this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
755 points (97.7% liked)

Aged Like Milk

304 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to all those things in media and elsewhere that didn’t stand the test of time, at all.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dephyre@lemmy.world 96 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 months ago (3 children)

didn't the UN find that they were enriching uranium past what was required for nuclear power, which indicates they're enriching it for nuclear weapons? To my knowledge this is the first time in something like 20 years that this has happened

to be clear, fuck israel for this escalation and their horrific genocide. There is no justification even if Iran had a fleet of WMDs.

I'm genuinely not sure how similar Iraq is to this

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but so is North Korea. Plutonium, that is, not uranium, but still. Who cares? Could you imagine if South Korea just randomly started bombing their "nuclear engineers" + civilians and then US piped in?

No because Kim said nice words to Trump and wrote him a love letter.

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

Totally agree! This situation is unbelievably stupid

[–] MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Were you too young for Iraq?

It was a bit different, Americans were baying for revenge after 9/11, but also many people were adamantly against going to war.

I think there was less evidence of any WMD, everyone knew it was bullshit, but someone had to pay for 9/11.

In this case, the USA doesn't really give a shit about Iran, nobody has a score to settle, but the killer is - and the thing I remember from last time - is that at the beginning everyone was like cut the bullshit - but as time went along the media convinced a majority it was a good idea.

The same will happen here, they just haven't had a chance to catch up yet.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What did Iraq have to do with 9/11?

[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nothing except that it's in the middle east and is majority Muslim.

That's all the American public needed.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Depressingly accurate I think. It resulted in very large protests that achieved nothing here. I wonder if Iran would lead to even more protesting, or if support will be limited to avoid that.

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I was too young. I realize i'm probably splitting hairs. The differences b/w both situations feel large enough that lazily conflating the two feels incorrect, even though they are certainly similar enough to compare.

Trump is somehow a more stupid, meaner W. There's no 9/11 he can use to whip up nationalistic frenzy. Israel has aggressed first & is trying to drag the world into a conflict that's already hugely unpopular. Maybe I'm hoping Middle East War # gazillion evaporates as US interest does. I'm hoping this conflict is dissimilar enough from Iraq to turn out differently, and for us to have learned something in the interceding 20+ years

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

to be fair time is much older than Iran. But it is weird they've taken 40 years to develop a nuclear weapon when designs have been freely available online for over half that time.

[–] hoch@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

The design isn't the issue, it's obtaining enough enriched material to actually construct it.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat

~ Donald Rumsfeld

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago

They have weapons and we have the receipts to prove it!

  • Rummy
[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)

call me crazy, but I think the US has WMDs, they are not responsible enough to have them

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Send in the Marines!

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Is there any country that doesn't have WMDs? Why is this even worth saying?

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 22 points 2 months ago

I mean.... Iraq didn't have them until we sold them the precursor chemicals to make them. What they were really upset about was that Saddam was supposed to use all those to kill Iranians and then the Kurds.

You do a guy a favour by helping him eliminate any of his dissonance and what do you get in return? The guy tries to invade Kuwait to pay off all the money he owes for invading Iran. When did empowering ruthless dictators to do your bidding get so complicated?

[–] criticon@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 months ago

Mexico (we don't know how)

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Probably some of the very smallest ones, like the Marshall Islands or something

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

That's what they want you to think

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Monaco maybe? Oh wait no—they have many billionaires

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Your family has two TVs? You must be rich.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"why don’t presidents fight the war, why do they always send the poor"

[–] whyalone@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, kings and presidents should go and hand fight their opponent and their people should watch them fight while eating popcorn and place bets, instead those low dick effort presidents and kings send innocent people to die for them, while them are hiding in their castles or bunkers. Fuck you

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 18 points 2 months ago

We also have WMD. WMD of course being an acronym for Weird, Megalomaniacal Dictator.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Every country who is anywhere close to a genocidal rogue state who explicitly stated they intend to do a Lebensraum and has attacked them unprovoked multiple times should have WMDs

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Which country are we talking about now?

[–] darvocet@infosec.pub 9 points 2 months ago

What do you mean you've seen this one? It's brand new.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, clearly it works for the people.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago

"people"

Are we sure?

[–] Disaster@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

And the coils grow ever tighter.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I got wracked in Iraq, so I ran to Iran

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Plot twist Trump pulled a Bush by mixing up their countries and Trump actually intended to invade Iraq this time but got it mixed up with Iran (so a reverse Bush? hsub?).

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Nice idea, but that would have required Trump to plan. Maybe he just said the wrong country since after every public speach his aids give him a concussion so he can start fresh next time.

[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Israel has WMDs