this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
7 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

8050 readers
982 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 hours ago

I signed the petition fully expecting and knowing it would be denied.

The point, for me, wasn't to revoke his citizenship but to get more Canadians talking about Musk. He is a very real threat to our democracy and quality of life and we need to be talking about how we can counteract him.

[–] marv99@feddit.org 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

If this guy has the Canadian citizenship, would it be possible to enact a tax for Canadian billionaires intriguing against Canada? Just an idea.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 7 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Or just a 99% tax on all wealth over, say, 1bn, belonging to any Canadian citizen regardless of residence. The problem will thus solve itself.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago

If the UK can do it to the Beatles we can absolutely do it to Musk.

this the way. even just some percent because it would be reoccuring year after year.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There are real things we can be doing to damage the Nazi that do not include violating citizenship law.

Regardless of how you feel about Musk, acting like Trump doesn't solve problems and the ignorant Canadians responsible for the petition need to give their heads a shake.

[–] terath@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

People trying to β€œboth sides same” when Musk is calling our sovereignty fake and aiding a country that has literally threatened us with war to annex us, needs to give their head a shake.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago

This isn't a "both sides" thing.

It is simply wrong to weaponize citizenship whether it is Trump or a bunch of ignorant Canadians doing it.

Regardless of how you feel about it, Musk is "half Canadian".

The thing we should be doing is in the article, not wasting time on debating citizenship rights. We can decide we don't allow dual citizenship anymore and make everyone choose to be Canadian or not. He also has facilities in Canada, and tax obligations, we can go after. All of which would be far more productive than violating the rights that legally defines one as Canadian in the first place.

https://www.ourcommons.ca/petitions/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-5345

The fact that a petition to not allow Trump into Canada is a foot note, with less signatures than a petition to remove citizenship at whim, is horrifying.

Give your head a shake.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Even though I signed, I knew this petition was a bit of a meme. That said people can call for anything, legal or not, if an MP is willing to sponsor it. Legal citizens cannot and shouldn't have their citizenship revoked but this is a legitimate expression of discontent towards Musk's frankly anti-Canadian actions.

I can't help but feel like there's a way to express discontent that doesn't also encourage the weaponization of citizenship to circumvent the legal system.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Tbh, this is why I didn't entertain the idea of signing it. It's a bad precedent if nothing else.

Now, what are the treason laws in Canada?

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Treason

(2) Every one commits treason who, in Canada,

(a) uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province;

(b) without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada;

( c) conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);

(d) forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or

(e) conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that intention by an overt act.


Basically, the US government would atually have to use force to overthrow the government, and we would have to be able to prove in court that Elon participated in those actions.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Sedition maybe?

Sedition

59 (1) Seditious words are words that express a seditious intention.
(2) A seditious libel is a libel that expresses a seditious intention.
(3) A seditious conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to carry out a seditious intention.
(4) Without limiting the generality of the meaning of the expression seditious intention, every one shall be presumed to have a seditious intention who
(a) teaches or advocates, or
(b) publishes or circulates any writing that advocates,
the use, without the authority of law, of force as a means of accomplishing a governmental change within Canada.

Emphasis mine.

"Force" is a broad term, and doesn't necessarily imply violence. Trump has indicated he would use economic force on Canada to get us to capitulate. Musk is working with Trump very closely, and said Trudeau wasn't "governor" anymore.

At this time, it would probably be easier to make that charge stick. I don't know if "force" has a concrete legal definition.

Immigration lawyer Gabriela Ramo says that under Canadian law, someone's citizenship can only be revoked if it can be proven that they committed fraud or misrepresentation to obtain it.

"Before they could move to do this, they would need to introduce legislation, there would have to be amendments to the current Citizenship Act," said Ramo, former chair of the Canadian Bar Association's immigration section. "There's no provision that would allow them to pursue revocation of citizenship of a Canadian birth, by virtue of his birth to a Canadian mother."

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Good. Very disappointed with Charlie Angus. Stunts like this are harmful to our governance. (Obligatory: Elon sucks.)