greg2
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
269 points (92.7% liked)
Memes
10805 readers
1129 users here now
Post memes here.
A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.
An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.
- Wait at least 2 months before reposting
- No explicitly political content (about political figures, political events, elections and so on), !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca can be better place for that
- Use NSFW marking accordingly
Laittakaa meemejä tänne.
- Odota ainakin 2 kuukautta ennen meemin postaamista uudelleen
- Ei selkeän poliittista sisältöä (poliitikoista, poliittisista tapahtumista, vaaleista jne) parempi paikka esim. !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca
- Merkitse K18-sisältö tarpeen mukaan
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Indefinite?
indefinite /ĭn-dĕf′ə-nĭt/ adjective
- Not definite, especially.
- Unclear; vague.
- Lacking precise limits. "an indefinite leave of absence."
I have a vague notion of a new color. Success!
I'm thinking take an artist with exquisite color sense, and dose them (consentually) with mushrooms/ acid; that should do the trick.
Infinity does not require to be all encompassing.
The set of natural numbers is infinite, yet it contains no negative numbers.
The set of whole numbers is infinite, yet it contains no fractional numbers, except arbitrary fractions like four halves.
The set of fractional numbers is infinite, yet it does not contain most real numbers...
load more comments
(2 replies)
Pick any two adjacent known colors. Find the wavelength midpoint between these colors. Determine if this is a known color. Repeat until you've found an unclassified color.
This isn't an imagination problem, its a math problem.
Everything is a math problem. It just needs to be written in the proper form.
They are not talking about the mathematical definition of color, but how the color is represented in the mental image you have in your head. Think about how a blue wavelength becomes a blue "pixel" in your head. It is possible to imagine other colors? If we could see ultraviolet, what color would it be? Is my blue the same as your blue or what my brain interprets as blue is different from what your brain does?
load more comments
(3 replies)
This doesn't really work because colors are a spectrum. You can split and merge existing colors like using a single word for blue and green (like Japanese) or distinguish between light and dark blue (like Italian) but "light blue" isn't a new color. It's part of the blue spectrum
Yeah tell that to Pantone LLC
but "light blue" isn't a new color. It's part of the blue spectrum
A spectrum isn't a color, its a range of wavelengths. "Light Blue" is a narrower range of wavelengths with higher brightness value than the "Dark Blue" end.
We define a unique "color" as a specific combination of hue, saturation, and brightness value. "Inventing" a new color is just a question of finding a combination of attributes that hasn't been produced before. Thanks to the midpoint theorum, you can do this right up to the point of Plank's constant.
I meant spectrum as in it's not a fixed value but, fine, I can call it range instead. Doesn't change my argument.
What do you mean "hasn't been produced before"? That comes with a huge burden of proof. People produce color gradients all the time. Pretty many colors in them.
And if you produce a shade of blue that by happenstance is either more or less saturated than anything else, what have you found there? It isn't a new color by any meaningful definition. It won't blow anyone's mind, it's just a shade of blue similar but not identical to other blue shades. It falls into the blue range. The observable light is devided into colors, each inhabiting a range. The exact way is different depending on language and other contexts but by no meaningful definition is a color just a single value.
Before you double down on your definition: the implication is that your definition doesn't make much sense and to demonstrate it from a different angle: how precise are you going to measure these? Let's say a common blue has the saturation of 63%, would 64% quality as a new color? What about 63.2%? Where do you draw the line? And if you have to draw lines anyway, why not choose a meaningful way as in defining "blue" as one color?
What do you mean “hasn’t been produced before”? That comes with a huge burden of proof.
Sure. But, again, that's not a question of creativity, just an exhaustive exercise of proving uniqueness.
It isn’t a new color by any meaningful definition.
Because color isn't an invented concept, it is a perceived wavelength value/range. Asking for a "new color" is like asking for a "new number".
Under your broader definition of color, we've already found the three or seven or I guess nine if you want to count black/white, existing colors. The only way to "invent" new colors is to expand the spectrum by which humans perceive light.
Understanding how light works and how one might accomplish this takes creativity. But if we're excluding ultraviolet or infrared because they're outside the natural visual spectrum, all we can creatively accomplish is proving we've exhausted the range of available colors.
Under your broader definition of color, we've already found the three or seven or I guess nine if you want to count black/white, existing colors
Which is the point of the meme and I agree with it
all we can creatively accomplish is proving we've exhausted the range of available colors.
There is a lot we can do creatively besides creating new colors from stretch. The meme is about how the human mind is creative but this one thing it can't do.
Besides, how is your method creative? You said yourself it's pure mathematics.
load more comments
(8 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
octarine
new
But yah, my favourite one as well
I know I heard about a group in Africa (IIRC) where they have a lot more words for greens, but they don't have a word for blue, or something like that. When given a test to identify the odd color out, when it's a very slight tint change of green they identify it quickly, but most westerners take a lot longer. When all of them are green, but then there's a blue one, they take a long time, but westerners see it instantly.
It's why IQ tests are fundamentally flawed. Just our launguage can shape our recognition of the world. Imagine how much the rest of our culture, education, and surroundings influence us. None of these make us better or smarter than anyone else, yet they'll all make us better or worse at different things. They're all valuable, and it's part of why diversity, equity, and inclusion are so important. These different points of view can bring so much value to us
It’s why IQ tests are fundamentally flawed.
Since you have failed to correctly define the words “highfalutin”, “dogsbody”, “apiary”, “valise”, “collet”, “haruspex”, “threnody”, or even “copse”, we regret to inform you that you are functionally illiterate and likely mentally disabled.
highfalutin
Person that farts a lot
dogsbody
Body of dog
apiary
BEES
valise
That stuff that reduces friction
collet
Piece of meat
haruspex
Protagonist no. 2 of Pathologic, and protagonist of Pathologic 2
threnody
Made up word
copse
Corpse without r
😎
I didn't know Pathologic took place in the world of Harry Potter.
The same is true for English too.
Brown and orange are different brightness levels of the same colour. Brown is dark orange and orange is light brown. Yet people experience brown and orange as separate colours, because we have separate words for it, while we experience light blue and dark blue as different brightness levels of the same colour, because both are called "blue".
But we did recently invent a new color, or at least a new way to perceive color.
This one’s for me! I saw a new color the second time I broke through on DMT! I can still see it in my imagination. I’ve broken through since and haven’t seen it again.
I had the hood of a car come down on the back of my head when I was taking out an alternator.
I saw all kinds of new colors!
You could have done something more productive, like coming up with the Flux capacitor....
Trying to imagine objects in higher than 3 spatial dimensions.
Imagining 2 or more temporal dimensions.
Designing a system of governance that is fair to all constituents, physically realizable, and marketable enough to convince future constituents to follow it.
Imagining 2 or more temporal dimensions
This one's actually kind of easy. The plot of Back to the Future (and every other time travel story where changing the past is possible) doesn't work unless there's more than one timelike dimension.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The visual spectrum is finite. So it's an impossible task.
There's actually impossible colors that can be seen by playing with the visual spectrum of the color sensitive molecules. You can also play with visual processing to further see impossible colors
I'm not saying there's infinite combinations, but there's ones you've never seen and no one has a word for
load more comments
(6 replies)
Epic Its like a purple, blue, pink, but more vibrant with sparkles. Similar to what is used for epic level items in games, hence the name.
For this to be a color, it needs to be even at all points, so no sparkles!
No, no, they have a point - if they can imagine something that's perfectly uniform and sparkly, then that'd actually be something novel
Fair enough!
Also a cool thing about imaginination, is you don't have to stick to or define all the parameters to imagine it. You can go like, I'm imagining in this imaginary senario I've figured that part out, and just run with it.
True, but when we say we can't imagine something, we don't mean a mental construct that we don't think through, we mean something tangible. In case of color, it means actually visualizing it mentally, not imagining there could be something.
That sounds self imposed.
Nah, just two different meanings of "imagine".
One is to imagine a color
And the other to imagine there is a color.
Not really seing how those are different forms of imagination. And also, still imagining the color, just ignoring the limitations or letting them fill themselves in.
I can picture a solid color that sparkles evenly, or even that has just one shimmer evenly across the whole surface, however the initial premise was just the limits of imagination, and you don't need to self-impose a bunch of parameters onto it like you're engineering something in real life. You don't need to imagine it 100% accurate to the point where you could reconstruct it, even partially imagining something is still imagining it, and you can even expand on it over time.
In the first case, you can visualize it, at least mentally, like, actually see it.
In the second, you just imagine it could be a thing.
For me at least, these are two wildly different concepts.
Trying to think of a new colour after turning off my mental safeguards felt like I was a computer dividing by zero. Honestly, would not recommend.
Red but a bit greener
We would have also accepted a bluer yellow.
view more: next ›