this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
46 points (97.9% liked)

movies

2953 readers
750 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 1 points 17 minutes ago

More of a genre than a particular movie, but any and all video game movies that aren't the 90s shitshow M•rio movie or the 3 live action Sonic films. I'm talking live action because there have clearly been good video games based animated films like... well I can't think of any right off hand, but they surely exist.

[–] Ilixtze@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

I am not an irritable person, but the ending of the whale Made me get up from my seat and yell "OH COME ON!" To the screen; Frustrating, corny , manipulative misery porn.

[–] HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Princess Bride. The narrative framework of some shitkid not appreciating that his grandpa is Columbo ruins the whole thing. Those two characters should be cut out and then it can be good. ...Okay, Peter Falk can stay.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] moakley@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No Country For Old Men.

I was actually really enjoying the whole cat and mouse thing until the main fucking character died off-screen.

How does nobody ever talk about how shitty that "plot twist" is? It's not clever. It's not entertaining. It's just bad storytelling. They don't even show you a good shot of him to convey what actually happened. My girlfriend and I had to rewind it twice because it was so fucking stupid and made so little sense.

That's actually how I feel about most of the Coen Brothers' movies. The classical narrative structure exists for a reason. It's a good framework for telling a story that makes sense.

Sometimes there's a good artistic reason for diverting from that and telling the story in an unconventional way. Other times it's just pretentious auteur garbage.

[–] TheDorkfromYork@lemm.ee 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This might come off as pretensions, but you should trust the writers more. The movie, and book, are very well written, and if something doesn't make sense, you should consider that you missed something.

I'll say this, Llewelyn Moss is not the main character. The movie doesn't start or end on him. He doesn't change or evolve as a character. How he died isn't the point.

It helps to focus on what Anton Chigurh said about rules, and what the Sheriff says about what he is willing to die for.

If you want me to just spell out the theme, I can do that to, but I think you would enjoy it more if you trust the movie.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Yeah, I've heard that before, about how Llewelyn isn't the main character. Not trying to be rude to you, but that sounds like bullshit. He's the character I'm rooting for. If the main character isn't the character I'm rooting for, then that doesn't sound like an enjoyable movie.

If you're saying Chigurh is the main character: he doesn't grow either.

If you're saying Tommy Lee Jones is the main character (which I've heard before), then I'm going to strain my eyes from rolling them so hard. He doesn't at any point interact with the plot. That's not good writing.

I get the Coens are doing it differently. They're not following the rules for how stories should be told. But different isn't the same as good, and the way they told the story was needlessly confusing and pretentious.

I always find it useful to use food as a metaphor to describe how I feel about movies. If No Country For Old Men were a meal, it would be expertly seasoned and cooked, with one extra ingredient that doesn't belong there and detracts from the whole thing, like if you made a perfect steak and drenched it in liquorice sauce.

And it would be served on a scrap of driftwood, or in a fishbowl, or on literally anything other than a plate. Everyone around me would be raving about the side dishes while I'm wondering why my meat tastes like shit.

You can include themes in a movie and still tell a coherent story. Try this: remove the theme. Is the movie any good? Is the plot entertaining, and does it make sense? No, it'd be really awful, and the inclusion of a theme doesn't excuse that.

[–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Do you not like any movies or shows where the main character is the bad guy? The Sopranos is my all time favorite show but I've never rooted for Tony. Breaking bad is great too but I still never rooted for Walter White.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 1 points 53 minutes ago

You really never rooted for Walt? You didn't hope that he'd make the right decision? You didn't find a little guilty pleasure in the satisfaction of a bad deed done well?

If not, then why did you even watch the show?

I'm fine with rooting for a bad guy. But no, I don't enjoy stories that only have irredeemable characters that I can't root for.

Besides, Javier Bardem won the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor, which doesn't usually go to main characters.

But ok, even if Llewelyn wasn't the main character, he's the central character of the plot. His death resolves the main storyline in the movie, and it happens off screen. That's not good storytelling.

[–] void_turtle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

If the main character isn’t the character I’m rooting for, then that doesn’t sound like an enjoyable movie.

Main character as the bad guy is very common and many great stories are told this way. If you can't find a way to enjoy any of them then idk what to tell you, restrict your viewing habits to marvel movies I guess

[–] scaramobo@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Anything that comes from Marvel. Overrated CGI tripe.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Since you phrased it ambiguously, Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse is amazing.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I’d argue that those are Sony movies, not Marvel.

Back when Marvel was financially struggling, they started selling off rights to various characters. Sony bought Spider-Man (and a handful of other characters), and that’s where the Tobey Maguire movies came from. It’s also why the X-men will likely never be a part of the MCU, because Sony owns the movie rights to (most of) the mutants.

The Spiderverse movies are basically Sony riding the wake of the Tom Holland hype. To be clear, they’re phenomenal movies. But they’re only tangentially related to Marvel.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Oh I agree, I was just being pedantic because OP said "Marvel".

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The only Marvel movies I like and they are not even made by Marvel.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Since I'm already being pedantic, technically produced by Marvel Entertainment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Snowpiercer. It was highly rated on Rotten Tomatoes and from the poster I thought it stared U2's The Edge, so I took a chance. That was the dumbest shit I've ever seen.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago

I suppose a movie in which they spend half of the time running through sleeper cars wouldn't have conveyed the same message about classism.

Time to fight the army of goon in an empty car that seemingly serves no purpose than to host a large violent brawl, now it's time to walk through the sleeper car for all the goons you fought, now it's time to walk through the kitchen car for the goons, not it's time to walk through the laundry car for the goons. Oh look, it's a rich person party car, what a weird thing to have at all in any context, are they aware the world has ended? Now time to go through the partier's sleeper car, then the partier's kitchen car, then the partier's laundry car...

[–] expect_nothing@leminal.space 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 4 hours ago

Were you not entertained?

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Almost all of Will Ferrell's movies, but especially Talladega Nights, a stupid movie about stupid people doing stupid things according to a stupid script. It's one of two movies I've ever walked out on (the other being Split, which is just gross). Stranger Than Fiction is the only good movie with Will Ferrell in a starring roll.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 1 points 56 minutes ago* (last edited 56 minutes ago)

Stranger Than Fiction is by far Ferrell's best work, because it's the only film of his where he doesn't act like an insufferable man-child.

I wish he would play it straight in more films. He's actually a decent actor when he doesn't act like a fucking idiot.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Zoolander is a great movie.

Mugatu isn't a starring role and Will Ferrell plays the part well. If he was playing Zoolander the movie wouldn't be anywhere near as good.

[–] Vesker@lemm.ee 7 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

The Dark Knight Rises. Not only is it a bad Batman movie, it oddly has a pro cop message. Also, I can't take Bane seriously at all with that ridiculous voice.

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago

All of Nolan’s Batman movies were heavily pro-cop. Watch TDK again: the day is saved by illegal surveillance, and Batman faces no consequences for using it.

[–] kandykarter@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 hours ago

This is how I felt about all the Nolan Batman movies, except it was Batman himself I couldn't take seriously because of Bale's ridiculous Cookie Monster voice. I think I burst out laughing in the theatre when I first heard it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] goober@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Uncut Gems

A stressful two hours of screaming and bad decisions

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That's the point... We're watching the spiral of a gambling addict. Its pure anxiety, and it's done so well.

[–] goober@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I get that but you are not convincing me that this is good

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

I guess its personal preference, it's like eating food with a lot of spice. Some people enjoy the stress it brings.

load more comments
view more: next ›