Wait, how is worker on worker race hate part of the Working Class Calendar? This doesn't seem like a celebration of solidarity.
Working Class Calendar
!workingclasscalendar@lemmy.world is a working class calendar inspired by the now (2023-06-25) closed reddit r/aPeoplesCalendar aPeoplesCalendar.org, where we can post daily events.
Rules
All the requirements of the code of conduct of the instance must be followed.
Community Rules
1. It's against the rules the apology for fascism, racism, chauvinism, imperialism, capitalism, sexism, ableism, ageism, and heterosexism and attitudes according to these isms.
2. The posts should be about past working class events or about the community.
3. Cross-posting is welcomed.
4. Be polite.
5. Any language is welcomed.
I agree and second this question.
From the looks of things all these posts are done by a bot, so it's just spat this up as if it's a worker solidarity thing.
Getting in contact with the community's mods might get more help/answers.
I'm only a mod in the community and the maintainer of the bot, not the upstream author of a people calendar, but I think that it's important to not idealize the working class. There have been a lot of defeats in our struggle, and also some very horrible and disgusting acts.
I think that it's good that we remember them, understanding the past can help us to understand our reality.
Marx defined Working Class as those employed by the Capitalist class (the value of their labor being expropriated as "profit"). I take it (seeing as this example is about individuals who are mining gold for themselves) that you're using a more general definition of "anyone who works".
In which case this place is really just about jobs? So this community is just for investigating anything that happens when someone's at work? Does that include unpaid labor (eg. unsuccessful goldminers), and modern things that happen in the work place?
Interesting questions, and I don't have any answers, only some opinions.
-
Marxism defines classes, within a historical context, and in relation to the ownership of the means of production; being a paid and/or subordinate relationship it's important, but it's not the key concept of the Marxist definition. For example, digital platform workers (Glovo, Uber...) are members of the working class, regardless of whether they use their own means (car, bicycle...) and regardless of whether they are paid by the platform or the end user. Since they do not own the digital platform.
-
I do not know the historical context of colonization and mining in Australia in the 19th century. From the Wikipedia article, it seems that there were people who acted individually, people in groups (apparently communally) and wage earners[^1]. One of the Wikipedia references seems to relate it to the working class: “Miners' Rights: explaining the 'Lambing Flat' riots of 1860–61” in Curthoys, A & Markus, A (eds) Who are our Enemies?: racism and the working class in Australia, Sydney, 1978.
-
There are articles that are published that are not directly related to the working class, especially linked to anti-colonialism, feminism, LGTBIQA+… I think it's good that they appear here.
[^1]: > Europeans tended to work alone or in small groups, concentrating on rich patches of ground, and frequently abandoning a reasonably rich claim to take up another one rumoured to be richer. Very few miners became wealthy; the reality of the diggings was that relatively few miners found even enough gold to earn them a living. The Chinese generally worked in large organised groups, covering the entire ground's surface, so that if there was any gold there, the Chinese miners usually found it. They lived communally and frugally, and could subsist on a much lower return than Europeans.
-
I disagree with your interpretation of Marx. Gold rush era Australia is not an example of a stage where workers owned the means of production, Gold is a raw material not a value-added product. Under Marx it's "value-adding", labour, that gets exploited by the Capitalist class. That was his main usage of working class.
-
"Working class" has a culturally colloquial meaning of "anyone who works". Over the years the colloquial meaning has expanded to include areas of cities which are poor or culturally poor. This would include all sorts of people Marx (and many other class systems) wouldn't define as working class.
-
ahh so this community isn't strictly about the working class calendar, got ya.
None of this matters as I've already unsubscribed. Thanks for your work modding, and good luck with your mix of calendar dates of what you've decided qualifies as important dates about, "working people" doing things including occasionally historical massacres.