this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
140 points (100.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

2969 readers
534 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal rule designed to make canceling subscriptions as easy as signing up for them has been struck down by a US federal appeals court just days before it was scheduled to take effect.

The US court of appeals for the eighth circuit vacated the Federal Trade Commission’s “click-to-cancel” rule, which would have required companies to allow consumers to cancel subscriptions using the same method they used to sign up, after finding that the commission behind it failed to follow required procedures under the FTC Act during the rule-making process.

“While we certainly do not endorse the use of unfair and deceptive practices in negative option marketing, the procedural deficiencies of the Commission’s rulemaking process are fatal here,” the court wrote, adding that “vacatur of the entire Rule is appropriate in this case because of the prejudice suffered by Petitioners as a result of the Commission’s procedural error”.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

For those who missed it, the "procedural error" was:

When a proposed rule will cause an impact of more than $100M, a preliminary regulatory analysis is required. The FTC determined that the impact would be under $100M, so did not do the preliminary regulatory analysis. The court decided that the impact was more than $100M, causing the "procedural error" after the fact.

Either it's a bad faith ruling, or, there's even more reason that the rule is necessary as that would mean that companies are leeching off more than $100M from customers through shady and anti-consumer tactics.

[–] jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago

I'd wager that hard-to-cancel gym memberships alone comprise of more than $100 million.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I hope this judge trys to cancel something vital and unable to.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 21 points 2 days ago

Someone got some Amazon gift card ~~bribes~~ presents.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because it's a stupid rule that probably helps everyone but since the homo liberal monsters that don't think in Nazi came up with it, it must go. Anything that protects consumers from fraud must go. Business musnt be impeded.

[–] huppakee@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago

I'm confused, what exactly is homo about these liberal monsters?

[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

after finding that the commission behind it failed to follow required procedures under the FTC Act during the rule-making process.

It literally stands right there

You misspelled "grasping at any technicality for money."

[–] a_person@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Please eu save us ( not usa i mean in general consumer rights)

[–] huppakee@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago

You're out of luck, we've had this for years now and it hasn't turned out to be as contagious as cookie pop-ups have

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Donald has taught us to just ignore rules we dislike.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I mean in reality absolutely nothing, but through the eyes of maga.....dealers choice?