this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
264 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24825 readers
1779 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

NPR is kind of just shrugging it off since it's only about 1-4% of their funding as it was, but like everything this admin and Congress does, it's apparently mostly going to fuck with rural people who rely more on it.

That said, Internet exists so I'm pretty sure the blues in the red will still have access.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago

That said, Internet exists so I’m pretty sure the blues in the red will still have access.

Access is one thing, the stories that's actually pertinent to the people is another.

I live in one of those areas where the local NPR stations run stories for the local farming communities, the things that will make a LOT of difference for the people around, the investigative journalism for things that come up for this area. When doing online news... you get a lot of the coasts. One of those local stations is VERY in danger of shutting down with this.

Oh well. I know my local station is going to be okay, those out there, it's gonna suck for them. I'll keep saying it, I'll feel bad for those that voted against it, you have my condolences as we all live in this shitshow together. But those that voted for or didn't bother to vote that get affected by this, well I'll just take the consolation prize of shaudenfruede

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think you might be overestimating how good internet access is in rural areas. My grandparents still had dialup in the 2010s and after were only able to get a 2mbps DSL line that never ran at its rated speed. Satellite internet was then and, even with Starlink, is still very expensive, especially for people on a fixed income. This was also in an area with patchy at best cell reception that only got worse as 4G was being rolled out. Even FM signals were patchy at the house and TV reception tanked after the digital switchover. (This is also why you may have heard about some people fighting to keep AM radio around.)

My grandma’s main connection to the outside world was NPR on the way to work and the state PBS station that was rebroadcast from a somewhat close small college town.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True, and I'm most worried about older folks like that. I think DSL wouldn't have too much trouble with podcasts but it's on demand and many people, myself included, tend to get it more via radio on a commute rather than actively seeking it.

It's probably part of a broader plan to keep these people in the dark, so while I'm not personally impacted, I am worried about the ramifications for others like that.

As someone who had 1.6mbps dsl for a long time (up until 2018), it is plenty for streaming audio. It'll do 480p video pretty well, and depending on bitrate can sometimes do 720p. Multiple users for video streaming is impossible, but should work ok for audio.

[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

A lot of people tune in to PBS as a habit. They leave it on in the background.

They won't be able to do that anymore

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Why do you think republicans wanted to kill net neutrality so badly? You’re about to find out.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

All my favorite stations are publicly funded

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

PBS passport is 60/year.