76
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] penquin@lemmy.kde.social 38 points 1 year ago

But when we ask for help as citizens, "how are you gonna pay for it, huh?"

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Posadas@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago

geordi-no Healthcare, debt relief, child povery mitigation.

geordi-yes unlimited genocide on US designated subhumans

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 year ago
[-] toxicbubble420@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago

or living wage, or affordable housing

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

or infrastructure or child care or

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

The US government only disagrees on matters which support the average citizen. Other than that, both sides are in lockstep when it comes to voting on bills...

[-] ijeff 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They already spend a ton of public dollars on health. The problem is that it goes to insurance companies, administrative staff, and the downstream health costs of inadequate early access to care.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

You're kinda contradicting yourself.

They don't spend public dollars on health. They give it to insurance companies and administrative staff and pharmaceutical companies and other private moneyed interests, and then there's none left for us.

[-] ijeff 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They actually do spend a lot of public dollars on health, it's just spent into a system that isn't efficient. Universal access to care drives down costs significantly across the board - instead they have piecemeal coverage and a system with overall costs inflated by administrative staff hired solely to manage insurance billing and delayed treatments.

It's an interesting area of policy where expanding coverage means lower costs overall.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Vilian@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

how do you think it has the biggest army in the world

[-] Rom@hexbear.net 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This shit is going to pass with full bipartisan support and libs are still going to be confused the next time someone tells them both ~~sides~~ parties are the same.

load more comments (52 replies)
[-] blazera@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

famously poorly armed state of Israel

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

Desperate empire practices policy of War Startups, sends funding to whomever

nukenuke kelly Silica Valley

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

Saigon Valley

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 year ago

Please attach some basic conditions like... don't do war crimes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Truly demonstrates how wildly preposterous it is at its core. Space exploration makes countries focus together on a bigger picture, which everyone's also interested in, and even makes us realize what our taxes are capable of financing. Regardless, its worth it alone just for showing youngsters how fascinating and worthwhile science is as a career choice...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago

The burger regime rn:

[-] faltryka@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

One of these is not like the others.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
76 points (96.3% liked)

World News

32285 readers
781 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS