AskUSA
About
Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:
- !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
- !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here
Rules
- Be nice or gtfo
- Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
- Follow the rules of discuss.online
Sister communities
Related communities
- !asklemmy@lemmy.world
- !asklemmy@sh.itjust.works
- !nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
- !showerthoughts@lemmy.world
- !usa@ponder.cat
Yes
I believe some TIC agreements are structured as HOAs, which is perfectly reasonable
but I'm pretty sure that's not what you're referring to here.
Yes.
I’ve lived with good HOAs. I’d still rather they dissolve and everything be part of normal city operations.
Plus is it just me or are the same people that say they want small government also the ones who are super pro HOA?
Yes. Housing is tough enough as it is. Linking a lot of properties to the HOA is disgusting and should be illegal.
Objectively yes. We don't need an extra government to cover the job of the actual government, especially not ones that are easy for psychopaths to infiltrate. Your park? That's the damn state's responsibility, pay your fair share of taxes instead and let the city handle it. Your home value? Don't treat housing as a damn vehicle for investment. All those nasty poors and minorities? If they bother you find a way to leave earth, permanently.
HOAs are emblematic of everything wrong with America and actively strip away the good parts.
Should HOAs be banned?
That's an easy one:
YES!!!
I mean I highly dislike them but also feel like many people like them for the exact reasons I dislike them.
I think a small community being able to have say in who moves in, asking contract term violators to leave in exceptional cases, while still being liable for discriminatory actions, can be a good thing. However, being able to fine members and repossess their property? That should be 100,000,000% illegal.
Absolutely.
Waiting for the inevitable showdown over having hens in your backyard. Instant solution to the egg problem.
for regular ass house on a regular ass street, yes. exceptions are made for condominiums, apartment complexes and gated communities.
I don't want to live in a neighborhood where you can leave a car to rot on the front lawn, where you can have cows shitting all over, or you can build a 20 foot tall Jesus statue in your front yard.
If your HOA sucks, then get involved and make it better. Mine is fine.
city odanances usually can prevent the first two, however requre elected leaders or direct voting to let it happen reducing the chance that a cowless minority could ban them.
if you cant even decide what color your house is, you dont own it.
youre LARPing as a home owner while a Kouncil of Karens could evict you from the house you supposedly own.
Yes.
Yes
Banned? The freedom cities will be the best HOAs ever.