this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
168 points (99.4% liked)

Facepalm

3291 readers
151 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 2 points 27 minutes ago

Wait I can get published by reposting math to nutrition journals? I hope the world is ready for the innovative new Guste Carlo method of integration

[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago
[–] MudMan@fedia.io 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey sucks for her, but remember to run this one by people next time you're in a fight with anti-science crackpots. You could set the entire history of maths into a bonfire and some random nutritionist could rebuild it all tomorrow. Epistemology, man.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

Just wait until you see what the field of sports medicine does!

It’s like a constant speed run of rejected statistics research.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Do nutritionists somehow not have to take calculus in undergrad (or high school, for that matter)?

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago

They teach this at GCSE 💀

It's related to integration, even. Are they next going to tell me they worked out how to get the exact area under the curve by integrating it between two coordinates?

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 23 points 1 day ago

Yeah, it’s embarrassing, but it’s also a compliment. The Babylonians were damn smart. Independently recreating their work is still pretty impressive.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 10 points 1 day ago

IIRC she named it not after herself, but her parents or grandparents...who of course share her name.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

I’m very surprised this got published before anyone mentioned this was a well known and old technique

[–] evujumenuk@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

See? Newton and Leibniz weren't that special after all!!11

In the end, still better than cutting out the area under the curve and weighing it. Isn't that what nutritionists did before Tai?

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn't have thought of weighing party off a physical model. That's really clever.

Impractical obviously, but clever.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

It's just like the water displacement method for finding the volume of an irregularly-shaped object. No biggie.