this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
62 points (81.0% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1721 readers
636 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Libs only vote and think that's enough! You're required to murder people to join the club!"

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 19 points 3 days ago (14 children)

Yeah remember when we all banded together and peacefully voted hitler and mussolini out?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Well, is it enough? Voting is good, but is it enough to defeat fascism? It wasn't enough in the USA. It would be wonderful if voting was enough everywhere, but fascists don't just accept the results of an election and give up their dreams of ruling over you.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It wasn't enough in the USA.

Perhaps ironically, because people didn't vote. Anti-electoralists/accelerationists oppose reform and incremental change.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yes it is ironic. But even if ppl voted and we got the democrats. There’s still lots to do. The dems are still neoliberals who prioritise the wealth of the few over the lives of the many. They are just a little more moderated than the republicans at that.

So if you vote Dem and think “I’ve done all I can” you’re also part of the problem. Lasting serious change requires radical collective action. Voting isn’t enough. It’s just a tiny thing you should do aswell. The bulk of the effort stands outside it.

Voting is not how we get liberation. It’s how we occasionally slow down the machine that crushes people.

(Obligatory Fuck Hexbear for their support of Imperialist and Genocidal Regimes)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Voter turnout has been relatively high in the past few elections. You could argue that the baseline was extremely low, and I agree with you that there is a concerted effort to suppress and discourage voting. But voting is not enough, because our system has been structured and modified to limit our options.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The vast majority of people who don't vote are not anti-electorialist, they are just apathetic/lazy

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago

Correct. But The anti-electoralists are louder than the apathetic and discourage breaking out of that apathy.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (9 children)

I think it is more of a failure of the democrats. Harris simply did not get enough traction compared to Trump. The Democrat party was simply complacent and underestimated the power of the Republican party. They kind of just assumed everyone was going to vote Democratic when in really Trump worked very hard to swing the swing voters. Winning a US election is hard and you can't just it on your butt and assume people will vote for you. Harris came into the game way to late and didn't have much of a plan. She could've made something up like Trump does but instead she associated herself with unfixed issues.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"you can't vote fascists out of office

votes Fascists out of office

"Well uh still not good enough!"

[–] daepicgamerbro69@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

He is making good relations with Russia. That's probably why

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Crazy that the original post said nothing about what antifascists do or don't do but people insist on projecting.

"Fascists aren't gaining power. Antifascists are making a comeback"

The first sentence is necessary (but not sufficient) for beating fascism; the second is a statement of momentum.

Antifascism has existed as long as fascism, well before any guns were fired or wars were fought. It encompasses many different approaches to opposing fascism and isn't even strictly a left-wing position (revolutionary vs counter revolutionary).

If you think the only viable playbook to beat fascism is revolutionary accelerationism, that's a logical stance to take. But it makes no sense to be upset when other people use the term differently.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Did they vote out fascism or just successfully not vote in the explicitly far right? Though I mean hell, Germany's AfD just had its best showing didn't it?

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The AfD did do really well last election, but it was also just classified as a right-wing extremist organization by Germany's equivalent of the FBI. That means more monitoring and possibly reduction or removal of public funding. That should hopefully be an obstacle for them in the future.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

And might be dismantled as a neo-Nazi organization.

As with South Korea, you can see these mechanisms functioning, whether or not the end result... works.

[–] amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

reminder that the first antifascists who happened to vote were organized in paramilitaries so they could fight Nazis in the streets. unless libs start doing that, I don't wanna hear about "le cordon sanitaire".

judging by how modern libs are all rabid Zionists, maybe no paramilitaries for them though 🤧

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›