this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
477 points (98.0% liked)

linuxmemes

25063 readers
1718 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] statler_waldorf@sopuli.xyz 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    FCKGW-RHQQ2-YXRKT-8TG6W-2B7Q8

    [–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago

    What the fuck :O

    That's my CD-Key! Aaaaaa

    [–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    This is burned into my brain like nothing else.

    [–] BlindFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    What's this a reference to?

    [–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

    Back in the day we all had a pirated copy of windows xp pro (corporate, if I’m remembering correctly).

    This was the cd key we all used.

    [–] SteveTech@programming.dev 78 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    You can always install activate-linux, and it even works on Windows.

    [–] pezhore@infosec.pub 15 points 2 days ago

    That's a delight. I should add that to our Linux jumpbox templates just to spice things up with the junior engineers

    [–] Lucien@mander.xyz 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    I'm pretty sure that both Red Hat Enterprise and SUSE Enterprise require a license key.

    [–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)
    [–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

    RHEL never did to install it. To get any updates though, you have to provide a contract number.

    Edit: 10 might be different, but I don't think it would be.

    [–] xylogx@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

    That’s right, you pay for support not the binaries and the source code is free under GPL.

    [–] Lucien@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    Not certain, I haven't installed red hat in several years.

    [–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    I started Linux with a physical copy of redhat 5.2 in 2000.

    I had an old friend who busted his ass to educate me on computers when I was a kid and I will be forever thankful to him.

    [–] Lucien@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    For me, my first exposure to Linux was around that same time, but with SuSE. It's still my go-to distro, even though I've installed and used dozens of different ones. Compiling Gentoo over a weekend is a fun experience at least once.

    [–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    I think I used gentoo years ago. Is that the one that builds and downloads as you install? I’m getting old, it’s been years and I remember a distro that was making headlines with something like that years ago.

    My go-to distro for a long time was Mandrake, which became Mandriva. I have no idea what’s going on with that one now.

    I’ve been using SteamOS and EndeavourOS recently.

    [–] Lucien@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

    Yeah, Gentoo builds everything from source. Supposed to make it faster, but I didn't notice enough of a difference to make it worth my while.

    [–] sxan@midwest.social 55 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (16 children)

    I thought not, but just last week there was a discussion about someone asking about buying the "Pro" version of their distro, which have them access to... free open source software they could have just downloaded. Had a big (polite) argument with someone about the ethics of this

    Distros (ZorinOS) are doing this crap. Shysters will always find a way to fleece people.

    [–] felsiq@lemmy.zip 94 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    I personally don’t mind at all if open source projects want to sell a β€œpro” version for businesses, as long as it’s still open source. Selling priority troubleshooting and dev attention to issues to businesses seems like one of the less offensive ways to fund open source projects in a capitalist society, imo

    [–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    I also don't mind if they are "selling" nothing, or just a supporter icon. As long as they are transparent that that is all you are getting.

    [–] stabryen@piefed.social 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    That's pretty much it, right? ZorinOS Pro gives you some more desktop layouts, more wallpapers, and what they call "Zorin Installation Support service". Basically like buying a hat in a free game.

    But the "Advanced productivity tools" one is a bit misleading, apparently it's stuff anyone can install from the store it just pre-installs some unnamed apps for you.

    I don't mind selling some cosmetic stuff to fund development, the app thing is a bit shady though.

    [–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 10 points 2 days ago

    Agree. I wouldn't even mind it if they were more open about what they're actually doing, as picking a well working set of apps from the sea open-source apps can have value.

    That said, if you read through that site it feels like they want to appear like it's them who created all that software.

    [–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

    Or for server software it can be funded with support contracts.

    [–] epicstove@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

    Isn't this basically how Fedora and RHEL are? RHEL is paid for giving you support, updates, etc. While Fedora is FOSS. You just install it and they don't care what you do with it.

    [–] sxan@midwest.social 4 points 2 days ago

    Yes! I completely agree. The distinction is, to me, utterly important: they aren't selling the software, they're selling the service. Hell, if they want to sell the option to get your bugs fixed on demand, great! That's enormously different than taking millions of developer hours spent creating OSS, sticking a label and name on it, and then reselling it as if you made any real contribution to the OSS community.

    [–] kungen@feddit.nu 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    I mean, that's kinda like RHEL if you pay for the "self-service" subscription?

    [–] sxan@midwest.social 5 points 2 days ago

    Yes, and I have the same opinion about Redhat.

    No issue with their actual paid service levels; it costs them to run those, and they're providing value. Most corporations won't use software unless they have a telephone number to call when it breaks, and service level guarantees. That's worth paying for; it's a service. But the fact that they're charging for software that includes some that I wrote, and which RHEL got for free, and for which I receive no kickbacks, is inexcusable.

    [–] spuninh@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago

    But even Red Hat offers that subscription for free for up to 16 machines

    load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 days ago

    Unfortunately, whats scarier to people is if the installer is text or TUI, :0

    [–] Gork@lemm.ee 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Wait I'm the system administrator, who the hell do I contact??!!

    [–] Truscape@lemm.ee 18 points 2 days ago

    User not in super-sudoers file. This incident will be reported.

    [–] db2@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

    The Ultra Sysadmin. Bring the sacrifice.

    [–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    There's a typo there so I think it's fake.

    There are also 26 X's in the boxes.

    [–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] Geodad@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

    Apparently, you've never run Xandros.

    [–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

    I agree. It's quite unlikely the setup will finish in 33 minutes. Not really, anyway.

    [–] double_quack@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago
    load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί