this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
40 points (95.5% liked)

Legal News

517 readers
95 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Dissenting Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that "there is no constitutional justification" for the decision, and access to gender-affirming care "can be a question of life or death."

Case file: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-477_2cp3.pdf

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 week ago

While I don’t like effect of the ruling, I feel the language is shaping the issue unfairly. The ruling was that trans minors could not claim discrimination because people with other medical conditions that affect normal development could receive them. I feel the issue should be attacked in a different way.