this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
453 points (81.6% liked)

Political Memes

6260 readers
2730 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

fuck it. I voted dem every election and they did fuckall. We got obamacare, whoop deee doo. we have to buy insurance now. fat load of good that did.

Fuck the dems. I'm leaving and voting for some other party, and you should too. campaigning for a third .arty should start right fucking now, so the dems can't say "oH, ThE TiMe FoR SuPpOrTiNg a ThIrD pArTy IsN't 5 MoNtHs BeFoRe An ElEcTIoN!" Fuck you, you goddamned fake ass left party.

[–] Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Democrats

Not opposing Trump, because unlike the last 40 years, we learn that a party has to have a super-majority in a government body to stop the opposing party from doing everything they want all the time.

How could non-voters do this.

[–] lutillian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 37 minutes ago

I'm not sure we can attribute this inaction to much more than the established Democrats actually stand to personally benefit from these policies. They don't really have a reason to push back because their donors are the same people in most cases (there are a few exceptions) and so many of them have the same level of gerrymandering and name recognition in their districts as the opposition.

This is not a statement that both parties are the same. They demonstratively are not as Democrats won't typically be the ones to enact these policies but they also don't really have a reason to stop them either since things like the tax breaks personally benefit them.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 19 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Now is exactly the right time to criticize the dems, make them step up their game. Would be better 4 years ago, but here we are.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The Dems are a minority in both the House and the Senate at the moment, they're literally powerless.
The best time to criticize them would have been over the last two years, when they actually could have done something about the mess.

[–] Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

The Republicans seem to be able to stop a lot of things, especially if the opposing party not only doesn't control every branch of government, but doesn't have a 60+ majority of the senate with a comfortable margin to write off the {Manchins, Sinemas, Libermans, etc.}. But now suddenly a minority party can't stop their opponents from doing things, even if it is blatantly unconstitutional? It seems like the Democrats are never playing to win.

In reality, the Democrats want this all to continue, because if Trump fucks things up enough and destroys things enough, the Democrats only appeal of "we aren't the Republicans" can for once, become a winning strategy in 2026/2028.

[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That’s the key “stops a lot of things”. The way that Congress is structured makes it pretty easy to stop things since there are many choke points. Notice that republicans aren’t really trying to “do things” in Congress?

The current issues and actions are being driven by the executive branch where they’re ignoring the law and constitution . Being in the minority in Congress means that Dems can’t trigger investigations or much of anything to formally push back unless they’re joined by some republicans.

I’ll agree that they could make more noise and should block things up more than they’re doing presently, but these actions wouldn’t really stop or significantly slow any of this.

I’m sick of the green lanterism that gets trotted out to suggest that they’re not stopping things because they don’t want to. Voters didn’t give them power in the last election, so we’re working from a position of weakness.

There are still veto points and lawsuits to be made. Along with the more vocal opposition that you admit that they should engage in. It is neither that they could perfectly stop everything, but that they could actually start trying. The Democrats decided that they should sit back because if Trump fucks things up enough, they will have an easy time in 2026/2028, without changing their usual platform of "We are not the Republicans, we will give you nothing else".

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

They should like... Be politicians though. We get they can't pass legislation, but be fucking politicians.

Republicans out of the majority make you sniff their shit daily and are all over the news cycle. Democrats seem to think it's ok to just say they're concerned and send me fundraising emails.

[–] 3x7x37@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 hours ago

Second highest turnout in history, but yeah, the non voters are the real issue here. Libs are so privileged they can't even imagine people living from paycheck to paycheck. "Just vote, you losing your job and becoming homeless is worth it for democracy".

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 12 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Second highest voter turn out for a presidential election in US history.

Clearly its the voters fault.....

Also why in the broken nation is the assumption that if more people showed up they would have voted like you? I never got this concept. Please spend more effort being an opposition/resistance and less being poor losers.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 22 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Millions of people who voted for Biden in 2020 didn't show up to vote for Harris in 2024.

Trump's numbers barely changed at all between the two.

[–] lemminator@lemmy.today 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

And I can't say that I blame them. Biden's presidency... or his campaign... or Harris' campaign...

It was a shit-show all the way through. Maybe next time the Democrats should try catering to their voter base.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 53 minutes ago

19 Million primary voters picked Biden in 2024.

He won the primary, as has every incumbent for many many decades.

We failed them, not the other way around.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, and that does not imply what the democrats think it does.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It doesn't imply anything, it's a fact that Voters chose fascism and now they're facing the consequences.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Voter turnout being high is great for non-republicans.

[–] WagyuSneakers@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Dems will do anything to not accept responsibility for fumbling 12 years in office since 2000.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I hate the us government as much as the next invasion target, but this stupid tribalism has gotten out of hand. Was this the inevitable result of a two party system (a joke pretending to be a democracy)? Maybe, but the very idea that I am expected to "pick a side" even as a outsider and that once I do half of the us will write me off is laughable.

America, you did this. Stop trying to make it someone else's fault.

If we are to assume that there was voting suppression, do something about it!

If we are to assume that there was voting fraud, do something about it!

If we are to assume that the majority of americans did not want the current administration, then do something about it!

This should be a no brainier if you have the majority of americans against this then you should have the will and ability to do something about it.
But you clearly don't have the majority of your nations people behind you in this, most likely don't care enough (a side effect of that two party system) or and this might shock you, that the majority of americans are really just that awful and want to watch the free world burn.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Second highest by sheer number, eighth by percent of voting eligible population.

From your source:

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Why did you cut out the VEP? The very next column....

it stands for Voting Eligible Population by the way.

Edit, for those not willing to click a link here is the picture not cut off:

Notice how there are 3 measurements of voter turn out? Two of which show this to have been the second highest turn out? Now does this show a larger then there should be level of disenfranchisement? Yes, so fix that!

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (7 children)

I cut off the VEP because I mistook the voting age population for the voting eligible population and now that you pointed that out (thank you by the way) I’m looking into why there’s such a difference between those two numbers.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Rin@lemm.ee 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

In American politics, it doesn't matter who you vote for, you're still getting fucked! Like choosing a broom and a stick to get fucked with.

what needs to change is the way that voting work. Or at least people to vote for someone less embarassing than Harris and less facist than trump and a lot less in favor of the capitalists in general (Bernie my beloved).

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Bernie couldn’t even win a primary.

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

they didn't let him win the primary. they had their chosen candidate, and they weren't going to let an actual progressive win.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 5 minutes ago

Still not convinced that wasn't rigged.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 105 points 14 hours ago (15 children)

I’ve been voting. Doesn’t seem to work.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 22 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

I'm just gonna leave this here: https://www.gregpalast.com/trump-lost-vote-suppression-won/

There is evidence to support widespread vote suppression is occurring by "vigilantes" knocking people off the voter registry amongst other tactics

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 24 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

A third of the eligible voters didn't vote. If they had, this tiny marginal bullshit wouldn't matter.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›