this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
540 points (95.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

6125 readers
928 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

The first quarter of this century is over at the end of 2025.

2001 was the first year in this century. 2025 is the 25th year in this century. 2100 will be the 100th - and last - year in this century.

(1 was the first year in the first century, 100 was the 100th - and last - year in the first century. That's why every subsequent century starts on xx1 or xxx1 as well)

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

So 2000 was still 2nd millennium?

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Don't you remember all the pedantic asshats saying that 2000 wasn't a new century? "There was no year zero!", "People just want all the digits to change!", "You're celebrating a year early!"

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't, to be honest. I wasn't exposed to much pedantry back then. I wasn't exposed to many people on general, but that's not a conversation for this place :D

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm an old fart who graduated high school in '99, so I was right in the middle of all the blossoming internet pedantry.

You're in a safe space among friends here, feel free to expose yourself whenever you want!

...wait...

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

Expose myself? What kind of amateur fighter do you take me for?

oooh that kind of expose!

Nah, I had no PC or internet, not many friends and my parents didn't do a lot of the "meet up with other parents so the kids can play together" stuff because we're all socially dysfunctional.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Yes, but most people ignored it and celebrated the new millennium at the end of 1999 and beginning of 2000 anyway.

See this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium#Debate_over_millennium_celebrations

It's quite interesting. For example Fidel Castro made sure that Cuba celebrated correctly at the end of year 2000. And the U.S. Naval Observatory, official timekeeper for the country, held a party for the new milennium then too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Resol@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Apparently yeah. In fact, it's actually easy to tell which years are in the 2nd millenium just by knowing its final year.

But people chose to celebrate the new millenium in 2000 because it's much more fun to have every single digit in a calendar year change than having only one digit change and calling it "a new millenium". Also, January 1, 2000 looks and feels so much cooler in my opinion, unless you write it in the dd/mm/yy format (mm/dd/yy wouldn't make much of a difference), in which case 01/01/01 has that nice satisfying feeling of all variables being the same value.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 2 points 6 days ago (3 children)

That doesn't make much sense though, year 0 does exist. We define our calendar based on Jesus's supposed birth year, not his birth year+1. Or?

[–] callyral@pawb.social 2 points 6 days ago

Year 0 doesn't exist because it's either before or after Christ being born. What would year 0 be?

There'd also be asymmetry if there was a 0 A.D. but no 0 B.C. (as that wouldn't really make sense)

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago

Yeah, year 0 doesn't exist, it goes 1BC -> 1AD

[–] PetteriSkaffari@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Only programmers start counting with 0. All the normal people start with 1.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago

Obviously not everywhere but marriage equality made great strides.

[–] callyral@pawb.social 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Resol@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yes. The fediverse wouldn't get much awareness if it wasn't for Twitter and Reddit absolutely shutting themselves. I wouldn't even be here if that never happened.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's technology in a nutshell. We moved off of one platform to join another.

If we didn't, we'd still be sending each other messages on AOL and join chatrooms to have discussions.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Haven't thought of AOL in years but recently it's been coming up at random. On a TV show last night somebody's neighbor said "Check your AOL" because they sent an email that morning and the person hadn't replied yet.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Assuming you meant "shitting themselves" - Lemmy is doing that too, it just wipes better, at least for now.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I met and married an amazing person this century, so I've got that going for me which is nice.

Congratulations! Same here!

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago
[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Well yeah, I've got a better job and my country inflation is finally going down. That's good in my books!

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Conservatism has dragged America fifty years behind in tech progress and wasted all of our resources on destruction over building. I wish this country would get fucking NUKED. America is a dismal failure on every level

[–] bradd@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Describe the 50 years of tech progress that we've lost or you're full of shit.

[–] ToucheGoodSir@lemy.lol 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Ehh looking at semi conductor & solar panel production I see what this persons saying. "Losing 50 years of tech progress" isn't quite accurate definitely, however the US has decayed its tech lead compared to the space race era, for example.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

We could be driving electric cars and having solar panels everywhere.

We could be having the fastest wifi network.

We could have high speed trains.

Medical advances as well. I don't even want to go into the vaccine territory.

All of those things were considered problematic by the old guard, who conservatives supported. One side continues to protect the yacht owning class. Conservatives would still be fighting marijuana if the rest of the population didn't tell them to fuck off.

And if you think this is all wishy-washy speculation, get the fuck out of America for a minute and look around the rest of the world. American cities are no where near other international cities in terms of living, quality, tech, support. You have to be dumb as fuck to not recognize how often Conservatives vote against tech initiatives to line their own pockets.

[–] ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The thing about losing progress is you can’t know where you would be if priorities were different.

If the same amount of passion and resources was poured into the space program for the last 50 years as it was during the moon landing we would certainly be much further ahead, but no one would be able to tell you where would we be.

How do expect someone to describe something that hasn’t been invented yet?

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The thing about losing progress is you can’t know where you would be if priorities were different.

There are some cases where you can know where you'd be if priorities were different. Hence the most frustrating graph in the world:

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Very revealing if it's true. Fusion is the perpetual "20 years away" poster child.

[–] ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

Best graph I’ve ever seen

[–] Jamablaya@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

No. Have you not been paying attention?

[–] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 days ago

I like having a smart phone, but maybe that's just me.

load more comments
view more: next ›