this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
1511 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

63186 readers
3282 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] azalty@jlai.lu 0 points 2 hours ago

What we need are good algorithms

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, I hate BlueSky too, but I think the reason it's more popular than Mastodon is that it's more centralized and in practical terms that means it's easier to adopt and engage with.

The biggest headache I have with Mastodon (and Lemmy, to a lesser extent) is defederation. I understand it's the most practical thing to do sometimes, but it's waaay overdone. Like, there needs to be a culture of only defederating as a last resort due to pratical concerns (e.g. bots I guess). Unfortunately the current culture is one where many instance admins treat defederation as a personal blocklist. I wish more admins would leave it to individual users to decide who to allow or not.

[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing -1 points 3 hours ago

They planned ahead to make it popular, twitter developed it while losing money, my conspiracy theory is their goal was always to transition to bluesky since its model is more sustainable for long term control

[–] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

When I first got a Bluesky account, back when it was invite-only a whole bunch of the Physicists and Astronomers I used to follow on Twitter were already there. If anything it seemed like scientists were early adopters.

[–] Mars2k21@sh.itjust.works 53 points 20 hours ago (9 children)

Going to play devil's advocate here.

Bluesky is just...better than any Fediverse microblogging platform. In terms of UI, discoverability, and keeping a balance of users in the community.

Mastodon sucks for regular people. And none of the other better platforms like Firefish ever gain enough steam to beat Mastodon because of existing issues in the structure of the Fediverse and ActivityPub (this also includes Mastodon itself to an extent).

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

Because Bluesky keeps to what made Twitter popular in the first place. The UX. You make a post and its syndicated to a federated feed that anyone can search for, and you can tag content using hashtags.

It's a great concept. There's a reason a lot of people use it.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 14 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Mastodon is great.

The only reason why it doesn't get as much traction is because it doesn't manipulate your dopamine and serotonin receptors like other networks do with their black box algorithms that are designed to steal as much of your attention as possible, while almost certainly throwing you into an unhealthy filterbubble/echochamber.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That is also true to Bluesky, and to a lesser extent, even for the Lemmy-Reddit divide. I've seen people leaving the alternative platforms for the mainstream ones, because the alternative ones "didn't made them stay as long". For me, being less addictive was part of the reason why I prefer the alt platforms, although with reddit, I had to browse through a lot of garbage already, long before the API drama.

[–] oni@lemm.ee 7 points 15 hours ago

what are those?

existing issues in the structure of the Fediverse and ActivityPub

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 45 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Would be better if it was Mastodon, but I suppose I shouldn't let perfect be the enemy of good, and good riddance to Twitter, indeed.

[–] Sine_Fine_Belli@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

Same here, well said. Bluesky’s not perfect, at least it’s not Twitter. I wish more people would use it though

[–] shininghero@pawb.social 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

While there has been some onboarding QOL stuff for mastodon, Bluesky still has them beat on that.

The "People" segment in the explore menu is a nice start, but it's still dependent on the users picking a server that somewhat matches their interests.

[–] grepe@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

thing is lot of that is on purpose. mastodon and fediverse are more of an attempt to come back to the state where there is no algorithm picking for you... but too many people nowdays are simply too lazy to search and actively choose what they want to see.

what we really need is to separate content (keep that in fediverse) and content access and presentation (the interface people use to access the content). if you want a bot feeding you content whole day and for your internet to become a tv you nobody can stop you. but if you want to think amd search nobody should stop you either

[–] lemmus@szmer.info 20 points 19 hours ago

The thing is, bluesky is just old twitter, it will become X eventually...Bluesky sucks, but jessus, mastodon sucks in terms of usability. Its only for technical people and experience on mastodon is fatal compared to bluesky, sad that mastodon won't take over, as it could...at least bluesky is not bad YET.

[–] sircac@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

I would prefer any ActivityPub instance, but press media (and in general private entities), to which scientific institutes intend diffusion, is moving to bluesky...

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 71 points 1 day ago (22 children)

I feel like scientists should move towards open source solutions ... I feel like most scientists are smart enough to launch a mastodon server, but well.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Never worked in academia eh? Plenty of dumb (and, more importantly here, computer illiterate) people there too.

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago

I'm pretty sure there are a handful of technically literate scientists who are able to install servers lmao.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 25 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Most scientists aren't allowed to do stuff like that, or purely just don't have the time.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Or know how. Just because they are scientists doesn't mean that they are necessarily particularly computer literate. I once had to explain to a university professor that wireless electricity doesn't exist, and the Wi-Fi is only for internet. So yeah.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Being a scientist doesn't mean you have the technical knowledge to run a public facing server.

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 2 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Being a scientist kinda means to me you're able to follow a very easy to understand guide to install mastodon on ...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 115 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Non-EU folk - this website won’t open in EU because they don’t want to follow our local user privacy protections. What they’re going to do with your data? Who knows.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 day ago

There's no excuse for using Xittter in 2025.

[–] DSTGU@sopuli.xyz 19 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

First time seeing HTTP code 451

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 21 points 22 hours ago

https://http.cat/status/451

because I needed an explanation of what that means, and I wanted it to be cute and funny.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pls@lemmy.plaureano.nohost.me 9 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

I have no clue on the reasons people like Bluesky (or threads). None at all.

[–] shortrounddev@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Bluesky has a lot more normies on it while mastodon is mostly early-adopter types. Mastodon, in my experience, is either very technical people (software engineers and other tech people) or very political people. Bluesky has normal people on it

I checked out threads for a day and I liked it because the algorithm wasn't jamming a bunch of outrage content down my throat but that's the only thing I can say about it. Haven't used it since then (deleted my entire meta account)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›