this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
275 points (99.6% liked)

politics

23129 readers
3531 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Department of Transport is panicking after experiencing a much higher amount of voluntary resignations than expected.

The Department of Transport is scrambling to retain its staff after thousands volunteered to resign.

About 4,700 people applied for a second resignation offer, amounting to around 9% of the agency’s total workforce.

The vast majority of offers are said to come from employees at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

Employees facing resignation have been forced to attend a series of "career transition" workshops, described as “insulting.”

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Turturtley@aussie.zone 23 points 16 hours ago

“I’ll come back when Trump is in jail, and the GOP are not in office”

[–] Sibshops@lemm.ee 70 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

I don't understand how Trump is firing so many people and still spending a lot more money than previous presidents?

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 62 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Employee salaries make up like 5% of the federal budget

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 25 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

To answer the question you wrote:

I don't understand how Trump is firing so many people and still spending a lot more money than previous presidents[; explain] ?

It costs money to move or get or toss people. Doge is spending a LOT on this 'churn' cost with no idea whom it should fire and why it shouldn't fire so many. Because they're kids led by an idiot, and not much comprehension in the group.

So they pay severance and kick the people out with no transition. And planes fall out of the sky. And when they realize they fucked up, or the courts tell them how they fucked up, they need to beg people to come back. I think they do not get their severance money back.

Dotcoms trying to run a gov is just tragic comedy.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

It would be prohibitively expensive to bring me back. I'd be paying taxes in the top bracket and my signing bonus would be 7 figures.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 46 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Because he picked a single apple off the highest part of the tree, instead of the low hanging fruit that the DoD/Pentagon currently has on full display.

Climbed right past them, all the way to the top, to pick the smallest fucking apple that hurts the most people.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 26 points 20 hours ago

Hurting people was always the point.

[–] ModestCrab@lemmy.wtf 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn’t help that dod pentagon is so big because the USD is so strong. Kinda bad for national defense if the dollar loses value.

Doesn’t help that dod pentagon is so big because the USD is so strong. Kinda bad for national defense if the dollar loses value.

Looks at the USD forex over the last month. Umm, I think I have some bad news...

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 22 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Increases in defense spending and increases in tax cuts for the rich (which isn't really spending more, but reduces government revenue which thereby increases budget deficits.

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 31 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It wasn't about cutting spending, DOGE has three objectives:

  • seize control over our institutions
  • collect data that could be used to blackmail people
  • cut pesky investigations that were bothering elon
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm gonna need to see the math on that second point.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 10 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

They are currently trying to blackmail immigrants to self-deport. And apparently some citizens. They are also sanctioning employers of prominent public figures they don't like (at least one law firm). They are blackmailing universities who don't help oppress protestors. It's a matter of perspective, but they are 100% using that data to threaten others to silence critics.

You could argue it on a technicality if you don't like that definition of blackmail but it's an apt enough word for colloquial use.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 4 points 19 hours ago

You forgot increases in travel expenses so that he can line his heavily inflated golf club coffers with lovely taxpayer lucre.

[–] MrEff@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Increases in other contracts that funnel tax money into oligarc pockets but provide no value to tax payers, decrease in revenue collected to offset expenses due to IRS cuts and tax code changes, and the other big one is from judicial fund settlements that have already surpassed pre trump levels.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 58 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Trump’s a s*** show

FTFY

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago

Career Transition workshops after you resign... Lol capitalist are some of the dumbest people. You don't want people that already resigned to actually leave, but don't improve working condition and pay. Just a few meetings about how shitty the job market is and how leaving would turn your old job into hell on earth. My two we resignation would quickly become two weeks of doing fuck all but work.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 17 points 18 hours ago

Lol eat shit loser. Should have thought of that before you got in bed with a fascist.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago

One example given by the employee included an announcement by Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy that workers needed to obey a dress code.

"why are people leaving?!" /s

[–] TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee 3 points 14 hours ago

DOGE Strikes Again!

[–] doug@lemmy.today 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I’d have a hard time returning/might stay away out of spite/principal.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

I’d return for a significantly higher salary, then spend most of my time leveraging that for even more in the private sector.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago

Employees facing resignation have been forced to attend a series of "career transition" workshops, described as “insulting.”

I would immediately look into how the contract was awarded for those workshops. I'll bet Elon gave them to a friend in a no-bid fashion, at a grossly inflated price. Efficiency!

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 7 points 19 hours ago

The vast majority of offers are said to come from employees at the Federal Aviation Administration. [...] A department spokesperson told Politico [...] that employees who perform critical safety work are exempt. “Our teams are layered with redundancies to ensure efficiency initiatives will not compromise safety,”

Really? Cause that's really not the image they've been projecting.

"It feels like it’s intended to tell us we’re being dramatic or that we’re not professional enough to go through turmoil and remain detached and completely calm. It feels out of touch,” an anonymous employee said

Ri-ight. Because when I think of hysterical federal employees, the first group that comes to my mind is the FAA....

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 19 hours ago

Department of Transportation?