to disarm Hezbollah, deemed a terrorist group by Washington.

Lebanon's counter proposal demands an immediate halt to Israel's attacks, its withdrawal from positions held in the south, the establishment of state control over all Lebanon and the disarmament of armed groups including Hezbollah, he said.

Aoun urged all parties "to seize this historic opportunity ... and push for the exclusivity of weapons in the hands of the army and security forces". He said the government would set a timeframe to implement the steps.

Shi'ite Muslim Hezbollah, backed by Tehran, was the only Lebanese group allowed to keep its weapons at the end of the 1975-90 civil war on the grounds it needed them to fight Israeli troops who occupied the south but withdrew in 2000.

Hezbollah's arsenal has long divided Lebanese, with critics saying it has undermined the state and dragged Lebanon into conflicts. Washington has been pushing Lebanon to commit to disarming Hezbollah before talks can resume on halting Israeli military operations, Reuters reported earlier this week. Hezbollah has so far refused, though the group has been considering scaling back its arsenal.

'PRETEXTS FOR AGGRESSION'

Addressing Hezbollah and its followers but without naming them, Aoun called on those who "have faced the aggression" to "rely solely on the Lebanese state".

"You are too honorable to risk the state-building project, and too noble to provide pretexts for an aggression that wants to continue the war against us," he said.

Israel killed many Hezbollah commanders and thousands of its fighters last year, while also destroying much of its arsenal. The U.S. proposal delivered in June would require Hezbollah to disarm within four months in exchange for the withdrawal of Israeli troops occupying several posts in south Lebanon, and a halt to Israeli air strikes.

Hezbollah had already relinquished a number of weapons depots in southern Lebanon to the Lebanese army in line with a U.S.-brokered truce designed to end last year's war.

Aoun said the proposals to be discussed next week include seeking $1 billion annually for 10 years to support the army and the security forces and plans for an international conference to later in the year to support reconstruction efforts.

Reporting by Laila Bassam in Beirut, Nayera Abdallah and Tala Ramadan in Dubai; Writing by Tom Perry; Editing by Sharon Singleton and Ros Russell

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 32 points 1 week ago

Ah yes, disarming yourself against Israel surely has proven very effective throughout all these years, fucking snake.

[–] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If history has any lessons to teach, a very very obvious one by this point should be that giving up arms in the face of a genocidal settler state will only ever increase the violence done against you by that state. Because it is a fundamentally violent, expansionist project that has 0 interest in peace and does not respect human life. So, a state like that wants you to disarm, you tell them to disarm first. If they say they can't because that leaves them exposed to violence, well then they have answered the question as to why you shouldn't yourself disarm.

[–] rainpizza@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 1 week ago

If they say they can’t because that leaves them exposed to violence, well then they have answered the question as to why you shouldn’t yourself disarm.

If only compradors could be reasoned with 😔

Sadly, they will only change when they are being targeted directly by the imperialists.

[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 1 week ago

Comprador traitors doing and saying comprador traitor things.

[–] Agrajag@scribe.disroot.org 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Pact

For anyone not familiar with how positions in Lebanon are traditionally chosen

Key points of the agreement stipulate that:

Lebanese Christians do not seek Western intervention, and accept that Lebanon had Arab features.

Lebanese Muslims abandon their aspirations to unite with Syria and the Arab World.

The President of the Republic and the Commander of the Lebanese Armed Forces must be Maronite Catholic.

The Prime Minister of the Republic must be a Sunni Muslim.

The Speaker of the Parliament must be a Shia Muslim.

The Deputy Speaker of the Parliament and the Deputy Prime Minister must be Greek Orthodox Christian.

The Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces must be a Druze.

There must be a ratio of 6:5 in favour of Christians to Muslims (and Druze) in the Lebanese Parliament.

[–] Malkhodr@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Clown country set up to be ungovernable. Maybe this is Syrian chauvinism at play, but Lebanese nationalists never fail to confuse me. What the fuck are they actually nationalistic about? Like it's an entirely artificially construct state meant to be entirely incapable of governing because it basically takes the "separation of powers" liberal bullshit to a religious sectarian extreme.

Some Lebanese will staunchly and adamantly refuse to be identified with Syrians, declaring that Lebanon must be its own nation seperatw from Syria. Why? Like what kind if sovereignty do they actually have? The whole country comes off like a scheme for rich Maronite Christians collaborators to endlessly profit off their little theifdom, but the fact that Muslim Lebanese buy into it as well is crazy.

Beirut is amazing from my memory being their a few years ago, but the people in Lebanon are stabbed on the back by their compodor government.

Speaking like this while the US has literally talked openly to Jolani next door about Syria invading southern Lebanon to fight Hezboallah is fucking lunacy.

[–] redchert@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 5 days ago

he whole country comes off like a scheme for rich Maronite Christians collaborators to endlessly profit off their little theifdom, but the fact that Muslim Lebanese buy into it as well is crazy.

The Mount Lebanon Mutasarrifate was literally created just for the maronites on pressure of the west (especially france) with the Règlement Organique. They actually couldnt be a vivable state so they later begged the french to expand their statelet. Similar to Ukraine, Jordan and Austria, its national identity is very bourgeoisie and exists to shield only small oligarchic sects. I guess most of population only bought in as a reaction of the Syrian invasion. (Not to dismiss hezbollah or anything)