You mean the table they were already at when your allies bombed them?
The table they returned to after the US unilaterally reneged on the previous deal that had been negoiated?
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
13 points (84.2% liked)
UK Politics
3964 readers
613 users here now
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Why should Iran negotiate with terrorists?
Imagine. Iran was minding its own business, Israel attacked it, now America has joined and our Prime Minister is here bold face telling Iran it's on them to make amends.
The only lesson Iran has learned in the last few days is this: the West cannot keep their agreements; get a nuke as fast as you can to ensure that you won't be invaded.