this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
38 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24078 readers
340 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

yawn, tell me when we've got the world's first 24/7 robot gooner

[–] WrongOnTheInternet@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago

we literally already have connecting rods and crankshafts

[–] Ildsaye@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Will firms that lease, sell, or do maintenance on robots sophisticated enough to truly approach the interchangeability of human labor, ever match human labor's ability to undersell themselves? Will they ever be as subsidized as human labor is by uncompensated care work and other expenses of social reproduction for which the employer takes no responsibility? How low will costs need to get on versatile humanoid robots for these firms to profitably compete with masses of desperate humans?

Capitalism cannot fully automate, and has no reason to. High-end robot firms are inherently harder to exploit than disorganized masses of hungry people.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Good thing this is being developed in China which is socialist.

[–] TrustedFeline@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They're calling them "workers" cri

[–] Tychoxii@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago

The worker sinks to the level of a commodity and becomes indeed the most wretched of commodities.

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We already have "24/7 self-charging robot workers", they're called fixed robotic arms and they work amazingly well for repetitive tasks. Humanoid robots are interesting as a novelty, but I'm not sure they have much practical use. Best case is if they're able to be installed into a factory with less retrofitting than full fixed roboticization, but I have my doubts of that being more cost-effective (or working at all, for that matter).

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The advantage of humanoid robots is their versatility. A single robot can be adapted to accomplish many different tasks. I don't expect these will compete with fixed robotic arms, but rather complement them the way humans do right now.

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's the supposed benefit, but to do that you'd have to make them more cost-effective than just having humans doing the job, which so far has completely failed to happen. Unless I missed something, there are a whole bunch of breakthroughs that haven't yet that'd be required for that to work.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 months ago

UniTree produces humanoid robots for around 12k a pop already. These types of robots can already do lots of useful jobs that humans used to do. It's not some future thing that requires breakthroughs, it's happening already. Here's one example https://peertube.mesnumeriques.fr/w/jNakB3B5dRoeJkShnVRgDk

This tech is rapidly improving, and it's only going to keep getting better going forward which means robots taking over an increasingly wide range of manual labour. Machine learning is also advancing rapidly right now, and new things are being figured out every day. These types of breakthroughs are happening on monthly basis right now https://github.com/sizhe-li/neural-jacobian-field

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago

My lamp is self charging too you don't hear me bragging about it