"Is it OK to Earn Rental Income from Auschwitz?"
Ethicist:
Obviously, be a good leech and don't forget to do absolutely nothing. We can't control the fact that the Nazi Party is doing a genocide, sweaty. 
this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
53 points (98.2% liked)
Slop.
677 readers
427 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
Democrats are only good for making right-wingers look lame and any left-wing vanguard party should constantly point to democrats to show any impressionable youth spouting chanslop “no, right-wingers are NOT cool. Look at democrats.”
Trick question. Rental income isn't earned.
Brings me back to a struggle session I had with an engineering student who argued that working for Raytheon is fine as long as you donate some of your income to relief agencies who help survivors of the attacks carried out with Raytheon weapons.
I literally left an org because I was getting pressure to work on weapons.
Engineering ethics in the US are a joke. It's ingrained in the culture.
He's like a character in a bad war comedy. Yikes.
Reminds me of an email that got sent by the computer science department back when I was doing a degree.
this is the same tradition of ethics that came up with an entire kingdom's worth of castles of thought to justify slavery
'kind of' evil.
New York Crimes can't get itself to see imprisoned people as fully human.
The bonus question is about half naked people on beaches this is a great snapshot into seppo media.
Most people accept that states have a right to control their borders and that there’s a legitimate role for authorities charged with enforcing immigration policy, especially when it comes to those who have committed serious crimes. ICE also investigates trafficking, smuggling and other transnational offenses that clearly require federal oversight.
“We can just put human rights to a poll” ass answer.
Whoever wrote this Would have said slavery was fine in the 1850s.
Whoever wrote this Would have said slavery was fine in the 1850s.
A few hours ago I typed out a reply at Bluesky but I ended up deleting it. I realized in context it could be seen as a silly and sort of pathetic effort to grab likes and not as in-passing shitpost. Bluesky takes itself so very seriously and everybody is like-grabbing all the time.
I'll share it here.
---
If the New York Times Ethicist was born in 1754 and not 1954...
Me: "Is it okay for me to own slaves?"
Ethicist: "Yes, provided it's legal in your area."
Liberals working so hard to forget that ICE was created by the second Bush regime in 2003