176
submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Meta Plans to Charge $14 a Month for Ad-Free Instagram or Facebook::European users would have option to pay fee or agree to personalized ads, according to company’s pitch to regulators

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] vikinghoarder@infosec.pub 41 points 10 months ago

Next they will target ad-blockers as reducing their income and trying to ban them using the shitty web drm stuff.

[-] xylogx@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Their ads are natively served so ad blockers already are pretty useless for them already.

[-] popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Facebook Purity completely removes all native ads and is updated each time after it breaks.

It also lets you change the font, size, if pictures load, remove shorts and people you may know, custom scripts, etc. It works for nearly every major browser.

I don't use Facebook except to keep in touch with family, but FB Purity makes things... bearable.

Also, don't judge the decade's old style of the web page. The program is really over a decade old and been maintained this whole time.

[-] zewm@lemmy.zip -1 points 10 months ago

This is why you start using dns level as blocking.

[-] plz1@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

"Served up natively" skirts DNS blocking. To block FB ads, you need something that handles DOM-level blocking, like uBlock Origin. That said, FB is cancer and I recommend blocking the entire platform, not just the ads.

[-] HollandJim@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Good luck with that,

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 11 points 10 months ago

Meta plans to shoot itself in the foot. FTFY

[-] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

After so many rumors about Facebook charging for access, it's hard to take this seriously.

[-] hellequin67@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

I think this will be aimed at mainly EU members after a law banning targeted advertising (without explicit consent) comes in which will mean a reduction in ad revenue to Meta, as a result they're hoping to make up the shortfall by charging users for an ad-free version.

[-] topinambour_rex@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Why would I pay for free ad when I would already get untarget ones ?

[-] schwim@reddthat.com 8 points 10 months ago

I haven't paid a dime and have had ad-free FB for years.

[-] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago
[-] schwim@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago

On the desktop, I use Ublock Origin and FB Purity.

On my phone, I use Hermit to containerize FB Mobile and that's routed through my app and web adblocker, Adguard. I literally haven't seen an FB ad in years with this setup. FBP also allows you to turn off pretty much every annoyance on the site(you may know, if you like this then, people who do this do..)

[-] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Ah, on Android…

[-] sanitetah@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Ublock origin and the likes

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I'd rather give my instance admins this money

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Extract profit, building value is for sucker startups

[-] Enlarging5805@reddthat.com 4 points 10 months ago

Add free doesn't mean tracking free... they still gonna track you and sell your data to advertising companies..

[-] Enlarging5805@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

Add free doesn't mean tracking free... they still gonna track you and sell your data to advertising companies..

[-] olicvb@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Think that'll push the piracy scene to come out with some patch like the reVanced group? Cuz that'd be nice

[-] Gazumi@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

As they say in parts of Liverpool and Ireland..... Get te feck!!!

[-] Dramaking37@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

At least we know how much per user per month to charge them when they inevitably lose your data next time

[-] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

How is a month of Facebook worth as much as a video streaming service like Netflix? How doest that value compare?

[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

What does Meta even make per user? This seems like pure greed/satisfying the shareholders

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
176 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

57291 readers
3174 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS