With this thread the Ayatollah shows his biases: he speaks up against an attack from the Zionist entity on his country's soil, but says nothing about the countless dead in the South African white genocide. This is shameful. Even though there is as of yet still a debate over whether or not one can consider the South African events as genocide, the silence from Khamenei is deafening.
news
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
oh yeah like Ayatollah is going to stand up for South Africa when there's a new Mario Kart on the Nintendo Switch 2.
I mean given the nature of the strike, I cannot imagine what they can do in response other than declare war formally, other than if maybe they can take out Israels upper cabinet in response? Missiles wont cut it this time.
My thinking is the reason we haven't yet seen a declaration of war is because they have to get the word out to all their proxies, and mobilize their forces. They won't declare war until they are ready to do their response. Declaring war officially and not following up with a massive counter attack would make them appear weak. It's about timing is my guess.
would make them appear weak
I'd say that has been the case for the last 20 months.
you arent wrong. But it would become much worse. I don't think they can afford to look any weaker than they do right now. If they don't end up declaring war i expect Iran to be a failed state within a year tbh. Since Israel won't stop, and it will show Iran can't defend itself.
From what I saw before any attacks happened, their plan was always to retaliate in kind, but also begin focus on developing nuclear weapons.
I would assume they are currently planning their retaliation and production of nuclear weapons, and will likely not want to escalate to full scale war until they get their nukes situated both of these will take time as the strike eliminated military chiefs and scientists so they need to restructure and reorganize.
But this is obviously just assumptions at this point.
Everything i have seen suggests it is already a full scale war on Israels part. It isn't really up to Iran to have it not be a war if Israel keeps bombing them and won't stop. Which they've indicated they'll continue to do. So Iran either fights back, and declares war, or it submits and lets all its nuclear sites be destroyed, and the regime probably collapses.
Yeah I made my comment before I saw that Israel was continuing attacks.
Iran definitely couldn't just sit around even if that would have been strategically sound.
Iran definitely made their force felt though, and their people rallied around them for it. At this point we just have to hope Israel doesn't go all "Samson" either in retaliation for these waves or inevitable future retaliation. I think Iran is stronger and it's people more united than Israel expected.
They can't really do proportional response without risking Israel nuking them.
This reality underlies all of Iran's actions regarding Israel.
Yeah, which means Iran cannot give up it's nuclear program at any cost.
Yup, generally speaking, only countries nukes are truly sovereign
And of course Israel struck residential areas again
Yemen-Iran-Hezbollah coordinated destruction of the Zionist entity 2025?
Im praying for a miracle
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
get they ass khamenei!!!!
How the hell were their top generals and Nuclear Scientists taken out so easily (reports that they were just sleeping in their domestic apartments)!? Why were they not hidden in secure underground bunkers? Everyone was saying Israel attack was imminent! Such stupid unpreparedness!