this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
269 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

69657 readers
2742 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 77 points 5 days ago (4 children)

That will be helpful, but for ducks sake. . .

Can we please get some sanity in the white house?

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 59 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The country literally voted for insanity and derangement rather than the status quo. Like, I don't even know what to do.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I bet we find out they cheated by fucking with voting machines in swing states someday. They sure do like to make little quips about it that they think only MAGA will understand.

[–] hasnep@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This kind of election interference speculation erodes trust in democracy and is part of what led to the January 6th thing. Not saying that's what you're trying to do, just that it's a precursor to that kind of stuff.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This isn't speculation, speculation is when you have no evidence, there was evidence several elections already just nobody refuses to investigation, only the cons ever speculated

[–] hasnep@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

That's literally the rhetoric that the Republican party used about the 2020 election that ended with the January 6th riot. Do you honestly think that if there was evidence of voting interference that the democrats wouldn't go to court over it? Or even share the evidence?

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 3 points 5 days ago

Aside from nebulous groups who made up some bad statistics, likely to grift some donations, i didn't see any claims towards that.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

People love their bigotry, that's why trump was voted in, helped with election interference

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 32 points 5 days ago (4 children)

On 3 November 2026 there will be an opportunity to end the republican majority in the senate, ending their ability to pass any bill they please

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There is also about 450 days of protesting, striking, organizing, boycotting...

Waiting for the next election is not going to fix things, just like it didnt before.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Lmao you saw what they got done in a hundred days, you really think there will be enough rule of law for voting to matter in 2026 if we don't do something sooner?

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 2 points 5 days ago

Not for me. I hope those given the opportunity will take it.

[–] Rumbelows@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Will there, though? A group of people who actively ignore court orders and the constitution (when it suits them) are really, really unlikely to relinquish power.

[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

With the current crop of oval office occupants...???

Most assuredly not.

Don't be silly. 🤷‍♂️

[–] aramova@infosec.pub 36 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Or, and hear me out...

Fucking make the red cunt's lives miserable until they force the Mango Mussolini to live at the golf course and fuck off once and for all.

Plan B, they ship the product and make DHL, FedEx, USPS who ever collect so it's fully clear to everyone who's paying and where.

Adding fees and abstraction just confuse the idiots who will try to say it's China who needs to pay for it

[–] db2@lemmy.world 33 points 5 days ago

You could provide literal receipts and they'll still say things contrary to reality. They're deeply stupid people.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yes, because Trump is eliminating the de minimus exception for Tariffs. Meaning even if an individual imports a small product it will be subject to tariffs.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I had a look into the Temu and Aliexpress subreddits: Funeral mood.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 days ago

Plan C: Thats what the 2. Amendment in the US Constitution is for!

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago

A project I am supporting just dropped a mail on that subject. They will handle all non-US deliveries including Canada and Mexico through other countries. Originally, they wanted to handle everything from the US. Good for us, as we expect to have a relay in the EU so we don't even have to deal with customs.

[–] Threaded@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago