this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
534 points (99.3% liked)

News

37418 readers
1464 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Experts say Pentagon chief has endangered secrets of US defense department and given assistance to foreign spies

As more develops about the US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, and his repeated disclosures of sensitive military intelligence in unsecured Signal group chats, there are growing concerns his behavior has weakened the Pentagon in the eyes of its foreign adversaries and made him and his entourage a top espionage target.

Allies, already concerned by Donald Trump’s aggressive tariffs, have also begun to see the US as an intelligence-sharing liability. There are fears that the mounting firings and leak inquiries in Hegseth’s orbit, along with his inability to manage these internal crises, exposes the entire global US war footing – especially, if a geopolitical and external crisis comes across his desk.

“[What if] a foreign entity, whether it be a state actor or non-state actor, is able to intercept the movements of troops or department personnel, or something like that, capture them and hold them to ransom,” said Kristofer Goldsmith, an Iraq war veteran and CEO at Task Force Butler. “That kind of thing could very easily happen.”

(page 2) 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gowron_Howard@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I assumed it’s all part of the plan. He’s not going to face any consequences and the info is available to whoever wants it.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Target, he's the eye of the bull.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 0 points 1 year ago

“[What if] a foreign entity, whether it be a state actor or non-state actor, is able to intercept the movements of troops or department personnel, or something like that, capture them and hold them to ransom,”

That'd be very swell, why do you ask?

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

unsecured Signal group chats

As inappropriate, stupid and reckless as whisky Pete has been it's not like he was using Facebook PMs or Twitter. Signal is quite secure in general.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Signal encryption is already targeted by Russians and Belarusians trying to compromise it. If it's still secure, who knows for how long. Also, is Hegseth's phone itself secure, and everyone has communicating with? Probably not. That is why these kinds of communications are not meant to take place over 3rd party software and on unsecured phones.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Signal encryption is already targeted by Russians and Belarusians trying to compromise it

So what? So is the NSA and everyone else in the world? You have no evidence that the could or have compromised it at all. Just baseless "oh but it may be compromised some day!".

Put another way - Russians and Belorussians are also trying to hack the encryption used by your bank. WHO KNOWS HOW LONG THAT WILL REMAIN SAFE.

Also, is Hegseth’s phone itself secure, and everyone has communicating with?

This is the actual issue here - not Signal. Using a personal device with who-knows-what for hardening or even patch management is a significant problem.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You have no evidence that the could or have compromised it at all. Just baseless "oh but it may be compromised some day!".

Yes, that is the point. I have no evidence, nor will I. When Russia hacks it successfully, they aren't going to put out a press release and give everyone a grace period to move off the app before they start harvesting state secrets are they? You need to act like it is already compromised becuase you don't know that it isn't or when it inevitably will be.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, that is the point. I have no evidence, nor will I.

🤦

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is no such thing as unbreakable encryption. It will be compromised at some point and you will not know when. To pretend otherwise is to asinine.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›