this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
510 points (99.0% liked)

tumblr

3715 readers
668 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Reminds me of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snow_Crash or maybe the Zoey Ashe series

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 55 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Have a hard time imagining that capital owners would rather pay workers to supervise AI than make the courts look the other way when a self-driving truck creates accidents ...

[–] gex@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe it could be a single person monitoring 10 autonomous trucks from a remote control center

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

That would be easier if they attached the trucks to each other.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 6 points 14 hours ago

Bingo. Simply look to the military for the future. Kids sitting in a comfortable location in California dropping bombs on children overseas.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 47 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

At some point it probably becomes more valuable to offer jobs that barely keep people alive than it does to deal with the sheer number of unemployed people who are now ready to burn everything down.

Then again, capitalism has never been good at externalities.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 19 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I expect a resurgence of jobs like "servant" and "shoe-shiner". You don't need these, either, but this way capitalists can lord their wealth over the masses face-to-face.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 10 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Not sure they want that face-to-face with people that far below them. Too easy for any one of them to Luigi.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 30 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

This is part of the equation that they've proven themselves consistently awful at assessing properly.

There was this guy who did a bunch of interviews with super wealthy people about their apocalypse shelter plans, and he was like "What stops all the poors from killing you and taking your stuff?"

And they're like "Oh, we have ex-Navy SEAL private security details, we're good."

So the guy asks them "What stops the SEALs from killing you and taking your stuff?"

They were stumped. Not a one of them had a good answer. Like, one guy floated having the only password to the vault where all the supplies are kept, as if Navy SEALs don't know how to torture information out of someone. Waterboarding was that guy's best case outcome.

They really, really don't understand that they need us, but we don't need them. And the only thing keeping them alive is that we haven't really figured that out yet either.

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

Give it a couple generations of malnutrition and genetic damage. Those lower classes will look like toasters and microwaves. Ez to face.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 6 points 15 hours ago

Probably they do both. The paid drivers are a bit of a side-project to get government subsidies for 'job creation' and such.

[–] maxalmonte14@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (5 children)

The most terrifying part is people being forced to drink beer instead of water, they'd be dropping like flies because of dehydration.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 27 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Historically, as I understand it, what they would drink would be pretty weak ABV. 2-3%. Barely beer at all. It'd be plenty hydrating.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 8 points 16 hours ago

You can keep hydrated from alcoholic drinks up to around 10% alcohol. Of course you'll be drunk as fuck all the time is it had more than around 3%.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Seems like a win.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago

I've heard anything under 4% is actually hydrating. That comes with no source though.

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] maxalmonte14@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That's truly fascinating, it never occurred to me, but low alcohol beverages could be way safer than untreated water.

[–] sockman@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago

My understanding is that weak beer was the source of people's water intake for most of human history.