440
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 223 points 1 year ago

“Let’s nominate someone indicted for fraud. That doesn’t make me look suspicious at all.”

[-] TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

TL;DR: I think it's a play to help Trump (if that's even possible) at taxpayer expense.

Another way to look at it, is that she and the Freedom Caucus are trying to make it impossible to fill the speaker position. Last time took 15 tries over 4 days. We have a pro-tempore speaker, but legislation will take a back seat to filling the Gavelmeister (I mean speaker).

This data is from Sept. 20 https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/20/politics/mccarthy-house-speaker-vote-margin-numbers-dg/index.html

  • 31 far-right Republicans who have repeatedly voted against McCarthy

  • 18 moderate Republicans in districts Biden won in 2020

  • 172 other Republicans

  • 212 Democrats

  • 2 vacancies

That's 435 seats (2 vacant). From 2001 to 2021, the Senate spent an average of 164 days in session each year, and the House spent an average of 149 days in session (source https://ballotpedia.org/117th_Congress_legislative_calendar). The annual salary of a rank-and-file Member of Congress is $174,000 (source: https://www.congressionalinstitute.org/2019/02/21/how-much-do-members-of-congress-get-paid-2/)

So each day of this clusterbuck, each member of congress is getting just over $1,167. Multiply that by 433 (the number of filled seats in Congress) and we spend $505,651 or half-a-million dollars each day for congress to twiddle their thumbs. It cost the US taxpayer more than 2 million dollars to elect McCarthy, and now we're going to pay to find a replacement.

While the republicans have the majority, it is fractured by extremists and moderates. The democrats won't vote for an extremist republican, so most likely 212 (Dem) + 18 moderates = 230 Nay, even if 172 others + 31 extremists say yea, the vote fails. But if the 31 extremists say nay to a moderate, it's going to take democrats reaching across the aisle, and then Gaetz plays the ouster card again.

We have a continuation resolution to keep the Government going for 45 days, or until Nov. 14. If The Freedom Caucus keeps the speaker position churning, the government may shut down because they are too busy playing "who gets the gavel?". The far right is pushing to cut funding for the F.B.I. and the Justice Department (source https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/04/us/politics/trump-house-budget-fbi-republicans.html) because this could help save Trump. But even if they got what they wanted now, I don't see New York stopping their trial, and I don't see Georgia just rolling over. Trump's bacon is being held to the fire. All the Freedom Caucus is doing is creating Chaos. I could hope their supporters would see this as an expensive Hail Mary, but I doubt it; they will probably get re-elected and this circus will continue.

[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

Moderate Republicans can obviously completely avoid Gaetz's and Greene's bullshit if they commit to consistently working across the aisle.

The House GOP saying that working with Democrats is career ending is what gives the Freedom Caucus its power to hold the GOP hostage.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago

The GOP is just fucking crazy and a danger to this country.

[-] DoctorTYVM@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

And they still get ~45% of the vote.

The States need a lot of fixes.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

MTG is exactly who her constituents want her to be.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Jerkules_Jerkules@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago

So their two best candidates are a, multiple court case proven conman, and the man who protected a high profile pedophile for years? The US is doing really well at the moment.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 87 points 1 year ago

Trump can't be Speaker for five reasons:

  1. Endangered Republicans from Biden districts won't vote for him, or they're doomed

  2. He has no understanding of House rules or procedures

  3. He's going to be spending most days in court, losing his businesses and facing felony jail time.

  4. Being speaker involves forming coalitions with other people

  5. Too much work

[-] FatLegTed@feddit.uk 19 points 1 year ago
  1. Not enough days off to play golf.
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am eager to see how all of this plays out.

We effectively have three parties now. There's the Democrats, the Republicans, and the MAGA extremists. The problem is that the MAGA extremists are simultaneously a much smaller group than either of the two major parties while also being juuuuuust large enough to make sure that neither one of the other two parties actually have a controlling majority.

Somewhat ironically, our system actually was designed to handle this. The entire system was designed so everybody involved would negotiate, compromise, and elect one speaker that everybody can at least agree with. Theoretically, we should be able to handle this without issue. The problem is that our system was barely able to handle a two-party system where both sides dig in their heels, double down, and view any concession at all as a "loss" rather than compromise and negotiate, because at least one side could use its majority to push something through one way or another.

But now we effectively have a three party system. Our system was not designed to handle a situation where three parties refuse to negotiate or compromise over virtually anything, but none have enough of a majority to push anything through. Especially when one of the three sides has openly stated their intent to just watch the whole thing burn.

One of three things is going to have to happen.

  1. The MAGA wing eventually backs down. IMO, doing this would effectively kill whatever influence they have even in their own party as backing down would make this entire ordeal a bigger waste of time than it already is. This would probably lead to the return of Kevin McCarthy as speaker with MTG's hand crammed right up his ass, but only this time even more emboldened as he would no longer have to worry about the deals he made to get the speaker's gavel in the first place.

  2. Moderate Republicans are going to have to work with Democrats to get Democrat support for a moderate Republican speaker. However, doing so is guaranteed to come with a whole new list of heavy concessions that would be all but politically suicidal for a Republican to accept. This would also make it nigh-impossible to govern as the Speaker would have the impossible task of balancing the wants of his own party with whatever deal he'd be forced to make with Democrats in order to get the position. (This idea would also be untenable to Democrats, as they'd have no power to enforce whatever agreement they would make once the new speaker is installed, and there would be nothing stopping a new speaker from just telling Democrats where they can shove their agreement.)

  3. Moderate Republicans double-down on their refusal to work with Democrats and instead begrudgingly accept a MAGA-endorsed candidate on MAGA terms just so someone gets the gavel. This would effectively put us right back where we started, with either Kevin McCarthy as speaker or someone worse than Kevin McCarthy, and just like he was, they'd have the Sword of MAGA swinging over their heads forcing him to do their bidding whether he wants to or not. This would significantly embolden the MAGA party, as they would be able to say "You will do what we say or we will oust you just like we did McCarthy". People like MTG would become exponentially more insufferable than they already are with that kind of power in their hands.

Get the popcorn ready. This is gonna be one hell of a ride.

[-] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago

Both sides didn’t dig their heels in and refuse to compromise. One side compromised plenty to the annoyance of their voters (dems giving concessions to republicans)

The other side never compromised, then said “fuck you”, claimed dems are at fault, stormed the capitol and acted like those “maga extremists” were the normal ones.

This isn’t a both sides thing when one side is fucking committing insurrection while shutting down the gov, that’s not on democrats.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

I didn't say Democrats were wrong for refusing to compromise in this situation. If I were a member of the House, I'd sit back and watch them eat themselves too.

Both sides are refusing to compromise. Just for completely different reasons. Democrats are refusing to compromise because the GOP policies are untenable, they repeatedly go back on their word, and it's not their responsibility to save the GOP from themselves (again). Republicans are refusing to compromise because they have the collective mentality of a 7 year old, their own (now former) speaker just went on record yesterday saying that they know they're supposed to compromise but just don't want to because they're the majority party and fuck you that's why.

My statement about neither side being willing to compromise wasn't a "both sides" attack. It was merely an acknowledgement of the current situation. The reasons why they refuse to compromise are what separates the two sides.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

Theoretically, six moderate republicans could vote for a Democratic speaker.

If they can secure their families in undisclosed locations and get extra security detail.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago

We need something akin to a "vote of no confidence" when Congress refuses to work.

You didn't pass a budget? Great, we get to elect new people who will.

There needs to be some sort of consequences for not governing.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago

Speaker would mean Trump having to "read" and "pay attention". No way he can do it.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Not to mention allow others to speak. Could you imagine Trump with the gavel allowing anyone else to talk? He'd open the session, begin a 2 hour gripe fest on whatever conspiracy theory he saw most recently, and then would gavel the House into recess to get McDonald's.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 51 points 1 year ago

These psychopaths want him as close to the top of the line of successions as possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Speakership is a real job, as in, it requires A LOT of work. You can't just give a press conference, watch yourself on TV, and sign executive orders.

With that in mind, I also support Trump for Speaker of the House. It'll be fucking hilarious at how ungodly terrible it will go. I give him 1 week before he makes up a story about how CIA DNC FBI deep state is trying to kill him, so he has to flee to Mara Lago.

[-] Kage520@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

If Trump gets speaker of the house some morons will try to assassinate the president and vice president to make him regain the presidency.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] FatLegTed@feddit.uk 47 points 1 year ago

House Speaker? Nobody else would get a word in. They'd have to listen to Trump's word salad all day.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

How many "would you just shut up man" would be said on a daily basis.

[-] Poayjay@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

We are in the “technically the rule book doesn’t say that a dog can’t play basketball” stage.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] psmgx@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Speaker of the House is 3rd in line to be President if the Pres and VP are KIA / MIA.

I absolutely believe MAGA (and likely backed by foreign intelligence) would make a play at assassinating the President if Trump was in a speaker role. They were looking to hang people on Jan 6th...

You also have to, like, be an elected official of the House, so this is mostly MTG saying bullshit to retain the spotlight or deflect from dumb shit that Trump did, like getting slammed with a gag order. (Edit: I guess you don't need to be in Congress. Go figure.)

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

You don't actually have to be a member of the House to be speaker. It can literally be anyone. It just never has been anyone else previously.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

All this says to me, is that they have a plan to kill Biden and Harris

Cause thats the only way Trump would accept Speaker position, since Speaker is second after Harris in Succession.

[-] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Yeah its pretty disturbing that they are even floating this idea, and its all to appease the insane conspiracy freaks

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

It will just further their stupid narrative that everything happening against Trump is “politically motivated”, so they want to raise him up to speaker as another way to help shield him from criminal charges. “You can’t charge a sitting Speaker of the House with a crime,” or some shit is what they’ll say. Or they’ll try to impeach/remove both Biden and Harris as a way to install Trump as President outside of an election.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Is Putin her second choice?

[-] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 1 year ago

Considering he has his dick in all their asses, I think he's pushing #2.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 year ago

How does this nitwit remember how to breathe?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They are going to try to make a chancellorship for Trump like they did to Hitler.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 27 points 1 year ago

When is he supposed to have time for this between campaigning and being The Defendant?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I was saying that to my wife. How can he be Speaker and on trial at the same time? It's not like they can just put the trials aside.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Gonna be hard to do that from prison

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

that's the hail mary play - he become speaker, incites enough stochastic terrorism that someone tries to kill biden and harris, then he can pardon himself from any irritating details like past crimes he's been convicted for.

it's absolutely bonkers, but why else would Mungery Howler Greed want to install him there? fucking nutbags

[-] MonosyllabicAmerican@lemmynsfw.com 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They really need to put her back into the glacier they thawed her out of.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 17 points 1 year ago

Every day this clown is in office is just adding to the embarrassment of the republikkkan party. I'd love to hear from a republican (non russian asset) hat legitimately supports her. When you find this guy, notify the FBI because they're a problem.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Lol if she thinks Trump is going to show up and do that job daily, I have stock in Trump NY real estate to sale her

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] harpuajim@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

Good luck getting him to show up to work. He's the laziest person in the US.

[-] paultimate14@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Wasn't this one of the plans floated back in early 2021 as a way to get Trump the presidency? Or maybe I'm confusing it with a plan to re-instate Trump if he were impeached?

The Speaker is 3rd in line for the presidency. Granted, it would still be incredibly difficult to get from there to the presidency, but I'm not accusing the MAGA crowd of having good ideas.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
440 points (92.8% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3483 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS