621
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sheeple@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago

Least gerrymandered election

[-] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Whoever made this underestimates the shore of a Great Lake, I see. Ohio and Michigan already have beaches.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago
[-] Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social 35 points 1 year ago

Look man, I'll get sick if i drink from Lake Erie same as if i drank from the ocean. Works for me

[-] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

In some parts of Michigan you don't even have to drink out of the lake. You can just drink out of your sink and get sick

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

No salt and no sharks, and all the beachy goodness.

[-] Blastasaurus@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

As someone who grew up on the Great Lakes who now lives on the Pacific, they are not comparable.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Infynis@midwest.social 15 points 1 year ago

Minnesota and Wisconsin too. And with the Eerie canal, they all have access to the ocean

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If we're just gonna start counting whether or not our waterways have access to the ocean, then pretty much every Midwestern state counts by way of the Mississippi's drainage basin. 32 states have tributary rivers that find their way to the Mississippi, and then to the Gulf.

Incidentally, I love the detail in this map where the state of Mississippi no longer touches the Mississippi River, and the city of New Orleans is apparently divided across the states of Iowa, Missouri, Illinois, and Arkansas.

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago

After this map, Ohio no longer has a Great Lake Beach.
They’ll just be left with a salty proboscis through Mary’s West Virginia.

[-] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago

Michigan is stealing our BEACHES??!

TO WAR, I SAY! ⚔️

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] legion02@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

And no shot Chicago is moving into Wisconsin without a civil war first.

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, Chicago here. Fuck the ocean, give me back my lakeshore.

Edit: actually, if I'm still physically in Chicago, I guess it doesn't matter overly much whether it's Chicago, IL or Chicago, WI, though I think Illinois needs us more, from a political perspective.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The image says nothing about beaches, it's just the title of the post.

[-] Blackout@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah we don't need it, keep your east coast beaches.

[-] BigPapaE@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

I'm fine with this as long as the little strip is referred to as the state's tentacle

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The "proboscis like appendage"

[-] BigPapaE@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Sounds like prime real estate

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago

You can now drive through Minnesota for an entire day and not leave.

[-] Fermion@mander.xyz 12 points 1 year ago

Grand Portage, MN to Brookings, OR is 35 hrs on the fastest route and 37hrs on the route closest to the map.

That would be three long days of driving for someone not cannonballing it.

[-] lemmyman@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Feels weird that MN doesn't follow the Mississippi to the gulf. But it's probably better this way

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pikasaurX4@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

Great, now everyone has more beach than poor NH

[-] Jentu@lemmy.film 18 points 1 year ago

Washington state is like helpppppp

[-] thejbw@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

Split Seattle like that and you would turn those four other states blue, lol.

[-] ares35@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

at the expense of flipping washington itself, though. lots of nutjobs in the portion that remains.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fireweed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Not sure the folks in Bellingham are going to be too keen on joining North Dakota. Lynden might be cool with it though. Idaho claiming Spokane would be a hilarious (and tragic) turnabout. Would Okanogan even notice becoming part of Montana? The state capitol stays at least, but losing the Seattle metro region would be a major blow to the economy. Looks like Vancouver is now Washington's largest city... And it's just a subset of another state's metro region!

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

United States

*offer not valid in Hawaii and Alaska.

[-] conc@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

No no I want to see Hawaii landlocked now.

California gets stretched to surround both of them.

"What, you went to Hawaii for vacation? That flyover state?"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Jentu@lemmy.film 11 points 1 year ago

Oklahoma is now very jealous of North Dakota having a longer “finger”

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Minnesota's tail > both

[-] spacemanspiffy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Long Island is gone.

Not complaining though.

Every other state had to borrow its long.

[-] VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The IT wire management guys would have neatly routed the western states into a single oceanic backhaul access corridor.

[-] DanglingFury@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Lol. Ohio trades 300 miles of shoreline and multiple islands along lake erie (to michigan of all people) so it can drive way the hell over to a crowded jersey beach. No thank you.

[-] Taringano@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Excuse me, Crowded Ohio beach.

[-] Kase@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

What about Alaska and Hawaii, don't they get to touch the ocean? /s

[-] macaroni1556@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Ah yes the United States of Bosnia

[-] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

I think Minnesota has the longest drive to it's beach. Anyone see a longer drive?

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 7 points 1 year ago

This would be pretty cool. But would it have unintended negative consequences?

[-] KnowledgeableNip@leminal.space 24 points 1 year ago

Nah pretty sure this will end well

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 15 points 1 year ago

Shit, my dumbass thought those were canals bringing the ocean to the states, and I only now see it's the states being stretched to the oceans lol

[-] Aquila@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Right there with ya bud 😂

[-] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[-] troybot@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

Michigan already has really nice beaches. Why the hell do they get to take Toledo and Cleveland?.. oh wait I'll get legal weed now so this is fine actually.

[-] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

This is somewhat stressful to look at

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
621 points (95.3% liked)

Funny

6773 readers
1008 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS