this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
48 points (94.4% liked)

politics

19722 readers
3558 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Grunt4019@lemm.ee 17 points 2 weeks ago

Bigotry and a distraction from economic issues.

[–] Tujio@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Seriously. Do we really think that all of these old men suddenly care about fairness in women's sports?

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

this issue is so aggravating but that's one background detail that's just so absurd. republicans made a hobby of openly mocking women's sports up until just a few years ago.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure it’s because republican men got turned on by a few of these individuals and they can’t reconcile with that.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Bruh. It's not gay if they identify as a woman. You're good."

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Dude! Just say "no homo" before and after. "

[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

And during. Upon every thrust.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

The goal is to legally define sex as assigned at birth as static and to make adult transition illegal and impossible. Directly stating this would alienate most, so instead they must focus on the dozen or so trans school athletes to hide under a more “reasonable” sounding argument. This also serves to falsely convey the idea that trans people are everywhere. There need to be enough of us to be a dangerous target to keep the Fox News Hour of Hate going.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Extreme minority of people you will likely never know that you interacted with are the real problems in America.

Won't you make sports safe for women again? You know how much we value female sports as a country. We are not sexist assholes in the slightest. Please keep paying attention to those bad bad trans people while we put more rapists in charge.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

They should probably combine their bullshit narrative about caravans of brown people heading for the southern border with bullshit narratives about caravans of trans heading to THEIR town straight from California or whatever.

Both of these "concerns" are things they use to keep their base distracted with nonsense...

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's a distraction. People won't care about tax cuts and tariffs if they have something like this to be furious about. Honestly, I'd never really heard of or thought about a trans person until that manufactured bathroom bill all those years ago. I just assumed there were crossdressers and maybe a few people who got sex changes occasionally. Even then I was confused as fuck why it was something to worry about.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The people that wake up in a cold sweat about where trans women (they focus about 99% of their energy on trans women) are relieving themselves seems to be relatively low and I bet it's nearly the same people that obsessed over gay marriage (between men, especially - again, it seems their energies are nearly all directed at gay men and what they do behind closed doors). Which is weird, because I'm cishet, and this kind of thing is not something that I ever really find myself worrying about, like, ever.

But there is a certain kind of man that just seems to get so worked up over the very notion of trans women (and honestly, they still obsess over gay men, too, it's just that they lost the battle over gay marriage and people now just mostly yawn at the idea of gay marriage), and I think we can make a pretty good guess as to why they have these obsessions.

And then there are the people like Nancy Mace that are probably mostly doing it for performative bullshit points for their stupid marks.

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's manufactured outrage, they did the same thing with abortion. Nobody cared about it before the Republican party started telling people to care about it.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

This is part of the Grievance Industrial Complex. It's about distracting idiots from the fact that they are getting FUCKED by the broligarchy.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Bigotry and it's easy to lobby against literally a handful of people in a given population. Real problems are hard and rarely actually solved by conservative policy.